Locations where an assessment of riverbank protection fencing has been undertaken and the exact spatial location of fences is unknown. The linework is based on river linework - it does not show the spatial location of fences. Selecting a point along the linework will indicate if there is a fence which protects the river bank and may indicate the condition of the fence. It should be noted that linework will appear where an assessment of riverbank protection fencing has been undertaken, even if no fence is present at that location. Left and right bank are relative to an observer facing downstream. This dataset was formerly known as Foreshore Conditions - Assessment of Right Bank Protection Fencing (DOW-047)

Spatial linework of river fencing. While the dataset has been prepared by the Department of Water, it contains information from State and federally funded foreshore assessment projects conducted at different times by Natural Resource Management groups with support from DOW regional offices. The Department of Water accepts no responsibility for collecting or updating this data but some known errors are being addressed. Foreshore Conditions - Fencing Linework (DOW-060)

River foreshore condition of the left bank, assessed and classed using the Pen-Scott classification method. The Pen-Scott method is a standardised rating technique that classifies foreshore areas along a gradient from pristine (A grade) through to D grade, connoting a ditch. The four grades are further divided into three sub-categories per grade, i.e. A1, A2 and A3. A1: Pristine A2: Near pristine A3: Slightly disturbed B1: Degraded – weed infested B2: Degraded – heavily weed infested B3: Degraded – weed dominated C1: Erosion prone C2: Soil exposed C3: Eroded D1: Ditch - eroding D2: Ditch – feely eroding D3: Drain – weed dominated See specific reports for more information and pictorial examples. See Pen, L.J. and Scott, M. (1995) Stream foreshore assessment in farming areas. Blackwood Catchment Coordinating Group and Water and Rivers Commission (1999) River Restoration Reports No. RR2 and RR3 for foreshore condition assessment methods. Left and right bank are relative to an observer facing downstream. DISCLAIMER: While the dataset has been prepared by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, it contains information from State and federally funded foreshore assessment projects conducted at different times by Natural Resource Management groups with support from DWER regional offices. It should be noted that for any given location, the data provides a ‘snapshot’ of the attributes recorded at one specific time. Any information or representation expressed or implied in this database is made in good faith and on the basis that the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any information or representation referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained to verify the information contained in this database before applying to particular circumstances. The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation accepts no responsibility for collecting or updating this data but some known errors are being addressed. This dataset was formerly known as Foreshore Conditions - Left Bank Condition (DOW-048)

River foreshore condition of the right bank, assessed and classed using the Pen-Scott classification method. The Pen-Scott method is a standardised rating technique that classifies foreshore areas along a gradient from pristine (A grade) through to D grade, connoting a ditch. The four grades are further divided into three sub-categories per grade, i.e. A1, A2 and A3. A1: Pristine A2: Near pristine A3: Slightly disturbed B1: Degraded – weed infested B2: Degraded – heavily weed infested B3: Degraded – weed dominated C1: Erosion prone C2: Soil exposed C3: Eroded D1: Ditch - eroding D2: Ditch – feely eroding D3: Drain – weed dominated See specific reports for more information and pictorial examples. See Pen, L.J. and Scott, M. (1995) Stream foreshore assessment in farming areas. Blackwood Catchment Coordinating Group and Water and Rivers Commission (1999) River Restoration Reports No. RR2 and RR3 for foreshore condition assessment methods. Left and right bank are relative to an observer facing downstream. DISCLAIMER: While the dataset has been prepared by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, it contains information from State and federally funded foreshore assessment projects conducted at different times by Natural Resource Management groups with support from DWER regional offices. It should be noted that for any given location, the data provides a ‘snapshot’ of the attributes recorded at one specific time. Any information or representation expressed or implied in this database is made in good faith and on the basis that the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any information or representation referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained to verify the information contained in this database before applying to particular circumstances. The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation accepts no responsibility for collecting or updating this data but some known errors are being addressed. This dataset was formerly known as Foreshore Conditions - Right Bank Condition (DOW-049)

Points of River Access as found in the river foreshore assessment. DISCLAIMER: While the dataset has been prepared by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, it contains information from State and federally funded foreshore assessment projects conducted at different times by Natural Resource Management groups with support from DWER regional offices. It should be noted that for any given location, the data provides a ‘snapshot’ of the attributes recorded at one specific time. Any information or representation expressed or implied in this database is made in good faith and on the basis that the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any information or representation referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained to verify the information contained in this database before applying to particular circumstances. The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation accepts no responsibility for collecting or updating this data but some known errors are being addressed. This dataset was formerly known as Foreshore Conditions - River Access (DOW-052)

