Alberta Municipal Affairs produces 13 measures related to specific aspects of a municipality’s governance, finances or community. The following resources provides a year over year analysis of indicator results as a function of municipalities. This analysis is provided for informational purposes only and users are encouraged to check out the Municipal Indictors Reports under the related tab before drawing conclusions from this data.

The data in this publication provides an overview of trends in development applications processed by the 152 councils in NSW. In 2006, the Department of Planning introduced a new system for regular performance reporting on the local development planning system, based on development application data collected by councils. This new system will have important long term benefits for State and local government, the development industry and the community. Performance data on local development assessment will assist in ensuring that the legislative framework, planning policy and planning practice are all functioning effectively. In particular, it will help to: monitor the performance of councils in planning and development matters monitor the performance of State agency referrals and integrated approvals monitor key aspects of planning and development assessment systems and identify areas where further streamlining of current procedures and practices could occur assist in early identification of emerging trends and provide a lead for ongoing system improvement and management assist in improving the public accountability of the system by establishing performance measures and benchmarks based on comparable data available. The information contained in this report was collected by surveying all councils on development applications (DAs), complying development certificates (CDCs) and postdevelopment consent (building and subdivision) certificates processed during 2005–06. Prior to this survey, the only published data on planning and development matters was the Comparative Information on NSW Local Government Councils produced annually by the Department of Local Government, which provides key performance indicators for various local government operations. The four broad performance indicators for planning and development services contained in the Department of Local Government comparative information are: number of DAs determined mean time in calendar days for determining DAs median time in calendar days for determining DAs legal expenses to total planning and development costs. The Department of Planning’s Local Development Performance Monitoring supplements this comparative information by focusing specifically on development assessment matters dealt with by local government. The range of information collected through the Department of Planning’s performance reporting system is much more comprehensive than that contained in the Comparative Information on NSW Local Government Councils publication and covers the following areas: volume of applications lodged and determined staff involved in DA processing time taken to determine DAs by estimated development value value of approved DAs nature of DA determinations modifications and reviews court cases and legal expenses certificates issued post-development consent obstacles to efficient DA processing council initiatives to improve DA processing.

This data was collected biaannually from divisions at the Department reasonsible for tracking performance indicators connected to Agency activities. Each measure reflects a particular aspect of agency service operations that the City’s Commissionersand agency heads viewed as key public service areas and criticial objectives connected to policy priorities and operational strategies. These metrics were developed through a collaboration between the Mayor’s Office of Operations and the senior managers of each agency. Results are compared to pre-stated targets or to performance for previous reporting periods. Use ‘CSV for Excel’ when downloading this dataset and then sort in alphabetical order by Agency.

This dataset contains select monthly performance statistics that DOI regularly reports to the Mayor's Office of Operations for 2010 - 2015. This dataset includes several indicators that are cummulated for the Mayor's Management Reports, such as the including numbers of complaints received by the Agency and the numbers of arrests made. This dataset also includes monthly statistics on the Agency's outreach efforts (anticorrupion and whistleblower lectures) as well customer service indicators (such as the number of emails received by the Agency).

,The report contains thirteen (13) performance metrics for City's workforce development programs. Each metric can be breakdown by three demographic types (gender, race/ethnicity, and age group) and the program target population (e.g., youth and young adults, NYCHA communities) as well.,This report is a key output of an integrated data system that collects, integrates, and generates disaggregated data by Mayor's Office for Economic Opportunity (NYC Opportunity). Currently, the report is generated by the integrated database incorporating data from 18 workforce development programs managed by 5 City agencies.,There has been no single "workforce development system" in the City of New York. Instead, many discrete public agencies directly manage or fund local partners to deliver a range of different services, sometimes tailored to specific populations. As a result, program data have historically been fragmented as well, making it challenging to develop insights based on a comprehensive picture. To overcome it, NYC Opportunity collects data from 5 City agencies and builds the integrated database, and it begins to build a complete picture of how participants move through the system onto a career pathway.,Each row represents a count of unique individuals for a specific performance metric, program target population, a specific demographic group, and a specific period. For example, if the Metric Value is 2000 with Clients Served (Metric Name), NYCHA Communities (Program Target Population), Asian (Subgroup), and 2019 (Period), you can say that "In 2019, 2,000 Asian individuals participated programs targeting NYCHA communities.,Please refer to the Workforce Data Portal for further data guidance (https://workforcedata.nyc.gov/en/data-guidance), and interactive visualizations for this report (https://workforcedata.nyc.gov/en/common-metrics).,

