데이터셋 상세
미국
Data supporting a spatiotemporal trend analysis of specific conductivity, streamflow, and landscape attributes of selected sub-basins within the Delaware River watershed, 1980 to 2018
This data release makes available three data tables supporting a spatiotemporal analysis of riverine conductivity and streamflow trends within the Delaware River Basin. The listed datasets include baseflow and total flow time series for selected gaged basins, watershed attributes, water quality information and trend analysis results.
데이터 정보
연관 데이터
Data supporting a spatiotemporal trend analysis of specific conductivity, streamflow, and landscape attributes of selected sub-basins within the Delaware River watershed, 1980 to 2018
공공데이터포털
This data release makes available three data tables supporting a spatiotemporal analysis of riverine conductivity and streamflow trends within the Delaware River Basin. The listed datasets include baseflow and total flow time series for selected gaged basins, watershed attributes, water quality information and trend analysis results.
Baseflow estimation and trend and correlation analysis results for East Canyon Creek, Summit and Morgan Counties, Utah
공공데이터포털
East Canyon Creek is a perennial snowmelt-dominated stream that lies in the Snyderville Basin of Summit and Morgan Counties, Utah. Its headwaters begin as McLeod Creek on the eastern slopes of the Wasatch Mountains before joining Kimball Creek to form East Canyon Creek, proper, below the Interstate 80 overpass where it flows north-northwest into East Canyon Reservoir. The reach between the headwaters and East Canyon Reservoir includes three U.S. Geological Survey streamgages that monitor streamflow and specific conductance. The Snyderville Basin Water Reclamation District provides wastewater collection and reclamation services for Park City, Utah, and the surrounding areas and operates a water reclamation facility on East Canyon Creek near Jeremy Ranch. This data release includes daily, monthly, and annual streamflow and estimated baseflow data from three streamgages (10133650, 10133800, 10133980), monthly and annual climatological data from two snow telemetry stations (684, 814), and results of monthly and annual trend and correlation analyses between the 2011 and 2022 water years.
Geographic Data for the Estimation of Peak Flow Statistics for Illinois
공공데이터포털
The U.S. Geological Survey Central Midwest Water Science Center completed a report (Over and others, 2023) documenting methods, results, and applications of an updated flood-frequency study for the State of Illinois. The study developed regional regression equations that relate the peak-flow quantiles and the basin characteristics of selected streamgages in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin, based on data through water year 2017 (a water year is the period from October 1 to September 30 and is designated by the year in which it ends; for example, water year 2017 was from October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017). The data provided through this data release are those digital datasets of basin characteristics that have been collected, tested, and ultimately selected for use in regional regression equations. These datasets consist of raster grid files for slope (slope100.zip), calculated from a published digital elevation model (DEM) (Schafer and Sharpe, 2023), soil slope (stats_slope100.zip) subsetted and resampled from Wolock (1997), a soil texture permeability index (texp_indx_rnd.zip) computed using data from Wolock (1997), land cover (nlcd16_22_23_24.zip) adapted from Yang and others (2018), a basin soil wetness measure (drclass1a.zip) computed from U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2013), and an urbanization fraction (urbthe2010.zip) computed from Theobald 2010 data (Theobald, 2005). Some basin characteristics are not included in this data release as they are easily derived from StreamStats basin delineations themselves, such as basin drainage area. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Illinois Center for Transportation (ICT) and the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), prepared these digital datasets of basin characteristics for use in the Illinois StreamStats application (https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/). Two additional shapefiles are provided: a shapefile of the streamgages (IL_StreamStats_Gages.zip) and a shapefile of the associated delineated streamgage drainage basins (IL_StreamStats_DrainageBasins.zip) used in analysis (Over and others, 2023).
