데이터셋 상세
미국
Datasets and scripts used for estimating streamflow and base flow within the nontidal Chesapeake Bay riverine system, water years 2006-15
This U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data release contains estimated daily streamflow and base flow for HUC12 in the nontidal areas of the Chesapeake Bay watershed, monthly average streamflow and base flow, flow statistics, MATLAB scripts, and a document that describes how to create similar datasets in other watersheds. Daily streamflow was estimated for all the nontidal parts of the Chesapeake Bay watershed with the program "Unit Flows in Networks of Channels" (UFINCH; Holtschlag, 2016), together with the observations of measured streamflow at gages at the downstream ends of major rivers. The estimated streamflow was aggregated at the HUC12 level and reformatted as an Optimal Hydrograph Separation (OHS) input file using MATLAB scripts. Base flow was calculated at each HUC12 outlet using the base flow index (BFI) hydrograph separation methods developed by Wahl and Wahl (Wahl and Wahl, 1988; Wahl and Wahl, 1995) and by Eckhardt (Eckhardt, 2005) with the parameter estimation method developed by Collischonn and Fan (Collischonn and Fan, 2013) which are incorporated into the OHS program (Raffensperger and others, 2017). This data release supports the following publication: • Buffington, P.C., and Capel, P.D., 2020, Estimating streamflow and base flow within the nontidal Chesapeake Bay riverine system: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2020-5055, 26 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205055. References cited: • Collischonn, W. and Fan, F.M., 2013, Defining parameters for Eckhardt's digital baseflow filter: Hydrological Processes, v. 27, no. 18, p. 2614-2622, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9391. • Eckhardt, K., 2005, How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation: Hydrological Processes, v. 19, no. 2, p. 507-515, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5675. • Holtschlag, D.J., 2016, UFINCH-A method for simulating unit and daily flows in networks of channels described by NHDPlus using continuous flow data at U.S. Geological Survey streamgages: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2016-5074, 17 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20165074. • Raffensperger, J.P., Baker, A.C., Blomquist, J.D., and Hopple, J.A., 2017, Optimal hydrograph separation using a recursive digital filter constrained by chemical mass balance, with application to selected Chesapeake Bay watersheds: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017-5034, 51 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175034. • Wahl, K.L., and Wahl, T.L., 1988, Effects of regional ground water declines on streamflows in the Oklahoma Panhandle, in Symposium on Water-Use Data for Water Resources Management, Tucson, Arizona, American Water Resources Association, p. 239-249. • Wahl, K.L., and Wahl, T.L., 1995, Determining the flow of Comal Springs at New Braunfels, Texas, Texas Water '95: San Antonio, Texas, American Society of Civil Engineers, p. 77-86, http://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/hydraulics_lab/pubs/PAP/PAP-0708.pdf.
