The highest percentage gold recoveries occurred at mines which screened their feed to minus one inch, used both expanded metal and angle iron riffles on top of nomad matting for every sluice run and fed their runs at recommended feed and water rates. Expanded metal riffles are efficient at recovering placer gold particles finer than 1 mm while angle iron riffles are more efficient at recovering those greater than 1 mm. Slick plates allow gold particles to segregate to the bottom of the pay gravel slurry where they are more readily available for recovery by the riffles. Additional field testing of existing placer operations should be conducted to expand the knowledge of gold recovery at a greater variety of deposit types and recovery equipment such as hydraulic riffles.

A reduced efficiency of gold recovery with decreasing particle size using a sluice box raises the possibility of a very fine gold resource within the Klondike. The grade of fine gold within gravel recovered from the southern Klondike was assessed using a combination of screening and bulk leaching by cyanidation. This approach eliminates the nugget effect and size ranges selected correspond to particle sizes exploitable by different metallurgical methods: <53 µm (cyanidation), 53-125 µm (‘enhanced g’ concentrators), 125-500 µm (sluice boxes). Colluvium, virgin gravel and tailings from various mining operations were collected from a relatively long drainage where accumulation of fine gold could feasibly occur. In all samples, gold <125 µm was negligible. Despite this negative result, this approach to resource evaluation is straightforward and could be applied advantageously in other areas where source mineralization contains fine gold. A distinction should be made between placer gold grains of fine but equant nature derived from proximal mineralization and gold rendered fine and flaky by fluvial transport.

Placer gold mining in Clear Creek extends back to 1900, when the discovery claim was staked. Approximately 129,000 crude ounces (4012 kg) of gold have been reported since 1941 which includes 49,637 crude ounces (1544 kg) obtained by dredging operations (1941 to 1955, and 1981 to 1987). Placer gold morphology ranges from crystalline gold in quartz to rounded nuggets to flattened gold. The largest nugget, recovered from the headwaters of Left Clear Creek, weighed 7 ounces (218 g). Clear Creek valley was filled by ice during the pre-Reid glaciation (early Pleistocene). Pre-Reid glacial drift is preserved as till, resedimented till, and glaciofluvial sediments on the lower slopes along main Clear Creek and parts of Left Clear Creek. Alpine glaciers formed at the headwaters of Left Clear Creek, however most of the moraine deposits have been eroded. During the subsequent Reid and McConnell glacial periods local alpine glaciers formed in the headwaters of Josephine and Big creeks. Alpine glaciers, the pre-Reid ice sheet and their melt waters redistributed the gold in the Clear Creek drainage. The distribution of heavy minerals in Clear Creek drainage is varied. Over the years dredging operations intersected pockets of gravel containing cassiterite, scheelite and galena, but their precise locations were not documented. Contemporary placer mining and our heavy mineral studies have located concentrations of pyrite, arsenopyrite, scheelite and galena, in addition to gold. Exploration for the source of placer gold has resulted in the discovery of numerous gold veins in the surrounding area.

In theory, very fine sediment sampling (<53 microns) has the potential to improve the usefulness of stream sediment data for gold. The key theoretical advantages over traditional techniques are less local sample site variation, improved reproducibility, and the potential to preferentially define anomalies associated with significant bedrock mineralization. An orientation survey is required to test the actual effectiveness of these techniques and to establish practical sampling and processing procedures.

not_specified

One third of the gold and gold-silver deposits in Yukon were examined and sampled in 1980 to establish a framework of geology and rock chemistry from which variations within and between deposits could be detected and evaluated. Lithologic units within the samples were analyzed for Au, Ag, B, Mn, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Tl, Pb, Bi, Sb, Te, W, Hg, Mo and Cd - elements commonly associated with precious metal deposits. A problem which prevented systematic sampling of many deposits is the lack of underground access and the locally intense oxidation of vein outcrops. Three aspects of the rock geochemistry are discussed:: 1) different levels of element concentration in the deposits and implications regarding pathfinder elements; 2) distribution of elements in deposit types; and 3) element distribution in specific deposits. The geology of the deposits is summarized from published works and interpreted in light of recent theories on gold deposits. This report emphasizes common features of the deposits and several genetic models.