Geographic Data for the Estimation of Peak Flow Statistics for Illinois
공공데이터포털
The U.S. Geological Survey Central Midwest Water Science Center completed a report (Over and others, 2023) documenting methods, results, and applications of an updated flood-frequency study for the State of Illinois. The study developed regional regression equations that relate the peak-flow quantiles and the basin characteristics of selected streamgages in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin, based on data through water year 2017 (a water year is the period from October 1 to September 30 and is designated by the year in which it ends; for example, water year 2017 was from October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017). The data provided through this data release are those digital datasets of basin characteristics that have been collected, tested, and ultimately selected for use in regional regression equations. These datasets consist of raster grid files for slope (slope100.zip), calculated from a published digital elevation model (DEM) (Schafer and Sharpe, 2023), soil slope (stats_slope100.zip) subsetted and resampled from Wolock (1997), a soil texture permeability index (texp_indx_rnd.zip) computed using data from Wolock (1997), land cover (nlcd16_22_23_24.zip) adapted from Yang and others (2018), a basin soil wetness measure (drclass1a.zip) computed from U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2013), and an urbanization fraction (urbthe2010.zip) computed from Theobald 2010 data (Theobald, 2005). Some basin characteristics are not included in this data release as they are easily derived from StreamStats basin delineations themselves, such as basin drainage area. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Illinois Center for Transportation (ICT) and the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), prepared these digital datasets of basin characteristics for use in the Illinois StreamStats application (https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/). Two additional shapefiles are provided: a shapefile of the streamgages (IL_StreamStats_Gages.zip) and a shapefile of the associated delineated streamgage drainage basins (IL_StreamStats_DrainageBasins.zip) used in analysis (Over and others, 2023).
Basin Characteristics Rasters for Delaware StreamStats 2020
공공데이터포털
This dataset was produced in by the Delaware Geological survey in cooperation with the US Geological Survey and Delaware Department of Transportation for the purpose of calculating stream gage basin characteristics in preparation for the Delaware 2020 StreamStats application. These datasets are raster representations of various environmental, geological, and land use attributes within the Delaware StreamStats 2020 study area, and will be served in the Delaware StreamStats 2020 application to describe delineated watersheds. The StreamStats application provides access to spatial analytical tools that are useful for water-resources planning and management, and for engineering and design purposes. The map-based user interface can be used to delineate drainage areas, get basin characteristics and estimates of flow statistics, and more.
Water-quality trends for rivers and streams in the Delaware River Basin using Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season (WRTDS) models, Seasonal Kendall Trend (SKT) tests, and multisource data, Water Year 1978-2018.
공공데이터포털
This data release provides water-quality trends for rivers and streams in the Delaware River Basin determined using the Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season (WRTDS) model and the Seasonal Kendall Trend (SKT) test. Sixteen water-quality parameters were assessed, including nutrients (ammonia, nitrate, filtered orthophosphate, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and unfiltered orthophosphate), major ions (calcium, chloride, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and sulfate), salinity indicators (total dissolved solids and specific conductance), and sediment (total suspended solids and suspended sediment concentration). The child items include the input and output data used in the modeling and testing of water-quality trends. The attached files include the scripts used in these analyses, a readMe files for these scripts and tables summarizing information about the sites used in the analysis. These trends build off the national efforts of Oelsner and others (2017) and Murphy and others (2018), with some variations in data screening and processing. One major divergence from these previous efforts was that screened site-parameter combinations were screened for the longest period of record that passed various temporal and seasonal criteria ("maximum calibration" approach) instead of screening by pre-defined trend periods. An additional difference was that water-quality data were combined from multiple monitoring locations and collecting organizations using hierarchical clustering based on the distance between monitoring locations on the same stream reach (as determined by the National Hydrography Dataset comid). Data that were a part of these "cluster sites" were manually reviewed prior to running SKT and WRTDS. Input data for SKT includes 124 sites (including individual sites and cluster sites) and 1,208 site-parameter combinations. Input data for WRTDS, which required additional screening beyond those used for the SKT test and a paired streamflow gage, includes 62 sites and 476 site-parameter combinations. For both methods, some site-parameter combinations were not run due to the amount of censored data, or