데이터 정보
연관 데이터
Datasets and scripts used for estimating streamflow and base flow within the nontidal Chesapeake Bay riverine system, water years 2006-15
공공데이터포털
This U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data release contains estimated daily streamflow and base flow for HUC12 in the nontidal areas of the Chesapeake Bay watershed, monthly average streamflow and base flow, flow statistics, MATLAB scripts, and a document that describes how to create similar datasets in other watersheds. Daily streamflow was estimated for all the nontidal parts of the Chesapeake Bay watershed with the program "Unit Flows in Networks of Channels" (UFINCH; Holtschlag, 2016), together with the observations of measured streamflow at gages at the downstream ends of major rivers. The estimated streamflow was aggregated at the HUC12 level and reformatted as an Optimal Hydrograph Separation (OHS) input file using MATLAB scripts. Base flow was calculated at each HUC12 outlet using the base flow index (BFI) hydrograph separation methods developed by Wahl and Wahl (Wahl and Wahl, 1988; Wahl and Wahl, 1995) and by Eckhardt (Eckhardt, 2005) with the parameter estimation method developed by Collischonn and Fan (Collischonn and Fan, 2013) which are incorporated into the OHS program (Raffensperger and others, 2017). This data release supports the following publication: • Buffington, P.C., and Capel, P.D., 2020, Estimating streamflow and base flow within the nontidal Chesapeake Bay riverine system: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2020-5055, 26 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20205055. References cited: • Collischonn, W. and Fan, F.M., 2013, Defining parameters for Eckhardt's digital baseflow filter: Hydrological Processes, v. 27, no. 18, p. 2614-2622, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9391. • Eckhardt, K., 2005, How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation: Hydrological Processes, v. 19, no. 2, p. 507-515, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5675. • Holtschlag, D.J., 2016, UFINCH-A method for simulating unit and daily flows in networks of channels described by NHDPlus using continuous flow data at U.S. Geological Survey streamgages: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2016-5074, 17 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20165074. • Raffensperger, J.P., Baker, A.C., Blomquist, J.D., and Hopple, J.A., 2017, Optimal hydrograph separation using a recursive digital filter constrained by chemical mass balance, with application to selected Chesapeake Bay watersheds: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017-5034, 51 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175034. • Wahl, K.L., and Wahl, T.L., 1988, Effects of regional ground water declines on streamflows in the Oklahoma Panhandle, in Symposium on Water-Use Data for Water Resources Management, Tucson, Arizona, American Water Resources Association, p. 239-249. • Wahl, K.L., and Wahl, T.L., 1995, Determining the flow of Comal Springs at New Braunfels, Texas, Texas Water '95: San Antonio, Texas, American Society of Civil Engineers, p. 77-86, http://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/hydraulics_lab/pubs/PAP/PAP-0708.pdf.
Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02070011 - Lower Potomac
공공데이터포털
The Chesapeake Bay Hyper-Resolution Hydrography Database is intended to facilitate analysis of the landscape in the Chesapeake Bay watershed through identification of headwater and other low-order streams or drainage features (e.g. ditches) that, to date, may be absent from existing hydrography data products. A full description of the methodology and accuracy assessment is provided in the accompanying report titled: "Hydrography Mapping Supporting Modeling and Targeted Conservation: Project Overview and Lessons Learned". The data products were developed by the Chesapeake Conservancy and the University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) as part of a 6-year Cooperative Agreement between the Chesapeake Conservancy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and a separate Interagency Agreement between the USGS and the EPA to provide geospatial support to the Chesapeake Bay Program Office. The data release is structured by eight-digit level hydrologic unit codes (HUC8) for the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Each HUC8 contains seven files (see below) and uses the following nomenclature: where HUC_ID and WATERSHED_NAME are placeholders for HUC8 ID(s), and local watershed name(s) (e.g., "Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02050101 - Upper Susquehanna") Data Release Structure: Project Overview and Lessons Learned.pdf (Project overivew, methodology and accuracy assessment) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamLine.zip (Stream Lines) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamPoly.zip (Stream Polygons) huc_[HUC_ID]_agDitches.zip (Agricultural Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_rdDitches.zip (Road Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon1m.tif (Geomorphon 1-meter) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon10m.tif (Geomorphon 10-meter) metadata_[HUC_ID].xml (metadata xml)
Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02070001 - South Branch Potomac
공공데이터포털
