This spread sheet shows ABS geographic standards from 2006 across Australia and the % of the 15-64 year old population within each Socio-Economic Indexes for Individuals (SEIFI) IRSD group. The data used to create this information was the same as used in the research paper “Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas: Getting a handle on individual diversity within areas” by Phillip Wise and Rosalynn Mathews. It is advised that this paper is read to further develop an understanding of the concepts and caveats associated with the analytical output contained in the spreadsheet. Group 1 – Approx. most disadvantage 20% of the 15-64 year old population Group 2 – Approx. second most disadvantaged 20% of the 15- 64 population Group 3 – Approx. second least disadvantaged 30% of the 15-64 year old population Group 4 – Approx. least disadvantaged 30% of the 15-64 year old population

This spread sheet shows ABS geographic standards from 2006 across Australia and the % of the 15-64 year old population within each Socio-Economic Indexes for Individuals (SEIFI) IRSAD group. The data used to create this information was the same as used in the research paper “Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas: Getting a handle on individual diversity within areas” by Phillip Wise and Rosalynn Mathews. It is advised that this paper is read to further develop an understanding of the concepts and caveats associated with the analytical output contained in the spreadsheet.] Roughly, the most disadvantaged 10% of the 15–64 year old population falls into group 1, whilst group 10 contains the most advantaged 10%. The smallest group in terms of 15–64 year old population proportion is group 6 with 7.78%, compared to group 7 with the largest percentage at 12% due to clustering at this point in the distribution of scores. Group 1 – Approx. 9.6% of the 15-64 year old population Group 2 – Approx. 10.0% of the 15-64 year old population Group 3 – Approx. 11.5% of the 15-64 year old population Group 4 – Approx. 8.6% of the 15-64 year old population Group 5 – Approx. 11.4% of the 15-64 year old population Group 6 – Approx. 7.8% of the 15-64 year old population Group 7 – Approx. 12.0% of the 15-64 year old population Group 8 – Approx. 9.1% of the 15-64 year old population Group 9 – Approx. 9.5% of the 15-64 year old population Group 10 – Approx. 10.5% of the 15-64 year old population

This spread sheet shows all of the State Suburbs for the ACT and the % of the 15-64 year old population within each Socio-Economic Indexes for Individuals (SEIFI) IRSD group. The data used to create this information was the same as used in the research paper “Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas: Getting a handle on individual diversity within areas” by Phillip Wise and Rosalynn Mathews. It is advised that this paper is read to further develop an understanding of the concepts and caveats associated with the analytical output contained in the spreadsheet. Group 1 – Approx. most disadvantage 20% of the 15-64 year old population Group 2 – Approx. second most disadvantaged 20% of the 15- 64 population Group 3 – Approx. second least disadvantaged 30% of the 15-64 year old population Group 4 – Approx. least disadvantaged 30% of the 15-64 year old population Please also note that not all ACT CDs have been included as their populations are below the ABS population count threshold (<3), those removed are: - 8013801 in Reid - 8012805 in Turner - 8014302 in Kingston - 8021701 in Unclassified ACT - 8010110 in Bonner - 8023401 in Tharwa - 8010103 in Unclassified ACT - 8014305 in Kingston - 8014803 in Forrest It should be noted that multiple Compact Discs of data make up this dataset, as a result the data for each suburb is distributed across several discs. This cccounts for the multiple rows of data that appear for each suburb.

This data is Statistical Local Areas (SLA) based Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) Index of Advantage/Disadvantage (IRSAD) - Is a continuum of advantage to disadvantage. Low values indicate areas of disadvantage; and high values indicate areas of advantage. This data is based on the 2006 census and follows the 2006 Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) boundaries. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has developed indexes to allow ranking of regions/areas, providing a method of determining the level of social and economic wellbeing in that region. There are four indexes included in the SEIFA 2006 product. They relate to socio-economic aspects of geographic areas. Each index summarises a different aspect of the socio-economic conditions in an area. The indexes have been obtained by a technique called principal components analysis. This technique summarises the information from a variety of social and economic variables, calculating weights that will give the best summary for the underlying variables. For the SEIFA indexes, each index uses a different set of underlying variables. All the indexes (including the Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage) have been constructed so that relatively disadvantaged areas (e.g. areas with many low income earners) have low index values. This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 2033.0.55.001) used with permission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. For more information on this data please visit the Australian Bureau of Statistics.Please note: AURIN has spatially enabled the original data following the 2006 ASGC.

,Publikacja prezentuje dane dotyczące rodzaju głównego i dodatkowego źródła utrzymania ludności oraz osób niepełnosprawnych opracowane w oparciu o wyniki NSP 2011. Zawiera szczegółową charakterystykę osób według źródeł utrzymania w powiązaniu z cechami demograficznymi i społeczno – ekonomicznymi takimi jak wiek, płeć, poziom wykształcenia oraz aktywność ekonomiczna. Prezentowane są również informacje o liczbie i strukturze osób niepełnosprawnych według płci i wieku, miejsca zamieszkania, stanu cywilnego, poziomu wykształcenia, źródeł utrzymania oraz aktywności ekonomicznej tej szczególnej zbiorowości osób. Należy w tym miejscu podkreślić, że zgodnie z zapisami ustawy z dnia 4 marca 2010 r. o narodowym spisie powszechnym ludności i mieszkań w 2011 r. udzielanie odpowiedzi na pytania dotyczące niepełnosprawności odbywało się na zasadzie dobrowolności. Dane z tego obszaru zostały wyprowadzone poprzez uogólnienie danych zebranych w 20% próbie (w skali kraju) osób mieszkających lub przebywających w wylosowanych mieszkaniach. Dla wybranych załączonych tablic wynikowych zostały wyznaczone wskaźniki precyzji (oznaczone jako CV i wyrażone w procentach) umożliwiające użytkownikom właściwą ocenę danych.,