the results were rejected due to poor model fit. Trends are reported for four trend periods (1978-2018, 1998-2018, 2003-2018, and 2008-2018), as the available screened data allow, and for the entire screened period of record for each parameter at each site. This collection of trend results leverages the monitoring efforts of many collecting organizations across the Delaware River Basin and can serve to better understand changing water-quality conditions across this basin. References Cited: Murphy, J.C., Farmer, W.H., Sprague, L.A., De Cicco, L.A., and Hirsch, R.M., 2018, Water-quality trends and trend component estimates for the Nation's rivers and streams using Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season (WRTDS) models and generalized flow normalization, 1972-2012: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7TQ5ZS3. Oelsner, G.P., Sprague, L.A., Murphy, J.C., Zuellig, R.E., Johnson, H.M., Ryberg, K.R., Falcone, J.A., Stets, E.G., Vecchia, A.V., Riskin, M.L., De Cicco, L.A., Mills, T.J., Farmer, W.H., 2017, Water-quality trends in the Nation’s rivers and streams 1972–2012—Data preparation, statistical methods, and trend results: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20175006. Shoda, M.E., Murphy, J.C., Falcone, J.A., and Duris, J.W., 2019, Multisource surface-water-quality data and U.S. Geological Survey streamgage match for the Delaware River Basin: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9PX8LZO. National Water Quality Monitoring Council, Water Quality Portal (WQP), https://www.waterqualitydata.us/. Accessed 2020-11-03.
Water-quality trends for rivers and streams in the Delaware River Basin using Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season (WRTDS) models, Seasonal Kendall Trend (SKT) tests, and multisource data, Water Year 1978-2018.
공공데이터포털
This data release provides water-quality trends for rivers and streams in the Delaware River Basin determined using the Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season (WRTDS) model and the Seasonal Kendall Trend (SKT) test. Sixteen water-quality parameters were assessed, including nutrients (ammonia, nitrate, filtered orthophosphate, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and unfiltered orthophosphate), major ions (calcium, chloride, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and sulfate), salinity indicators (total dissolved solids and specific conductance), and sediment (total suspended solids and suspended sediment concentration). The child items include the input and output data used in the modeling and testing of water-quality trends. The attached files include the scripts used in these analyses, a readMe files for these scripts and tables summarizing information about the sites used in the analysis. These trends build off the national efforts of Oelsner and others (2017) and Murphy and others (2018), with some variations in data screening and processing. One major divergence from these previous efforts was that screened site-parameter combinations were screened for the longest period of record that passed various temporal and seasonal criteria ("maximum calibration" approach) instead of screening by pre-defined trend periods. An additional difference was that water-quality data were combined from multiple monitoring locations and collecting organizations using hierarchical clustering based on the distance between monitoring locations on the same stream reach (as determined by the National Hydrography Dataset comid). Data that were a part of these "cluster sites" were manually reviewed prior to running SKT and WRTDS. Input data for SKT includes 124 sites (including individual sites and cluster sites) and 1,208 site-parameter combinations. Input data for WRTDS, which required additional screening beyond those used for the SKT test and a paired streamflow gage, includes 62 sites and 476 site-parameter combinations. For both methods, some site-parameter combinations were not run due to the amount of censored data, or the results were rejected due to poor model fit. Trends are reported for four trend periods (1978-2018, 1998-2018, 2003-2018, and 2008-2018), as the available screened data allow, and for the entire screened period of record for each parameter at each site. This collection of trend results leverages the monitoring efforts of many collecting organizations across the Delaware River Basin and can serve to better understand changing water-quality conditions across this basin. References Cited: Murphy, J.C., Farmer, W.H., Sprague, L.A., De Cicco, L.A., and Hirsch, R.M., 2018, Water-quality trends and trend component estimates for the Nation's rivers and streams using Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge, and Season (WRTDS) models and generalized flow normalization, 1972-2012: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7TQ5ZS3. Oelsner, G.P., Sprague, L.A., Murphy, J.C., Zuellig, R.E., Johnson, H.M., Ryberg, K.R., Falcone, J.A., Stets, E.G., Vecchia, A.V., Riskin, M.L., De Cicco, L.A., Mills, T.J., Farmer, W.H., 2017, Water-quality trends in the Nation’s rivers and streams 1972–2012—Data preparation, statistical methods, and trend results: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20175006. Shoda, M.E., Murphy, J.C., Falcone, J.A., and Duris, J.W., 2019, Multisource surface-water-quality data and U.S. Geological Survey streamgage match for the Delaware River Basin: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9PX8LZO. National Water Quality Monitoring Council, Water Quality Portal (WQP), https://www.waterqualitydata.us/. Accessed 2020-11-03.