The LDPM data provides an outline of the performance of the NSW planning system and information on local and regional development determined by councils, private certifiers and joint regional planning panels. Councils provide the Department with information on each DA and Section 96 modification application (S96) determined by council, and on CDC's determined by council or private certifiers. This is supplemented by information from joint regional planning panels. However, the majority of the data continues to come from councils. The department issued councils with a template for data and explanatory material including data definitions. Councils generally extract their information from DA tracking databases or, for smaller country councils, DA registers. Data analysis was undertaken by the Department using standard calculations (for a detailed explanation, refer to the "Data Quality Statement" tab of the Summary Data attached as a resource to this data set ).

The LDPM data provides an outline of the performance of the NSW planning system and information on local and regional development determined by councils, private certifiers and joint regional planning panels. Councils provide the Department with information on each DA and Section 96 modification application (S96) determined by council, and on CDC's determined by council or private certifiers. This is supplemented by information from joint regional planning panels. However, the majority of the data continues to come from councils. The department issued councils with a template for data and explanatory material including data definitions. Councils generally extract their information from DA tracking databases or, for smaller country councils, DA registers. Data analysis was undertaken by the Department using standard calculations (for a detailed explanation, refer to the "Data Quality Statement" tab of the Summary Data attached as a resource to this data set ).

The annual City of Austin Community Survey measures success in key areas of our Strategic Plan and other City priorities. This data comes from a third party that administers the survey on behalf of the city. The city uses this information for performance measurement. This is a small portion of the full community survey dataset that can be found here: https://data.austintexas.gov/City-Government/Strategic-Measure_-Dataset-Name-/tpkc-tthx This data set is intended to power visualizations for related measures in the strategic plan. Thirty one strategic measures are reported using this data set. View more details and insights related to this data set on the story pages: https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/vhpk-mfsd https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/rzhz-fjps https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/3dbr-g3ga https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/ecc5-fpih https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/yigs-zznh https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/4peq-swgv https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/kgai-y8vi https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/fb9k-gfz5 https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/epgk-j68z https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/hvdf-7j4n https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/nfcx-g3j5 https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/p2hz-spmf https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/su8r-wr2c https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/vdhi-bz8h https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/en8w-pzwk https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/h3ch-7b65 https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/3rz5-26z3 https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/jsbv-h3zh https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/e8bv-yc47 https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/nk97-it22 https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/4uke-bhq2 https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/6ywm-cejy https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/iq8c-z5dc https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/rs7k-ptem https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/ca5r-kdf5 https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/adg9-7aik https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/vwkq-mns4 https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/ezzw-84wr https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/vrqf-nr4j https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/ucfh-heru https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/rine-sac9

The LDPM data provides an outline of the performance of the NSW planning system and information on local and regional development determined by councils, private certifiers and joint regional planning panels. Councils provide the Department with information on each DA and Section 96 modification application (S96) determined by council, and on CDC's determined by council or private certifiers. This is supplemented by information from joint regional planning panels. However, the majority of the data continues to come from councils. The department issued councils with a template for data and explanatory material including data definitions. Councils generally extract their information from DA tracking databases or, for smaller country councils, DA registers. Data analysis was undertaken by the Department using standard calculations (for a detailed explanation, refer to the "Data Quality Statement" tab of the Summary Data attached as a resource to this data set ).