The White Channel Gravel (Pliocene) is the most important gold-bearing unit in the world famous Klondike goldfields of west-central Yukon. It is up to 46 m thick and consists of framework-supported, poorly bedded, slightly muddy sandy gravel that was deposited by braided rivers. Historically, this unit is subdivided into a lower 'white gravel' and an upper 'yellow gravel'. The colour of the white gravel is due to an abundance of quartz clasts and an alteration of the sand-mud matrix that has been referred to as 'leaching' or 'bleaching'. Previous researchers concluded that the alteration is hydrothermal in origin, but a review of this research shows that there is no unequivocal evidence supporting hydrothermal alteration. Petrographic examination of in situ samples from both the white and yellow gravel reveals a depositional fabric and an alteration fabric, although the alteration is better developed in the white gravel. The alteration is reinterpreted as the result of weathering, and particularly diagenesis due to groundwater flow.

In the last five years, eroding gold prices, increasing production costs and the depletion of reserves have resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of drilling to evaluate placer deposits. Accurate sampling and deposit evaluation would enable planning for cost-effective mining and reclamation. However, sampling placer gravel accurately is an extremely difficult task due to the nugget effect (inclusion or loss of a single particle of gold) and any errors are compounded by the small size of the drill samples. Additional sampling errors result from contamination, splitting and fire assaying. More placer mine failures can be attributed directly to improper sampling and sample processing practices during property evaluation than to any other cause. There is very little impartial, accurate information available to guide the selection of modern drills. Drillers and their equipment are often selected for their penetration rate or cost-per-foot rather than for sampling accuracy or gold recovery. A brief description of several types of drills including churn, auger, rotary tricone, reverse circulation, Becker hammer, down-the-hole hammer and Sonic drills is summarized in Section 6 from references. Three solid auger drills, two types of fully cased normal circulation (N/C) drills and two types of reverse circulation (R/C) drills were evaluated under typical Yukon field conditions using radioactive placer gold as tracers (radiotracers). A frozen cylindrical core of compacted gravel containing four sizes (1.2-1.7, 0.60-0.84, 0.3-0.42 and 0.15-0.21 mm) (-10+14, -20+28, -35+48 and -65+100 mesh) of radiotracers was placed in 44 drill holes and the holes were redrilled. Hand-held scintillometres were used to track gold losses during drilling, sample recovery and sample processing. Radiotracers lost due to spillage and blow-by around the collar (top) of the hole, and those trapped in drilling equipment (carry-over) were easily located. The results of these tests are summarized Table 1. There was no significant difference between the recovery of the four sizes of gold particles with any of the fully cased nomal circulation, reverse circulation or auger drills tested. Observations and down-hole scintillometre records indicate that the radiotracers did not follow the bit down the hole and were either carried out of the hole or forced onto to the sides of the hole at or above the depth at which the radiotracer core was positioned.

not_specified

In the last five years, eroding gold prices, increasing production costs and the depletion of reserves have resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of drilling to evaluate placer deposits. Accurate sampling and deposit evaluation would enable planning for cost-effective mining and reclamation. However, sampling placer gravel accurately is an extremely difficult task due to the nugget effect (inclusion or loss of a single particle of gold) and any errors are compounded by the small size of the drill samples. Additional sampling errors result from contamination, splitting and fire assaying. More placer mine failures can be attributed directly to improper sampling and sample processing practices during property evaluation than to any other cause. There is very little impartial, accurate information available to guide the selection of modern drills. Drillers and their equipment are often selected for their penetration rate or cost-per-foot rather than for sampling accuracy or gold recovery. A brief description of several types of drills including churn, auger, rotary tricone, reverse circulation, Becker hammer, down-the-hole hammer and Sonic drills is summarized in Section 6 from references. Three solid auger drills and two types of reverse circulation (R/C) drills were evaluated under typical Yukon field conditions using radioactive placer gold as tracers (radiotracers). A frozen cylindrical core of compacted gravel containing four sizes (-10+14, -20+28, -35+48 and -65+100 mesh) of radiotracers was placed in 35 drill holes and the holes were redrilled. Hand-held scintillometers were used to track gold losses during drilling, sample recovery and sample processing. Radiotracers lost due to spillage and blow-by around the collar (top) of the hole, and those trapped in drilling equipment (carry-over) were easily located. The results of these tests are summarized Table 1. There was no significant difference between the recovery of the four sizes of gold particles with any of the reverse circulation or auger drills tested. Observations and down-hole scintillometer records indicate that the radiotracers did not follow the bit down the hole and were either carried out of the hole or forced onto the sides of the hole at or above the depth at which the radiotracer core was positioned.