Elevation, Flow Accumulation, Flow Direction, and Stream Definition Data in Support of the Illinois StreamStats Upgrade to the Basin Delineation Database
공공데이터포털
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Illinois Center for Transportation and the Illinois Department of Transportation, prepared hydro-conditioned geographic information systems (GIS) layers for use in the Illinois StreamStats application. These data were used to delineate drainage basins and compute basin characteristics for updated peak flow and flow duration regression equations for Illinois. This dataset consists of raster grid files for elevation (dem), flow accumulation (fac), flow direction (fdr), and stream definition (str900) for each 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) area in Illinois merged into a single dataset. There are 51 full or partial HUC 8s represented by this data set: 04040002, 05120108, 05120109, 05120111, 05120112, 05120113, 05120114, 05120115, 05140202, 05140203, 05140204, 05140206, 07060005, 07080101, 07080104, 07090001, 07090002, 07090003, 07090004, 07090005, 07090006, 07090007, 07110001, 07110004, 07110009, 07120001, 07120002, 07120004 (0712003 was combined into this HUC), 07120005, 07120006, 07120007, 07130001, 07130002, 07130003, 07130004, 07130005, 07130006, 07130007, 07130008, 07130009, 07130010, 07130011, 07130012, 07140101, 07140105, 07140106, 07140108, 07140201, 07140202, 07140203, and 07140204.
Specific Conductivity Stream Network Modeling Eastern Kentucky Watershed Data, Code and Analysis HTMLS
공공데이터포털
This data is for 60 water quality monitoring sites in the Right Fork of Beaver Creek watershed in Eastern Kentucky where specific conductivity (SC) was measured quarterly for two years from December 2012 to August 2014. SC was modeled as a function of land use covariates and spatial autocorrelation between sites on the stream network, and by doing so we could compare predictions of the average SC for different portions of the network and identify areas of low and high SC. The htmls files can be opened with a browser such as Internet Explorer or Chrome. This dataset is associated with the following publication: McManus, M., E. DAmico, E. Smith, R. Polinsky, J. Ackerman, and K. Tyler. Variation in stream network relationships and geospatial predictions of watershed conductivity. Freshwater Science. The Society for Freshwater Science, Springfield, IL, 39(4): 1-18, (2020).
A network of 31 Upper Missouri River Basin naturalized water-year (Oct-Sep) streamflow reconstructions spanning years 800-1998 CE
공공데이터포털
Paleohydrologic records provide a valuable perspective on the variability of streamflow and hydroclimate that is critical for water resource planning and placing present day and future conditions into a long-term context. Until now, key insights gained from streamflow reconstructions in the other river basins across the Western U.S. been lacking in the Upper Missouri River Basin due to a lack of extended streamflow records. Here we utilize a new database of naturalized streamflow records for the Upper Missouri and an expanded network of tree-ring records from the region to reconstruct streamflow at 31 gaging locations across the major Mountain Headwaters of the United States’ largest river basin. The database also includes an Upper Missouri Basin Basin composite record of streamflow that is not specific to any streamgage location, but rather summarizes streamflow variability across all the major gaging locations in the Upper Missouri River. The reconstructions explain an average of 68% of the variability in the observed streamflow records and extend records of streamflow to C.E. 886 on average. The network of streamflow reconstructions presented here fills a major geographical void in paleohydrologic understanding and provides important data resources to water managers balancing increasing water demands for hydropower, irrigation, navigation, and ecological resources with increasing flood risk in the basin.