The Chesapeake Bay Hyper-Resolution Hydrography Database is intended to facilitate analysis of the landscape in the Chesapeake Bay watershed through identification of headwater and other low-order streams or drainage features (e.g. ditches) that, to date, may be absent from existing hydrography data products. A full description of the methodology and accuracy assessment is provided in the accompanying report titled: "Hydrography Mapping Supporting Modeling and Targeted Conservation: Project Overview and Lessons Learned". The data products were developed by the Chesapeake Conservancy and the University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) as part of a 6-year Cooperative Agreement between the Chesapeake Conservancy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and a separate Interagency Agreement between the USGS and the EPA to provide geospatial support to the Chesapeake Bay Program Office. The data release is structured by eight-digit level hydrologic unit codes (HUC8) for the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Each HUC8 contains seven files (see below) and uses the following nomenclature: where HUC_ID and WATERSHED_NAME are placeholders for HUC8 ID(s), and local watershed name(s) (e.g., "Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02050101 - Upper Susquehanna") Data Release Structure: Project Overview and Lessons Learned.pdf (Project overivew, methodology and accuracy assessment) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamLine.zip (Stream Lines) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamPoly.zip (Stream Polygons) huc_[HUC_ID]_agDitches.zip (Agricultural Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_rdDitches.zip (Road Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon1m.tif (Geomorphon 1-meter) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon10m.tif (Geomorphon 10-meter) metadata_[HUC_ID].xml (metadata xml)
Basin characteristics considered for multiple regression analysis for 1050 selected streamgages in and near Virginia and West Virginia, 2025
공공데이터포털
This child page contains the drainage basin characteristics that were computed for each drainage basin and considered to be potential explanatory variables in multiple regression analysis in the 2025 VA-WV flood-frequency analysis. The six tables are grouped by source datasets and include: 1) Table_9_L3_Ecoregions.txt: Contains area and percent of Level III ecoregions from the Environmental Protection Agency within each basin 2) Table_10_L4_Ecoregions.txt:Contains area and percent of Level IV ecoregions from the Environmental Protection Agency within each basin 3) Table_11_Land_Cover_2019.txt: Contains area and percent of land cover classes from the 2019 National Land Cover Dataset within each basin 4) Table_12_Miscellaneous.txt: Contains miscellaneous information about selected geographic, geometric, and geologic properties of each basin 5) Table_13_Physiography.txt: Contains area and percent of physiographic provinces from Fenneman and Johnson, 1946 within each basin 6) Table_14_Precipitation.txt: Contains the mean annual precipitation from PRISM and the mean precipitation at selected recurrence intervals from NOAA Atlas 14 for each basin 7) Table_15_BC_Evaluation.txt: A subset of 121 of these basin characteristics were evaluated using correlation and scatterplot matrices and results are summarized 8) Table_17_Drainage_Basin_Areas_within_Regions.txt: Contains the total area and percentage of area of each hydrologic regression region within each streamgage drainage basin The associated child page titled "Drainage basin polygons and outlet points for 1050 selected streamgages in and near Virginia and West Virginia, 2025" contains geospatial layers of drainage outlet points and drainage basin boundaries that were generated in this study. These shapefiles can be merged with the basin characteristics files using the Station_ID field.
Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02080110 - Tangier
공공데이터포털
The Chesapeake Bay Hyper-Resolution Hydrography Database is intended to facilitate analysis of the landscape in the Chesapeake Bay watershed through identification of headwater and other low-order streams or drainage features (e.g. ditches) that, to date, may be absent from existing hydrography data products. A full description of the methodology and accuracy assessment is provided in the accompanying report titled: "Hydrography Mapping Supporting Modeling and Targeted Conservation: Project Overview and Lessons Learned". The data products were developed by the Chesapeake Conservancy and the University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) as part of a 6-year Cooperative Agreement between the Chesapeake Conservancy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and a separate Interagency Agreement between the USGS and the EPA to provide geospatial support to the Chesapeake Bay Program Office. The data release is structured by eight-digit level hydrologic unit codes (HUC8) for the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Each HUC8 contains seven files (see below) and uses the following nomenclature: where HUC_ID and WATERSHED_NAME are placeholders for HUC8 ID(s), and local watershed name(s) (e.g., "Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02050101 - Upper Susquehanna") Data Release Structure: Project Overview and Lessons Learned.pdf (Project overivew, methodology and accuracy assessment) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamLine.zip (Stream Lines) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamPoly.zip (Stream Polygons) huc_[HUC_ID]_agDitches.zip (Agricultural Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_rdDitches.zip (Road Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon1m.tif (Geomorphon 1-meter) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon10m.tif (Geomorphon 10-meter) metadata_[HUC_ID].xml (metadata xml)
Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02070004 - Conocoheague
공공데이터포털
The Chesapeake Bay Hyper-Resolution Hydrography Database is intended to facilitate analysis of the landscape in the Chesapeake Bay watershed through identification of headwater and other low-order streams or drainage features (e.g. ditches) that, to date, may be absent from existing hydrography data products. A full description of the methodology and accuracy assessment is provided in the accompanying report titled: "Hydrography Mapping Supporting Modeling and Targeted Conservation: Project Overview and Lessons Learned". The data products were developed by the Chesapeake Conservancy and the University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) as part of a 6-year Cooperative Agreement between the Chesapeake Conservancy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and a separate Interagency Agreement between the USGS and the EPA to provide geospatial support to the Chesapeake Bay Program Office. The data release is structured by eight-digit level hydrologic unit codes (HUC8) for the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Each HUC8 contains seven files (see below) and uses the following nomenclature: where HUC_ID and WATERSHED_NAME are placeholders for HUC8 ID(s), and local watershed name(s) (e.g., "Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02050101 - Upper Susquehanna") Data Release Structure: Project Overview and Lessons Learned.pdf (Project overivew, methodology and accuracy assessment) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamLine.zip (Stream Lines) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamPoly.zip (Stream Polygons) huc_[HUC_ID]_agDitches.zip (Agricultural Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_rdDitches.zip (Road Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon1m.tif (Geomorphon 1-meter) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon10m.tif (Geomorphon 10-meter) metadata_[HUC_ID].xml (metadata xml)
Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02070002 - North Branch Potomac
공공데이터포털
The Chesapeake Bay Hyper-Resolution Hydrography Database is intended to facilitate analysis of the landscape in the Chesapeake Bay watershed through identification of headwater and other low-order streams or drainage features (e.g. ditches) that, to date, may be absent from existing hydrography data products. A full description of the methodology and accuracy assessment is provided in the accompanying report titled: "Hydrography Mapping Supporting Modeling and Targeted Conservation: Project Overview and Lessons Learned". The data products were developed by the Chesapeake Conservancy and the University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) as part of a 6-year Cooperative Agreement between the Chesapeake Conservancy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and a separate Interagency Agreement between the USGS and the EPA to provide geospatial support to the Chesapeake Bay Program Office. The data release is structured by eight-digit level hydrologic unit codes (HUC8) for the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Each HUC8 contains seven files (see below) and uses the following nomenclature: where HUC_ID and WATERSHED_NAME are placeholders for HUC8 ID(s), and local watershed name(s) (e.g., "Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02050101 - Upper Susquehanna") Data Release Structure: Project Overview and Lessons Learned.pdf (Project overivew, methodology and accuracy assessment) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamLine.zip (Stream Lines) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamPoly.zip (Stream Polygons) huc_[HUC_ID]_agDitches.zip (Agricultural Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_rdDitches.zip (Road Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon1m.tif (Geomorphon 1-meter) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon10m.tif (Geomorphon 10-meter) metadata_[HUC_ID].xml (metadata xml)
Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02080107 - York
공공데이터포털