Points of Erosion as found in the river foreshore assessment. DISCLAIMER: While the dataset has been prepared by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, it contains information from State and federally funded foreshore assessment projects conducted at different times by Natural Resource Management groups with support from DWER regional offices. It should be noted that for any given location, the data provides a ‘snapshot’ of the attributes recorded at one specific time. Any information or representation expressed or implied in this database is made in good faith and on the basis that the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any information or representation referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained to verify the information contained in this database before applying to particular circumstances. The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation accepts no responsibility for collecting or updating this data but some known errors are being addressed. This dataset was formerly known as Foreshore Conditions - Erosion (DOW-045)

Points of Interest as found in the river foreshore assessment. DISCLAIMER: While the dataset has been prepared by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, it contains information from State and federally funded foreshore assessment projects conducted at different times by Natural Resource Management groups with support from DWER regional offices. It should be noted that for any given location, the data provides a ‘snapshot’ of the attributes recorded at one specific time. Any information or representation expressed or implied in this database is made in good faith and on the basis that the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any information or representation referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained to verify the information contained in this database before applying to particular circumstances. The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation accepts no responsibility for collecting or updating this data. The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation accepts no responsibility for collecting or updating this data but some known errors are being addressed. This dataset was formerly known as Foreshore Conditions - Points of Interest (DOW-051)

Point locations of specified weeds as found in the river foreshore assessment. DISCLAIMER: While the dataset has been prepared by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, it contains information from State and federally funded foreshore assessment projects conducted at different times by Natural Resource Management groups with support from DWER regional offices. It should be noted that for any given location, the data provides a ‘snapshot’ of the attributes recorded at one specific time. Any information or representation expressed or implied in this database is made in good faith and on the basis that the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any information or representation referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained to verify the information contained in this database before applying to particular circumstances. The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation accepts no responsibility for collecting or updating this data, some known errors are being addressed. This dataset was formerly known as Foreshore Conditions - Weeds (DOW-053)

The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation produces floodplain mapping of rivers and major watercourses and provides floodplain development advice to ensure that proposed floodplain development has adequate flood protection and does not impact on the existing flood regime of the area. This advice is related to major river flooding only. Other issues, such as stormwater drainage and environmental and ecological considerations are not addressed. This dataset contains the location of levee banks (polylines) that mitigate the risk of flooding to the community and reduce potential property damage during major flood events. Note: To see the full scope of the floodplain mapping, 12 dataset layers are required to be loaded in the following order: FLOODPLAIN DATASET LAYERS: FPM Flood Level Points (m AHD) FPM Flood Level Contours (m AHD) FPM 1 in 100 (1%) AEP Floodway and Flood Fringe Line FPM Extent of Flooding FPM Levee Banks FPM Location of Cross Sections FPM 1 in 100 (1%) AEP Floodplain Development Control Area FPM Map Index FPM Bridges FPM Special Development Condition Area FPM 1 in 100 (1%) AEP Floodway and Flood Fringe Area FPM Floodplain Area The dataset covers the following areas: Avon River - Northam Townsite. Capel River - Capel Townsite. Cohn Creek - merredin Townsite. Corrigin Townsite. Exmouth Townsite. Five Mile Brook - Bunbury Townsite. Gascoyne River - Carnarvon Townsite. Greenough River – Indian Ocean to Walkaway. Serpentine River - North of Lake Amarillo. Vasse-Wonnerup Estuaries, Broadwater & New River - Busselton Townsite. Glossary: Annual exceedance probability (AEP) - the likelihood of occurrence of a flood of a given size or larger in any one year; usually expressed as a percentage. 1 in 100 AEP flood - this means that there is a 1 in 100 (or 1%) chance of a flow of this size or larger occurring in any one year. This flood has a 50% chance of being experienced at least once in a person's lifetime. The 1 in 100 AEP flood has been generally adopted in Australia and overseas as the basis for floodplain management planning. Floodplain - the portion of a river valley next to the river channel which is covered with water when the river overflows its banks during major river flows. The term also applies to land adjacent to estuaries which is subject to flooding. Australian Height Datum (AHD) - is a geodetic datum for altitude measurement in Australia. It was adopted in 1971 by the National Mapping Council as the datum to which all vertical control for mapping is to be referred. The datum is based on the mean sea level (1966-1968) being assigned the value 0.000m on the Australian Height Datum (AHD) at 30 tide gauges around the coast of the Australian continent. This dataset was formerly known as FPM Levee Banks (DOW-034)

