The study area for this project was Garrapata State Park in northwestern Monterey County, California. Development of Garrapata State Park land by Spanish missionaries began in the late 1700s (Costanoan Rumsen Carmel Tribe 2001). Cattle ranching on the land began in the 1830s with land grants to ranchers, beginning a long stint of grazing on most of the land south of the Carmel River. In 1980, the state of California began purchasing parcels of land and the area was officially classified as a state park in 1985 (Garrapata State Park Monterey Sector 2003).Garrapata State Park encompasses 2,866 acres along the pacific coast, immediately south of Carmel Highlands. The area is largely dominated by steep foothills of the coastal Santa Lucia Range and is dissected by several steep creeks: Wildcat Creek, Malpaso Creek, Soberanes Creek, Doud Creek and Granite Creek. Elevation ranges from sea level to 2,011 ft atop Rocky Ridge. The park also contains an approximately 4.1-mile stretch of coastal bluff, rocky intertidal zone, and beach west of Highway. The park''s Mediterranean climate is characterized by dry summers and cool wet winters and receives approximately 28 inches of mean annual precipitation (PRISM 2012). Wildfire is a prominent disturbance in this landscape; the Soberanes Fire which began in Garrapata State Park in 2016 was one of the largest fires recorded in California history, burning 132,127 acres (CAL Fire 2016).The National Vegetation Classification System allows vegetation to be mapped at three broad levels— physiognomy, biogeography, and floristics—each of which can be broken down into multiple sublevels (USNVC 2020). Floristic-level mapping provides the finest resolution and is the only level to reflect local environmental conditions. Such fine-scale data resolution helps establish a more precise inventory of native and non-native vegetation communities, which benefits land managers interested in protecting valued natural resources, monitoring fuel loads for fire management, and understanding habitat requirements of wildlife. We attempted to map vegetation communities to the alliance sublevel, which is the broadest sublevel at the floristic level of mapping. We did not attempt to map associations, which occur at the level below alliances.Vegetation community mapping comprised preliminary delineation of somewhat homogeneous vegetation stands, field-based classification of alliances and other mapping units, and quality assurance. We first estimated the boundaries of stands using aerial and satellite-derived orthoimagery which were later classified through field observations. Most of the stands we mapped were conformant with previously defined alliances. Non-conformant stands were classified within novel mapping units, defined in Appendix B. We also used novel mapping units for two situations where the exact alliance could not be readily determined in fall; these classes were “Willows” and “Unidentified annual grasses”.We examined aerial and satellite imagery to initially digitize polygons around areas where vegetation looked homogenous and distinct from surrounding areas. We used a mosaic of natural color (red, green, blue [RGB] band) and color infrared (CIR) National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) orthophotos to conduct initial digitizing of vegetation alliance polygons. Polygons were delineated based on areas of visible homogeneity within the landscape; breaks or abrupt changes in color, structure, or relative height of vegetation usually indicated the need to create separate vegetation community polygons. We established minimum mapping units (MMUs) of 0.25 acres for common mapping units and 0.1 acres for uncommon classes, to maximize the level of detail conveyed in vegetation maps given time constraints and clarity of aerial and satellite imagery. The status of each vegetation community polygon was indicated as “unconfirmed” until field crews verified whether initial delineations were correct.Polygons were

,

,

In 2018, the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy (Parks Conservancy) (https://parksconservancy.org), non-profit support partner to the National Park Service (NPS) Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), initiated a fine scale vegetation mapping project in Marin County. The GGNRA includes lands in San Francisco and San Mateo counties, and NPS expressed interest in pursuing fine scale vegetation mapping for those lands as well. The Parks Conservancy facilitated multiple meetings with potential project stakeholders and was able to build a consortium of funders to map all of San Mateo County (and NPS lands in San Francisco). The consortium included the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD), Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST), San Mateo City/County Association of Governments, and various County of San Mateo departments including Parks, Agricultural Weights and Measures, Public Works/Flood Control District, Office of Sustainability, and Planning and Building. Over a 3-year period, the project, collectively referred to as the “San Mateo Fine Scale Veg Map”, has produced numerous environmental GIS products including 1-foot contours, orthophotography, and other land cover maps. A 106-class fine-scale vegetation map was completed in April 2022 that details vegetation communities and agricultural land cover types, including forests, grasslands, riparian vegetation, wetlands, and croplands. The environmental data products from the San Mateo Fine Scale Veg Map are foundational and can be used by organizations and government departments for a wide range of purposes, including planning, conservation, and to track changes over time to San Mateo County''s habitats and natural resources.Development of the San Mateo fine-scale vegetation map was managed by the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy and staffed by personnel from Tukman Geospatial (https://tukmangeospatial.com/), Aerial Information Systems (AIS; http

