데이터셋 상세
미국
Culvert Verification Images for Elevation-Derived Hydrography in the Upper Shawsheen River Basin, Massachusetts
This dataset consists of culvert verification images from site visits to confirm hydrologic connection in areas of uncertainty in U.S. Geological Survey 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) lidar digital elevation models (DEM) and aerial leaf off orthoimagery to observe ground conditions in the Upper Shawsheen River Basin, Massachusetts.
데이터 정보
연관 데이터
Elevation-Derived Hydrography Layers for the Upper Shawsheen River Basin, Massachusetts
공공데이터포털
This dataset consists of the raster and vector data used to generate elevation-derived hydrography for the 12-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 010700061301 area named the Upper Shawsheen River in Massachusetts. The data release contents are: fdr_010700061301.zip: Contains a GeoTIFF raster used to indicate the predicted direction of flow based on the direction of steepest drop. fac_010700061301.zip: Contains a GeoTIFF raster used to show the number of upstream cells flowing into each one-meter cell. Hydrolines_010700061301.zip: Contains data files for an ESRI polyline shapefile used to enforce drainage in lidar DEM data. Stream_Network_010700061301.zip: Contains data files for an ESRI polyline shapefile representing stream network centerlines derived from lidar DEM data." Sub_Basins_010700061301.zip: Contains data files for an ESRI polygon shapefile representing watershed areas for all stream network centerlines.
Elevation-Derived Hydrography in the Upper Shawsheen River Basin, Massachusetts
공공데이터포털
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC), has compiled Geographic Information Systems (GIS) datasets. The spatial data layers provided in this data release are hydrography data derived from high-resolution lidar digital elevation models (DEM). They include a hydroline polyline shapefile used to hydro-enforce the high-resolution lidar DEM; a stream network centerline polyline shapefile derived from the hydro-enforcement that shows stream location; a sub-basin polygon shapefile derived from the hydro-enforcement representing watershed areas for all stream network centerline polylines; a flow direction raster, predicting the direction of flow based on direction of steepest drop; and a flow accumulation raster, predicting the number of upstream cells flowing into each one-meter cell. Field verification was conducted for locations where the high-resolution lidar digital elevation models were unclear on hydraulic connection. Photographs were captured to confirm the conveyance of flow. The datasets are provided in separate child items.
U.S. Geological Survey field survey data for hydraulic modeling at selected dam-removal and culvert-retrofit sites in the northeastern United States
공공데이터포털
This dataset contains U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) field survey data at nine dam-removal and culvert-retrofit sites in the northeastern United States (Olson and Simeone, 2021). The USGS field data survey are used to support the development of one-dimensional and two-dimensional U.S. Army Corps of Engineer (USACE) Hydrologic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) models for the post-dam removal and culvert-retrofit conditions. The referenced models were used to evaluate fish passage and flood risk along the simulated reaches in the various states simulated. The field survey data consists of Global Navigation Satellite System-derived orthometric heights in the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 and projected horizontal coordinates in the North American Datum of 1983 State Plane for the respective State the sites are located in.
Maine StreamStats Foundation Data Layers
공공데이터포털
The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with Maine Department of Transportation, has compiled a series of GIS datasets to be implemented into the USGS StreamStats application for the State of Maine.These data were compiled from the high-resolution National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) and the Maine Lidar-Derived Watersheds (Sturtevant and Schoen, 2022). By using these datasets users will be able to delineate watersheds with the StreamStats application more accurately than previously possible. The datasets are provided in five separate child items.
Time-series water level and water quality data to accompany Scientific Investigations Report 2018-5040
공공데이터포털
This Data Release serves as a repository for a set of time-series data used in Scientific Investigations Report 2018-5040. The data represent continuous measurements of specific conductance, water temperature, and/or water level (stage), recorded by a variety of types of data loggers during three multi-day interference tests conducted on the Virgin River at Pah Tempe Springs during November 2013, February 2014, and November 2014. The data presented are the raw data downloaded from the data loggers and are organized according to the date of the test and the type and name of the observation site. The Data Release contains 3 items: 1. An explanatory table, "PahTempe_table1.xlsx", which indicates which parameters were collected and on what instrument at each site during a given test 2. The data, "PahTempe_data.zip"; this zipped file contains the raw data logger files in comma-separated values (CSV) format, organized into folders according to the date of the interference pumping test 3. The metadata document, "PahTempe_metadata.xml" Because these data were collected during multi-day interference pumping tests, they do not represent natural hydrologic conditions in the river, springs, or shallow groundwater system. Users of this data are advised to refer to the larger work citation for proper use and interpretation of the data.
