Deep water fish and shark surveys with baited video (BRUVS)
공공데이터포털
The use of baited videos enabled non-destructive sampling of a vast variety (228 species) of fishes, sharks, rays and sea snakes below the limits of safe SCUBA diving. No localised nests of species richness and diversity were detected, but sightings for 42% of all species were restricted to one or other particular area of the six areas surveyed. On average, this restriction to single areas occurred for 53% of the families sighted. About 50% of butterfly fish species were restricted in their distributions to one particular area and this family had important leverage in forcing the community patterns. Two major groupings, and one further, minor grouping, of fish communities were recognised in the Lagoon the seaward lagoon margins, the inner, central lagoon, and a further split away by 2 locations in the innermost lagoon.
Surveys of fish-habitat associations in the region offshore from James Price Point, Western Australia, using Baited Remote Underwater Video Stations (BRUVS (TM))
공공데이터포털
Baited Remote Underwater Video Stations (BRUVS (TM)) were deployed in coastal waters between Quondong Point and Coulomb Point, to sample demersal and semi-demersal fishes, sharks, rays and sea snakes. Of the 197 BRUVS (TM) deployed, 154 produced imagery of sufficient quality to classify the benthic substratum, epibenthic cover and to identify and count vertebrates.BRUVS (TM) were deployed below the 5 metre depth contour (lowest astronomical tide) and placed at random within a grid of the entire study area (30x14 km), at spacings not less than 450m apart, to avoid double counting of more mobile fish. Surveys were completed around the neap tides in mid October 2009. Habitats dominated by stony corals were not sampled because they occurred intertidally, or in waters too shallow for access by the survey vessel. Baited Remote Underwater Video Stations (BRUVS (TM)) were deployed to provide baseline estimates of the diversity and relative abundance of demersal and semi-demersal fishes, sharks, rays and sea snakes in the James Price Point coastal area in direct relation to habitat and depth.
Woodside Pluto BRUVS (Baited Remote Underwater Video Systems Sampling Site) Survey 2009
공공데이터포털
A field survey was conducted by the Centre for Marine Futures, University of Western Australia (UWA) under contract to Sinclair Knight Merz (SKM) as part of the Woodside Energy Ltd Pluto LNG Project Baseline Marine Habitat Survey. The survey was undertaken to benchmark the existing distribution, relative abundance and size structure of fish assemblages within Mermaid Sound, Western Australia. The survey was undertaken using stereo Baited Remote Underwater Video Systems (stereo-BRUVS), a non-destructive, fishery independent sampling technique. This file identifies the locations of the sampled sites.
Shark surveys at Scott and Mermaid Reefs
공공데이터포털
A total of 103 sharks from 11 species were seen on video footage collected using four deployment methods in shallow and deep habitats around Mermaid and Scott Reefs. BRUVS were set on the seabed in lagoon waters (14-48 m) and on the sides of deep drop-offs (58-72 m) at both reefs. Single BRUVS or a stereo-BRUVS were hung at 15m range from the surface over shallow and very deep (>300m) waters at Mermaid Reef. On average, the rate of sighting of sharks on video tapes was much higher on the surface hangs and much higher at Mermaid Reef. There were many fewer sharks seen at Scott Reef and these occurred much later in tape sets (generally over half-way through the tape), indicating that they were less abundant there. In particular, the sharks more valuable for the trade in fins (Silvertip Whalers Carcharhinus albimarginatus, Scalloped Hammerheads Sphyrna lewini) were not sighted at Scott Reef, but were relatively abundant at Mermaid Reef. One of the few Grey reef sharks seen at Scott Reef had a wound in its left jaw that may have been caused by fishing gear. There were clear differences amongst habitats in terms of the species composition sighted on tapes. Silvertip whalers (C. albimarginatus) were seen only in deeper waters, and White-tip Reef sharks (Triaenodon obesus) were only seen on the seabed mostly in the lagoons and reef edges. The Grey Reef Shark (C. amblyrhynchos) was seen in all habitats sampled, at the surface and on the bottom, but more commonly outside the lagoons. The largest (~3m) Tiger (Galeocerdo cuvieri) and Great Hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) sharks were sighted on one BRUVS in Mermaid Reef Lagoon. The northern top section of Mermaid Reef had an abundant and diverse fauna of Grey Reef, Silvertip and Scalloped Hammerhead sharks that were visibly associated with schools of Rainbow Runners (Elegatis bipinnulatus), pelagic surgeonfish (Naso hexacanthus/lopezi) and long-toms (Strongylura spp). Single individuals of the poorly-known Thresher Shark (Alopias pelagicus), Sicklefin Hound Shark (Hemitriakis spA) and Fossil Shark (Hemipristis elongata) were sighted on tapes, with the remaining species comprising Tawny (Nebrius ferrugineus) and Leopard (Stegastoma fasciatum) sharks. Few sharks fed on the bait canisters. Coarse comparisons of shark images with scale grids on the bait arms indicated the possibility that Grey Reef and Silvertip Whalers seen on the surface baited hangs in very deep water were smaller than those seen on bottom-set BRUVS in 40-70m, but this requires further image analysis. Few shark targets were seen on the stereo-video sets, and the accurate measurements of those sharks with Vision Metrology Software was not completed at the time of writing this draft report. It is recommended that further studies of these reefs, and other localities within and outside the MOU Box, are undertaken to ascertain the importance of habitat and effects of fishing in determining shark abundance. It is possible that multiple sightings of up to 6 S.lewini at one time are evidence for aggregations of these Scalloped Hammerheads occurring at Mermaid Reef, similar to the large aggregations known elsewhere in the Indian Ocean.