In 2018, the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy (Parks Conservancy) (https://parksconservancy.org), non-profit support partner to the National Park Service (NPS) Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), initiated a fine scale vegetation mapping project in Marin County. The GGNRA includes lands in San Francisco and San Mateo counties, and NPS expressed interest in pursuing fine scale vegetation mapping for those lands as well. The Parks Conservancy facilitated multiple meetings with potential project stakeholders and was able to build a consortium of funders to map all of San Mateo County (and NPS lands in San Francisco). The consortium included the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD), Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST), San Mateo City/County Association of Governments, and various County of San Mateo departments including Parks, Agricultural Weights and Measures, Public Works/Flood Control District, Office of Sustainability, and Planning and Building. Over a 3-year period, the project, collectively referred to as the “San Mateo Fine Scale Veg Map”, has produced numerous environmental GIS products including 1-foot contours, orthophotography, and other land cover maps. A 106-class fine-scale vegetation map was completed in April 2022 that details vegetation communities and agricultural land cover types, including forests, grasslands, riparian vegetation, wetlands, and croplands. The environmental data products from the San Mateo Fine Scale Veg Map are foundational and can be used by organizations and government departments for a wide range of purposes, including planning, conservation, and to track changes over time to San Mateo County''s habitats and natural resources.Development of the San Mateo fine-scale vegetation map was managed by the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy and staffed by personnel from Tukman Geospatial (https://tukmangeospatial.com/), Aerial Information Systems (AIS; http

Vegetation types in the study area were initially identified using information obtained from previous vegetation mapping efforts in the Carnegie SVRA (HDR 2004, Jones and Stokes 2000, DPR 1980) and the Existing Vegetation(Eveg) maps (USFS 2007) for the study area. Eveg maps were created by the United State Forest Service (USFS) using automated, systematic procedures, remote sensing classification, photo editing and field based observations to efficiently and cost-effectively map large areas with minimal bias. The classification is a provisional system that meets the floristically based level of the National Vegetation Classification Standard hierarchy. Eveg vegetation cover maps are produced at relatively low spatial detail (1:24,000 map scale) to provide a broad overview of existing vegetation in California.The vegetation types were then refined through aerial photograph interpretation using aerial imagery provided to AECOM by DPR (2010) and National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP 2009) aerial imagery to identify areas where vegetation cover may have changed since the previous mapping efforts were completed, or where vegetation boundaries may not have been drawn accurately due to the methodology, classification system, or mapping scale used. AECOM botanists mapped vegetation type polygons in a GIS overlay from aerial photograph interpretation during September and October 2011. Vegetation types were mapped at a fine-scale (1:6,000 map scale) in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperative Vegetation and Habitat Mapping and Classification mapping standards (California Biodiversity Council 2002). The minimum mapping unit is 1 acre for all common vegetation types. All discernible sensitive habitats, including wetland and riparian vegetation types and linear aquatic features (e.g., streams, rivers, ditches) were mapped regardless of size. For woodland vegetation types, trees on the edge of the polygon were included when they were within approximately two average tree canopy widths of the polygon (approximately 30 meters).AECOM then conducted a field verification survey of the study area on December 7 and 8, 2011, to verify, refine, and correct the vegetation types mapped in the office. The vegetation cover and linear aquatic feature GIS data layers created during the prefield mapping exercises were printed on 1 inch = 500 feet scale maps and also loaded onto a Trimble Global Positioning System (GPS) device with the 2010 DPR aerial imagery and compared for consistency with conditions observed on the ground. Areas that deviated from vegetation types mapped from aerial photography were corrected and refined in the field on the hard copy maps and digitally using the GPS device. The boundaries of wetlands and drainages were further refined using data from the wetland delineation conducted in the study area in 2010 (DPR 2010). Representative photographs were taken of each vegetation type.

,

,

,

,