The Chesapeake Bay Hyper-Resolution Hydrography Database is intended to facilitate analysis of the landscape in the Chesapeake Bay watershed through identification of headwater and other low-order streams or drainage features (e.g. ditches) that, to date, may be absent from existing hydrography data products. A full description of the methodology and accuracy assessment is provided in the accompanying report titled: "Hydrography Mapping Supporting Modeling and Targeted Conservation: Project Overview and Lessons Learned". The data products were developed by the Chesapeake Conservancy and the University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) as part of a 6-year Cooperative Agreement between the Chesapeake Conservancy and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and a separate Interagency Agreement between the USGS and the EPA to provide geospatial support to the Chesapeake Bay Program Office. The data release is structured by eight-digit level hydrologic unit codes (HUC8) for the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Each HUC8 contains seven files (see below) and uses the following nomenclature: where HUC_ID and WATERSHED_NAME are placeholders for HUC8 ID(s), and local watershed name(s) (e.g., "Hydrographic Datasets for Hydrologic Unit 02050101 - Upper Susquehanna") Data Release Structure: Project Overview and Lessons Learned.pdf (Project overivew, methodology and accuracy assessment) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamLine.zip (Stream Lines) huc_[HUC_ID]_streamPoly.zip (Stream Polygons) huc_[HUC_ID]_agDitches.zip (Agricultural Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_rdDitches.zip (Road Ditches) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon1m.tif (Geomorphon 1-meter) huc_[HUC_ID]_geomorphon10m.tif (Geomorphon 10-meter) metadata_[HUC_ID].xml (metadata xml)
Data for the Potomac River Watershed Accumulated Wastewater Viewer
공공데이터포털
This data release contains measured streamflow data from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgages and reported wastewater data from wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) within the Potomac River watershed between October 1, 2021 and September 30, 2024. Mean monthly streamflow data was obtained from 117 USGS streamgages (Table1_Streamgages.csv). Average monthly reported wastewater discharge volumes to surface water were obtained from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits using the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) Environment and Compliance History Online (ECHO) database to obtain DMRs from the Integrated Compliance Information System National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (ICIS-NPDES). Quality assurance procedures that were used to avoid inclusion of inaccurate data that can be reported on DMRs (Table2_WWTP_DMRs.csv) are documented within the Process Step fields of the metadata. At each streamgage the average monthly accumulated wastewater percentage (ACCWW) was calculated by dividing the total amount of reported wastewater upstream of the streamgage by the measured amount of streamflow (Table3_Streamgage_ACCWW.csv) following similar methods described in Miller and others (2024) and Barber and others (2025). The ACCWW calculations were computed monthly at each streamgage using reported total wastewater discharge, municipal wastewater discharge, and municipal-plus-industrial per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) wastewater discharge which includes municipal wastewater in addition to wastewater from industrial WWTPs that are potential PFAS handling industry sectors defined by the USEPA (2023). The term ‘municipal’ is used here to represent NPDES-permitted facilities with the Standard Industrial Classification code 4952 (‘sewerage systems’) and 'industrial' refers to permitted facilities with Standard Industrial Classification codes other than 4952. Monthly predicted environmental concentrations and constituent loads (i.e. mass fluxes) of eight PFAS and 14 pesticides were estimated at each streamgage following methodology presented by Barber and others (2025) and Miller and others (2024). Monthly PFAS loads were computed by multiplying the discharge volumes from municipal and industrial WWTPs that are potential PFAS handling industry sectors by the median PFAS concentrations measured and reported in Barber and others (2025). Monthly pesticide loads were computed by multiplying the discharge volumes from municipal WWTPs by the median pesticide concentrations reported in Miller and others (2024). Wastewater effluent concentrations from Miller and others (2024) and Barber and others (2025) are provided in Table4_Parameters.csv. Monthly predicted constituent loads from wastewater were summed from WWTPs that discharged to every National Hydrography Dataset Version 2.1 (NHDPlus V2; USEPA, 2012) stream segment Common Identifier (COMID) upstream of each streamgage, not including the COMID where the streamgage was located, to calculate the predicted monthly load at each streamgage (Table5_Streamgage_Parameter_Predictions.csv). Predicted monthly concentrations from wastewater were calculated by dividing the predicted monthly load by measured monthly streamflow at each streamgage (Table5_Streamgage_Parameter_Predictions.csv).
Trends in 7-day-low streamflows at 174 USGS streamflow gages in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, Mid-Atlantic U.S.
공공데이터포털
This data set contains U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) streamgage identification numbers, begin and end years of the periods of streamflow record tested, Sen slope trends in the annual minimum 7-day streamflow for the period of record tested, the p-values (significance) of the trends, and the trend Sen slopes standardized by the standard deviations of the residual errors defined as the difference between observations and the Sen slope lines, for 174 USGS streamgages with 56 to 75 years of record in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, Mid-Atlantic U.S.