Mosaic Standards Challenge
공공데이터포털
This repository contains all submissions made to the Mosaic Standards challenge from the period of the challenge opening through December 31st, 2019. The Mosaic Standards Challenge asked the microbiome research community to participate in determining the level of variation due to wet-lab protocols by sequencing a set of samples and providing the resulting files. Each participant ordered one or more kits, where each kit contained five fecal samples and two predetermined DNA mixtures. All samples were identical across all kits; in other words, the samples labled "#1" provided to each lab were identical to each other. Participants in the challenge sequenced any number of the provided samples and provided both the raw sequencing result files, and the details of their protocol. Protocol details were provided by answering a set of pre-specified questions in a metadata spreadsheet upon submission of each sample.
Mosaic Standards Challenge
공공데이터포털
This repository contains all submissions made to the Mosaic Standards challenge from the period of the challenge opening through December 31st, 2019. The Mosaic Standards Challenge asked the microbiome research community to participate in determining the level of variation due to wet-lab protocols by sequencing a set of samples and providing the resulting files. Each participant ordered one or more kits, where each kit contained five fecal samples and two predetermined DNA mixtures. All samples were identical across all kits; in other words, the samples labled "#1" provided to each lab were identical to each other. Participants in the challenge sequenced any number of the provided samples and provided both the raw sequencing result files, and the details of their protocol. Protocol details were provided by answering a set of pre-specified questions in a metadata spreadsheet upon submission of each sample.
A Sensitivity Analysis of Methodological Variables Associated with Microbiome Measurements
공공데이터포털
This repository provides the raw data, analysis code, and results generated during a systematic evaluation of the impact of selected experimental protocol choices on the metagenomic sequencing analysis of microbiome samples. Briefly, a full factorial experimental design was implemented varying biological sample (n=5), operator (n=2), lot (n=2), extraction kit (n=2), 16S variable region (n=2), and reference database (n=3), and the main effects were calculated and compared between parameters (bias effects) and samples (real biological differences). A full description of the effort is provided in the associated publication.
Quantitative Metagenomics Benchmarking Experiment Data Set
공공데이터포털
To assess the variability of low-abundance oligonucleotide detection across sample matrices, we spiked DNA reference standards (meta sequins) into replicate wastewater DNA extracts at logarithmically decreasing mass-to-mass percentages (m/m%) and deeply sequenced them on the Illumina platform. This dataset summarizes the experimental conditions and results of the detection frequencies of those oligonucleotides as well as detailed descriptions of the DNA reference standards used. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Davis, B., P. Vikesland, and A. Pruden. Evaluating Quantitative Metagenomics for Environmental Monitoring of Antibiotic Resistance and Establishing Detection Limits. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 59(12): 6192-6202, (2025).
MetaCompare 2.0: Data used for pipeline benchmarking and source code
공공데이터포털
Dataset includes the SRA accessions of the sequencing data used to benchmark the MetaCompare 2.0 pipeline as well as tables of bacterial taxa and antibiotic resistance genes used to perform the risk assessments. A link to the GitHub page where the pipeline source code can be found is also provided. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Rumi, M., M. Oh, B. Davis, C. Brown, J. Adeesh, P. Vikesland, A. Pruden, and L. Zhang. MetaCompare 2.0: Differential ranking of ecological and human health resistome risks. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. Oxford University Press, OXFORD, UK, 100(12): fiae155, (2024).