The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation produces floodplain mapping of rivers and major watercourses and provides floodplain development advice to ensure that proposed floodplain development has adequate flood protection and does not impact on the existing flood regime of the area. This advice is related to major river flooding only. Other issues, such as stormwater drainage and environmental and ecological considerations are not addressed. Both the floodway and flood fringe make up the 1 in 100 (1%) annual exceedance probability (AEP) floodplain, however there are areas where the floodplain exists, but the floodway and flood fringe does not. In such situations, a different floodplain management strategy applies (for example, the Swan River between the Narrows and Canning Bridges). This dataset contains four lines - Floodway limit, Extent of 1 in 100 (1%) AEP flooding, Extent of floodway & Extent of study. The Floodway limit, Extent of floodway and Extent of 1 in 100 (1%) AEP Flooding and Extent of study line types are boundaries which appropriately overlay over the "FPM 1 in 100 (1%) AEP Floodway and Flood Fringe Areas" (polygon) dataset. Note: To see the full scope of the floodplain mapping, 12 dataset layers are required to be loaded in the following order: FLOODPLAIN DATASET LAYERS: FPM Flood Level Points (m AHD) FPM Flood Level Contours (m AHD) FPM 1 in 100 (1%) AEP Floodway and Flood Fringe Line FPM Extent of Flooding FPM Levee Banks FPM Location of Cross Sections FPM 1 in 100 (1%) AEP Floodplain Development Control Area FPM Map Index FPM Bridges FPM Special Development Condition Area FPM 1 in 100 (1%) AEP Floodway and Flood Fringe Area FPM Floodplain Area The dataset covers the following areas: Avon River – Toodyay, Northam, York and Beverley Townsites. Blackwood River – Augusta, Bridgetown, Nannup and Boyup Brook Townsites. Brunswick River - Greater Bunbury Coblinine River & Dorderyemunning Creek - Wagin Townsite. Collie River - Collie Townsite. Chapman River – Geraldton Townsite. Denmark River – Denmark Townsite. Gascoyne River - Carnarvon Townsite and the Lower Gascoyne. Gribble Creek - Kalgoorlie Townsite. Harding River - Roebourne Townsite. Irwin River - Dongara Townsite. Lower Collie River - Greater Bunbury. Preston River - Donnybrook Townsite. Serpentine River, Peel, Birrega & Oaklands Drains, Murray River and the Peel Inlet / Harvey Estuary - Peel Inlet / Harvey Estuary to Pinjarra and south to the Darling Scarp (Murray River) and Peel Inlet / Harvey Estuary to Wellard (Peel Main Drain), east to South Western Highway (Serpentine River) and north to Wungong Brook (Birrega Drain). Swan River, Canning River and Tributaries: Perth - Fremantle to Walyunga National Park (Swan River) and Canning Bridge to Brookton Highway (Canning River). Tributaries include Bennett Brook, Blackadder Creek, Ellen Brook, Helena River, Henley Brook, Jane Brook, St Leonards Creek, Susannah Brook (Swan River) and Southern River/ Wungong Brook (Canning River). Toby Inlet – Quindalup Townsite. Vasse-Wonnerup Estuaries, Broadwater and New River - Busselton Townsite. For further information on flooding and floodplain management in Western Australia, please refer to our Water Facts publications: Flooding in Western Australia (Water facts 13) and Floodplain Management (Water facts 14). This information is available at the following addresses: https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2022-11/Water-facts-13-Flooding-in-Western-Australia.pdf https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2022-11/Water-facts-14-Floodplain-management.pdf Glossary: Annual exceedance probability (AEP) - the likelihood of occurrence of a flood of a given size or larger in any one year; usually expressed as a percentage. 1 in 100 AEP flood - this means that there is a 1 in 100 (or 1%) chance of a flow of this size or larger occurring in any one year. This flood has a 50% chance of being experienced at least once in a person's lifetime. The 1 in 100 AEP flood has been