Time-series water level and water quality data to accompany Scientific Investigations Report 2018-5040
공공데이터포털
This Data Release serves as a repository for a set of time-series data used in Scientific Investigations Report 2018-5040. The data represent continuous measurements of specific conductance, water temperature, and/or water level (stage), recorded by a variety of types of data loggers during three multi-day interference tests conducted on the Virgin River at Pah Tempe Springs during November 2013, February 2014, and November 2014. The data presented are the raw data downloaded from the data loggers and are organized according to the date of the test and the type and name of the observation site. The Data Release contains 3 items: 1. An explanatory table, "PahTempe_table1.xlsx", which indicates which parameters were collected and on what instrument at each site during a given test 2. The data, "PahTempe_data.zip"; this zipped file contains the raw data logger files in comma-separated values (CSV) format, organized into folders according to the date of the interference pumping test 3. The metadata document, "PahTempe_metadata.xml" Because these data were collected during multi-day interference pumping tests, they do not represent natural hydrologic conditions in the river, springs, or shallow groundwater system. Users of this data are advised to refer to the larger work citation for proper use and interpretation of the data.
Example Groundwater-Level Datasets and Benchmarking Results for the Automated Regional Correlation Analysis for Hydrologic Record Imputation (ARCHI) Software Package
공공데이터포털
This data release provides two example groundwater-level datasets used to benchmark the Automated Regional Correlation Analysis for Hydrologic Record Imputation (ARCHI) software package (Levy and others, 2024). The first dataset contains groundwater-level records and site metadata for wells located on Long Island, New York (NY) and some surrounding mainland sites in New York and Connecticut. The second dataset contains groundwater-level records and site metadata for wells located in the southeastern San Joaquin Valley of the Central Valley, California (CA). For ease of exposition these are referred to as NY and CA datasets, respectively. Both datasets are formatted with column headers that can be read by the ARCHI software package within the R computing environment. These datasets were used to benchmark the imputation accuracy of three ARCHI model settings (OLS, ridge, and MOVE.1) against the widely used imputation program missForest (Stekhoven and Bühlmann, 2012). The ARCHI program was used to process the NY and CA datasets on monthly and annual timesteps, respectively, filter out sites with insufficient data for imputation, and create 200 test datasets from each of the example datasets with 5 percent of observations removed at random (herein, referred to as "holdouts"). Imputation accuracy for test datasets was assessed using normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), which is the root mean square error divided by the standard deviation of the observed holdout values. ARCHI produces prediction intervals (PIs) using a non-parametric bootstrapping routine, which were assessed by computing a coverage rate (CR) defined as the proportion of holdout observations falling within the estimated PI. The multiple regression models included with the ARCHI package (OLS and ridge) were further tested on all test datasets at eleven different levels of the p_per_n input parameter, which limits the maximum ratio of regression model predictors (p) per observations (n) as a decimal fraction greater than zero and less than or equal to one. This data release contains ten tables formatted as tab-delimited text files. The “CA_data.txt” and “NY_data.txt” tables contain 243,094 and 89,997 depth-to-groundwater measurement values (value, in feet below land surface) indexed by site identifier (site_no) and measurement date (date) for CA and NY datasets, respectively. The “CA_sites.txt” and “NY_sites.txt” tables contain site metadata for the 4,380 and 476 unique sites included in the CA and NY datasets, respectively. The “CA_NRMSE.txt” and “NY_NRMSE.txt” tables contain NRMSE values computed by imputing 200 test datasets with 5 percent random holdouts to assess imputation accuracy for three different ARCHI model settings and missForest using CA and NY datasets, respectively. The “CA_CR.txt” and “NY_CR.txt” tables contain CR values used to evaluate non-parametric PIs generated by bootstrapping regressions with three different ARCHI model settings using the CA and NY test datasets, respectively. The “CA_p_per_n.txt” and “NY_p_per_n.txt” tables contain mean NRMSE values computed for 200 test datasets with 5 percent random holdouts at 11 different levels of p_per_n for OLS and ridge models compared to training error for the same models on the entire CA and NY datasets, respectively. References Cited Levy, Z.F., Stagnitta, T.J., and Glas, R.L., 2024, ARCHI: Automated Regional Correlation Analysis for Hydrologic Record Imputation, v1.0.0: U.S. Geological Survey software release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P1VVHWKE. Stekhoven, D.J., and Bühlmann, P., 2012, MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data: Bioinformatics 28(1), 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597.
