not_specified

for a copy of this paper please contact the Yukon Geological Survey; geology@gov.yk.ca.

for a copy of this paper please contact the Yukon Geological Survey; geology@gov.yk.ca.

The White River copper deposit, in upper Triassic Nikolai Greenstone of southwestern Yukon, is representative of the native copper-basalt association. Native copper and chalcocite are the association. Native copper and chalcocite are the most abundant ore minerals, but a substantial amount of bornite is known, as well as lesser amounts of chalcopyrite, pyrite, digenite, covellite, cuprite and native silver. These minerals are found in crosscutting fractures, amygdules, gas release tubes, small crackle zones, and as local disseminations in basalt; and although concentrated near the margins of a single glomeroporphyritic unit, are neither confined to that unit nor to a single zone within it. Two stages of copper mineralization are postulated: Stage I mineralization is thought to account for most of the native copper as a product of continental weathering of Nikolai basalts. Stage II mineralization is a much later event characterized by copper sulphides in crosscutting structures. Native copper and copper sulphides of Stage II appear to form a stable and primary product of a low grade (regional) metamorphism indicated by such minerals as chlorite, epidote, prehnite, pumpellyite, calcite analcite and apophyllite which have essentially the same mode of occurrence as primary copper minerals. Consequently, metamorphism (prehnite-pumpellyite facies) is interpreted to have been the mineralizing process. Whole-rock potassium-argon dating suggests an age no older than 120 million years for the metamorphic mineralizing event; hence, stage II mineralization post-dated host rock formation by at least 80 million years. It is probabe that many other copper occurrences in Nikolai Greenstone have formed in a similar manner. Also, it is likely that some of these mineralizing fluids could have moved higher in the stratigraphic sequence and precipitated copper minerals in other units.

not_specified

The Minto and Williams Creek copper (-gold) deposits in western Yukon are hosted by variably deformed Early Jurassic (198-197 Ma; U-Pb) plutonic rocks and to a lesser extent strongly metamorphosed supracrustal rocks. These rocks are pendants and schlieren within slightly younger (197 Ma; U-Pb), intermediate-composition intrusive phases of the Granite Batholith. Chalcopyrite and bornite are disseminated and also occur as stringers in these rocks. Alteration muscovite associated with late quartz-feldspar-epidote veins gives a 182 Ma Ar-Ar age. Geobarometry on postmineral intrusive phases in the area indicate that they were emplaced at a depth of >9 km. Hornblende geochemical studies of plutonic and meta-plutonic host rocks at Minto and Williams Creek indicate that they formed in a continental magmatic arc setting. Cu/Au ratios and field observations indicate that supergene mobility of copper was more extensive at Williams Creek than at Minto. Our results indicate that the two deposits represent variations on typical copper (-gold) porphyry deposits.

A new research project was begun in 2002, aimed at better understanding the nature and origin of copper-gold mineralization and its main host rocks at the Minto and Williams Creek (Carmacks Copper) deposits in west-central Yukon. This will also help to further constrain exploration models both on a property and a regional scale. Field work in 2002 confirmed that the main host rocks for both deposits are variably deformed plutonic rocks (diorite and quartz diorite at Williams Creek and mainly granodiorite at Minto). Mineralization formed prior to the ductile deformation that has affected these units. Mineralized granodioritic gneiss from Minto and apparently post-mineralization quartz diorite at Williams Creek yield U-Pb ages of ~194 Ma and ~191 Ma, respectively; thus the mineralization appears to have formed at essentially the same time as the host intrusions. Reconnaissance Pb- and S-isotope analyses of sulphide minerals from both deposits also indicate a likely magmatic source for the mineralization.

not_specified

not_specified

not_specified