데이터셋 상세
미국
Python-HBRT model and groundwater levels used for estimating the static, shallow water table depth for the State of Wisconsin
A histrogram-based boosted regression tree (HBRT) method was used to predict the depth to the surficial aquifer water table (in feet) throughout the State of Wisconsin. This method used a combination of discrete groundwater levels from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System, continuous groundwater levels from the National Groundwater Monitoring Network, the State of Wisconsin well-construction database, and NHDPlus version 2.1-derived points. The predicted water table depth utilized the HBRT model available through Scikit-learn in Python version 3.10.10. The HBRT model can predict the surficial water table depth for any latitude and longitude for Wisconsin. A total of 48 predictor variables were used for model development, including basic well characteristics, soil properties, aquifer properties, hydrologic position on the landscape, recharge and evapotranspiration rates, and bedrock characteristics. Model results indicate that the mean surficial water table depth across Wisconsin is 28.3 feet below land surface, with a root mean square error of 7.40 feet for the holdout data to the HBRT model. Aside from the overall HBRT methods contained as part of the Python script, this data release includes a self-contained model directory for recreating the HBRT model published in this data release. The model directory also includes a model object for the HBRT model used to predict the surficial aquifer water table depth (in feet) for the State of Wisconsin. Three separate directories are available within this data release that define the input predictor variables, water levels, and NHD points for the HBRT model. The 'bedrock-overlay' sub-directory contains geospatial data that define the special selection zones used in the depth-to-water well selection (DTW_well_selection_zones.docx). The 'water-levels' sub-directory contains input files for the NHDPlus version 2.1 points, the State of Wisconsin well construction spreadsheets, and water level summary files. The 'python-attributes' sub-directory contains predictor variable rasters and vector data that predict the surficial water table depth for Wisconsin and a Jupyter Notebook used for the attribution and input files for well and NHD points.
데이터 정보
연관 데이터
Water-level models used to estimate observation-well drawdown during the 16 multiple-well aquifer tests conducted in Pahute Mesa, Nevada National Security Site, 2009–14
공공데이터포털
This USGS data release represents tabular data and water-level modeling files for the 16 Pahute Mesa multiple-well aquifer tests conducted from 2009–2014. This dataset represents water-level models used to estimate observation-well drawdown during the 16 multiple-well aquifer tests. Water-level models are organized by aquifer test in zipped files. Water-level models are created using an Excel Add-in called SeriesSEE (Halford and others, 2012). The SeriesSEE Excel Add-in also is inlcuded so that water-level models can be reactivated. Once the SeriesSEE Add-In is loaded into Excel, water-level model files can be activated by opening the file, scrolling to the SeriesSEE toolbar menu, and selecting the "WLM" utility. See Halford and others (2012) for more information about SeriesSEE. Reference Cited: Halford, K.J., Garcia, C.A., Fenlon, J.M., and Mirus, B.B., 2012, Advanced methods for modeling water-levels and estimating drawdowns with SeriesSEE, an Excel add-in: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Report, 4-F4. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
Water-level models used to estimate observation-well drawdown during the 16 multiple-well aquifer tests conducted in Pahute Mesa, Nevada National Security Site, 2009–14
공공데이터포털
This USGS data release represents tabular data and water-level modeling files for the 16 Pahute Mesa multiple-well aquifer tests conducted from 2009–2014. This dataset represents water-level models used to estimate observation-well drawdown during the 16 multiple-well aquifer tests. Water-level models are organized by aquifer test in zipped files. Water-level models are created using an Excel Add-in called SeriesSEE (Halford and others, 2012). The SeriesSEE Excel Add-in also is inlcuded so that water-level models can be reactivated. Once the SeriesSEE Add-In is loaded into Excel, water-level model files can be activated by opening the file, scrolling to the SeriesSEE toolbar menu, and selecting the "WLM" utility. See Halford and others (2012) for more information about SeriesSEE. Reference Cited: Halford, K.J., Garcia, C.A., Fenlon, J.M., and Mirus, B.B., 2012, Advanced methods for modeling water-levels and estimating drawdowns with SeriesSEE, an Excel add-in: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Report, 4-F4. Reston, Virginia: USGS.
On the Deterministic and Stochastic Use of Hydrologic Models: Data Release
공공데이터포털
This data set archives all inputs, outputs and scripts needed to reproduce the findings of W.H. Farmer and R.M. Vogel in the 2016 Water Resources Research article entitled "On the Deterministic and Stochastic Use of Hydrologic Model". Input data includes observed streamflow values, in cubic feet per second, for 1225 streamgages over the period from 01 October 1980 through 30 September 2011. Estiamted streamflows, for the same streamgages and periods, is provided from a general calibration of the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System. Output data includes the same with alternate realizations of streamflow generated following the descriptions in the associated report. These results can be regenerated by using the included scripts. Data are provided in several files: (1) observedStreamflow.csv contains observed streamflows, in cubic feet per second, for all 1225 streamgages; (2) prmsModeledStreamflow.csv contains streamflows modeled with the Precipitation Runoff Modeling Streamflow (Markstrom et al., 2015; DOI 10.3133/tm6B7); (3) outputData.zip contains CSV files of observed, PRMS-modeled and stochastically-generated streamflows, in cubic feet per second, for all 1225 streamgages; (4) README.txt describes the contents of this archive and execution of model scripts; (5) simulation.R is a computer script in in the R programming lanaguage and is capable of reproducing the results in outputData.zip from observedStreamflow.csv and prmsModeledStreamflow.csv; (6) analysis.R is another R script capable of reproducing the figures in the associated report from the results in outputData.zip.