Basin Characteristic Flow-Conditioned Parameter Grids for Wyoming StreamStats
공공데이터포털
This dataset was produced by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in cooperation with the Wyoming Water Development Office for the purpose of calculating basin characteristics in preparation for the Wyoming StreamStats application. These datasets are raster representations of various environmental, geological, and land use attributes with the Wyoming StreamStats study area and will be served in the Wyoming StreamStats application to describe delineated watersheds. The StreamStats application provides access to spatial analytical tools that are useful for water-resources planning and management, and for engineering and design purposes. The map-based user interface can be used to delineate drainage areas, get basin characteristics and estimates of flow statistics. To aid in parameterization of mechanistic, statistical, and machine learning models of hydrologic systems in the Wyoming StreamStats study area, flow-conditioned parameter grids (FCPGs) have been generated describing upstream basin elevation, slope, level III and IV ecoregion codes, hydrologic regions, land cover classification, waterbodies, first of the month snow water equivalent (Jan-Jun), soil type, average soil permeability, evapotranspiration Spring and Summer, and modeled 30-year normal climatologies of average annual total precipitation, average monthly total precipitation, average annual daily mean temperature, and average monthly daily mean temperature values within the Wyoming StreamStats study area.
Basin Characteristic Flow-Conditioned Parameter Grids for Wyoming StreamStats
공공데이터포털
This dataset was produced by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in cooperation with the Wyoming Water Development Office for the purpose of calculating basin characteristics in preparation for the Wyoming StreamStats application. These datasets are raster representations of various environmental, geological, and land use attributes with the Wyoming StreamStats study area and will be served in the Wyoming StreamStats application to describe delineated watersheds. The StreamStats application provides access to spatial analytical tools that are useful for water-resources planning and management, and for engineering and design purposes. The map-based user interface can be used to delineate drainage areas, get basin characteristics and estimates of flow statistics. To aid in parameterization of mechanistic, statistical, and machine learning models of hydrologic systems in the Wyoming StreamStats study area, flow-conditioned parameter grids (FCPGs) have been generated describing upstream basin elevation, slope, level III and IV ecoregion codes, hydrologic regions, land cover classification, waterbodies, first of the month snow water equivalent (Jan-Jun), soil type, average soil permeability, evapotranspiration Spring and Summer, and modeled 30-year normal climatologies of average annual total precipitation, average monthly total precipitation, average annual daily mean temperature, and average monthly daily mean temperature values within the Wyoming StreamStats study area.
Hydraulic assessment summary at selected real-time pier scour monitoring sites in Idaho, 2020–2022
공공데이터포털
To observe real-time pier scour at three scour-critical sites in Idaho, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with Idaho Transportation Department, installed and operated fixed real-time (15-minute interval) bed elevation scour sonar sensors at three bridge locations associated with U.S. Geological Survey streamflow gaging stations for water years 2020 through 2022. Observed pier scour data during spring runoff (water years 2020–22) were compared to both Coarse Bed and Hydraulic Engineering Circular 18 (HEC-18) general pier scour design equation estimates to better understand how the observed pier scour data compared to design pier scour equation estimates during the same observational periods. As part of the larger study, site-specific geomorphic data and other observations were collected during a single visit to each bridge. Geomorphic data collected during each visit included a Wolman pebble count (Wolman, 1954) to define the median diameter of the streambed material, an estimate of the flow angle of attack (during peak flow conditions), an assessment of pier shape and dimensions, observations of the floodplain, and observations of bridge scour countermeasures. In addition, a GNSS site survey was completed to update the gage datum water surface elevations and determine the elevation of each bridge structure (road deck and low chord elevations). Real-time (15-minute) hydrologic data were available at each USGS streamflow gaging station (both prior to and during this study) and included real-time discharge and water-surface elevation data (U.S. Geological Survey, 2016, 2024a, 2024b, 2024c). The historic USGS discharge measurement data were used to develop peak flow velocity estimates at each site where the velocity is depth averaged over the cross-section. For each peak flow, the velocity was linearly interpolated using observed measurement data collected from each bridge. Depth for each peak flow condition was computed using the difference between the water surface elevation and the computed channel bed elevation at each site. Geomorphic site surveys provided site specific parameters required for the hydraulic assessment.