Fish, shark, ray and benthos biodiversity surveys around remote Timor Sea Shoals
공공데이터포털
Cappo, Heyward, Speare GOALS: To map the benthic habitats, and record the associated fish, shark and ray faunas, of the major clusters of Timor Sea shoals at 3 depth zones : 20-30m, 40-60m and 90-110m. APPROACH: Towed camera footage and real-time seabed classifications [substratum,major benthic groups present (eg seagrass,sponge gardens, gorgonians, hard corals, occurrence of individual benthic animal (eg crabs, starfish, clams)] has been obtained from 3 shoals near Evans Shoal, 6 Karmt shoals and 6 Sahul shoals ; as well as 4 adjacent sites in 96-100m on the continental shelf. BRUVS have been deployed at these same 3 depth zones: 20-30m, 40-60m and 90-110m at 3 shoals near Evans Shoal, 6 Karmt shoals and 6 Sahul shoals; as well as 4 adjacent sites in 96-100m on the shelf. 6 BRUVS were set in a line and towed camera footage was obtained during 3 replicate tows amongst this set of BRUVS. Multivariate statistics will be used to explore associations amongst fish and the benthic habitats they are found in. HIGHLIGHTS TO DATE: · Shallows dominated by extraordinarily rich benthos down to >70m · Shallows have moderately diverse fish faunas, lacking large economically-important sharks, serranids, lutjanids and lethrinids · Deepest zones have most abundant fauna of larger fish in these 3 families · Sharks notably absent c.f. other similar regions (eg Rowley Shoals), and most seen were pups · Several species of lutjanid and serranid recorded for first time in Aust. waters · New photographs obtained of species never filmed underwater before (eg Wattsia, Epinephelus morrhua) · Juvenile lethrinids abunadnt in dense seagrass beds at depth · Seagrass detritus visible down to 100m
Oceanic Shoals Commonwealth Marine Reserve - Pelagic baited camera surveys (stereo-BRUVS)
공공데이터포털
This dataset derives from deployments of pelagic baited camera systems (stereo-BRUVS) conducted within the Oceanic Shoals Commonwealth Marine Reserve (CMR) in the Timor Sea during September and October 2012 onboard the RV Solander. This resource comprises species lists and relative abundance data (measured as MaxN, the maximum number of individuals of a given species captured in any one frame) for 116 sampling sites surveyed across three focal areas. The Oceanic Shoals Commonwealth Marine Reserve survey was undertaken as an activity within the Australian Government's National Environmental Research Program Marine Biodiversity Hub and was the key component of Research Theme 4 - Regional Biodiversity Discovery to Support Marine Bioregional Plans. Hub partners involved in the survey included the Australian Institute of Marine Science, Geoscience Australia, the University of Western Australia, Museum Victoria and the Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory. Data acquired during the survey included: multibeam sonar bathymetry and acoustic backscatter; sub-bottom acoustic profiles; physical samples of seabed sediments, infauna and epibenthic biota; towed underwater video and still camera observations of seabed habitats; baited video observations of demersal and pelagic fish, and; oceanographic measurements of the water column from CTD (conductivity, temperature, depth) casts and from deployment of sea surface drifters. Further information on the survey is available in the post-survey report published as Geoscience Australia Record 2013/38: Nichol, S.L., Howard, F.J.F., Kool, J., Stowar, M., Bouchet, P., Radke, L.,Siwabessy, J., Przeslawski, R., Picard, K., Alvarez de Glasby, B., Colquhoun, J., Letessier, T. & Heyward, A. 2013. Oceanic Shoals Commonwealth Marine Reserve (Timor Sea) Biodiversity Survey: GA0339/SOL5650 - Post Survey Report. Record 2013/38. Geoscience Australia: Canberra. (GEOCAT #76658).