On the Deterministic and Stochastic Use of Hydrologic Models: Data Release
공공데이터포털
This data set archives all inputs, outputs and scripts needed to reproduce the findings of W.H. Farmer and R.M. Vogel in the 2016 Water Resources Research article entitled "On the Deterministic and Stochastic Use of Hydrologic Model". Input data includes observed streamflow values, in cubic feet per second, for 1225 streamgages over the period from 01 October 1980 through 30 September 2011. Estiamted streamflows, for the same streamgages and periods, is provided from a general calibration of the Precipitation Runoff Modeling System. Output data includes the same with alternate realizations of streamflow generated following the descriptions in the associated report. These results can be regenerated by using the included scripts. Data are provided in several files: (1) observedStreamflow.csv contains observed streamflows, in cubic feet per second, for all 1225 streamgages; (2) prmsModeledStreamflow.csv contains streamflows modeled with the Precipitation Runoff Modeling Streamflow (Markstrom et al., 2015; DOI 10.3133/tm6B7); (3) outputData.zip contains CSV files of observed, PRMS-modeled and stochastically-generated streamflows, in cubic feet per second, for all 1225 streamgages; (4) README.txt describes the contents of this archive and execution of model scripts; (5) simulation.R is a computer script in in the R programming lanaguage and is capable of reproducing the results in outputData.zip from observedStreamflow.csv and prmsModeledStreamflow.csv; (6) analysis.R is another R script capable of reproducing the figures in the associated report from the results in outputData.zip.
PNW Hydrologic Landscape Class
공공데이터포털
Work has been done to expand the hydrologic landscapes (HLs) concept and to develop an approach for using it to address streamflow vulnerability from climate change. This work has included development of the HL classification framework and its application to Oregon, use of the HL classes to predict where a simple lumped hydrologic model accurately predicts daily streamflow, use of HL information to model the presence of cold-water patches at tributary confluences, and combining Oregon HL results with temperature and precipitation predictions to examine how HLs would vary as a result of climate change. As a part of the current work, the HL approach has been expanded to the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, and Idaho) based on a revision of the approach that makes it more broadly applicable. This revised approach has several advantages compared with the original approach: it is not limited to areas that have an aquifer permeability map; it uses a flexible approach to converting a nationally available geospatial dataset into assessment units; and it is more robust. These improvements should allow the revised HL approach to be applied more often in situations requiring hydrologic classification, and allow greater confidence in results. This effort paves the way for a climate change analysis for the Pacific Northwest that is currently underway, as well as expansion into the southwest (California, Arizona, and Nevada). This dataset contains a high resolution version of the PNW HL maps along with shape files. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Leibowitz , S., R. Comeleo , P.J. Wigington, Jr., M. Weber , E.A. Sproles, and K.A. Sawicz. Hydrologic Landscape Characterization for the Pacific Northwest, USA. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION. American Water Resources Association, Middleburg, VA, USA, 52(2): 473-493, (2016).
Delaware River Basin depth to bedrock observations, model predictions, and explanatory variables
공공데이터포털
This data release contains model inputs, R code, and model outputs for predicting depth to bedrock in the Delaware River Basin at a 1km gridded resolution with a random forest model. Model inputs are provided in a comma-separated value (csv) file. The training data used in this study of 72,773 point observations of depth to bedrock (DTB) within the Delaware River Basin (DRB) that was compiled from several sources. These data were attributed with 15 predictor variables representing topographic, soil, geologic, and physiographic characteristics of the depth to bedrock observation. One predictor variable is a grouped surficial geology category that was adapted from the State Geologic Map Compilation (Horton and others, 2017); the grouped lithology categories are provided in this data release as a shapefile dataset. The predictions from the random forest model are provided as a gridded geoTIFF file. Two files are provided - one for uncorrected model predictions and another for predictions that were bias-corrected using the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Matching (ECDM) approach of Belitz and Stackelberg (2021). The bias-corrected predictions are the final model predictions for use in other applications. Horton, J.D., San Juan, C.A., Stoeser, D.B., 2017. The State Geologic Map Compilation (SGMC) geodatabase of the conterminous United States (Report No. 1052), Data Series. Reston, VA. https://doi.org/10.3133/ds1052 Belitz, K., Stackelberg, P.E., 2021. Evaluation of six methods for correcting bias in estimates from ensemble tree machine learning regression models. Environmental Modelling & Software 139, 105006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105006