This data release includes mercury concentrations and mercury stable isotope measurements measured in sediments and biological tissues collected from the Saint Louis River located in Minnesota. Sediments and biota were collected by the U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and federal contractors (Battelle) from 2017-2021. Collection regions included nearshore zones within the main estuary, remedial sites within the lower river, and upstream reservoir sites. Sediments were analyzed for total mercury, methylmercury, and mercury stable isotopes by the U.S. Geological Survey Mercury Research Laboratory (MRL, Madison, Wisconsin). Biological samples were analyzed for total and methylmercury by the MRL or the Contaminant Ecology Research Laboratory (CERL, Corvallis, Oregon); mercury stable isotopes were analyzed by the MRL.

Samples were collected from Clear Lake, California from 2019-2022 by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) California Water Science Center, the USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC), the US Environmental Protection Agency, and EA Engineering Science and Technology Inc. to assess the extent and cycling of legacy mercury (Hg) contamination from Sulphur Bank Mine. Samples of waste rock, sediments, groundwater, and biological tissue (zooplankton, bluegill, smallmouth bass, Mississippi silversides, and largemouth bass) were analyzed for Hg stable isotopes by the U.S. Geological Survey Mercury Research Laboratory. Mercury concentrations for sediments, waste rocks, and groundwaters are included within this data release and information for biological Hg concentrations can be found in the companion data release (https://doi.org/10.5066/P96912PN).

Samples were collected from Clear Lake, California from 2019-2022 by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) California Water Science Center, the USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC), the US Environmental Protection Agency, and EA Engineering Science and Technology Inc. to assess the extent and cycling of legacy mercury (Hg) contamination from Sulphur Bank Mine. Samples of waste rock, sediments, groundwater, and biological tissue (zooplankton, bluegill, smallmouth bass, Mississippi silversides, and largemouth bass) were analyzed for Hg stable isotopes by the U.S. Geological Survey Mercury Research Laboratory. Mercury concentrations for sediments, waste rocks, and groundwaters are included within this data release and information for biological Hg concentrations can be found in the companion data release (https://doi.org/10.5066/P96912PN).

Mercury concentration, mercury stable isotope ratio, and carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratio data as applicable for sediment, water, invertebrates, and fish collected from the St. Louis River Area of Concern (MN-WI) and the associated reference site, the lower Bad River (WI). This dataset is associated with the following publication: Janssen, S., J. Hoffman, R. Lepak, D. Krabbenhoft, D. Walters, C. Eagles-Smith, G. Peterson, J. Ogorek, J. DeWild, A. Cotter, M. Pearson, M. Tate, R. Yeardley, and M. Mills. Examining historical mercury sources in the St. Louis River estuary: How legacy contamination influences biological mercury levels in Great Lakes coastal regions. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT. Elsevier BV, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 779: 146284, (2021).

In 2021, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Mercury Research Laboratory (MRL) conducted a large-scale assessment of mercury (Hg) concentrations and Hg stable isotope values in tributaries of Lake Superior in order to define the sources and amounts of Hg entering the lake. Water samples were collected monthly from 18 tributaries in the United States from April through October in 2021 and during 2022 spring melt (May 2022). As a complement, 10 tributaries on the Lake Superior Northshore were sampled three times a year (spring, summer, and fall) by Lakehead University and Lakehead Region Conservation Authority. Nine tributaries were also sampled twice per year (spring and summer) in Pukaskwa National Park by Parks Canada. Filtered total Hg (THg) concentrations from United States and Canadian Northshore ranged from 0.2 to 8.8 nanograms per liter (ng L-1), with a median value of 1.2 ng L-1. Unfiltered THg in Pukaskwa National Park ranged from 0.6 to 5.0 ng L-1 with a median of 3.2 ng L-1, but encompassed both the filtered and particulate bound Hg. Median methylmercury (MeHg) values were approximately 0.1 ng L-1 for both filtered and unfiltered waters, but could reach levels greater than 1 ng L-1 during higher flow events. THg and MeHg concentrations were positively correlated to dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations for most tributaries. Hg loads to Lake Superior were calculated for U.S. tributaries using the R package loadflex ( http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00517.1 ), median loads for THg were 18 grams per day, but could increase to 590 grams per day under high flow and snow melt conditions.

This dataset describes mercury (Hg) stable isotope values in fish dorsal muscle from different freshwater environments across the globe. Fish were collected at numerous field sites in North America, South and Central America, Africa, and Asia from 2006-2020. Sub-samples were provided by cooperators to the U.S. Geological Survey Mercury Research Laboratory and the University of Wisconsin for mercury stable isotope analysis. Samples were analyzed for mercury stable isotopes from 2017-2021. These specimens represent multiple trophic levels and body sizes from different food webs and when adequate mass was available, multiple species from the same food web were examined. Cooperators include, but are not limited to: Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute, University of Dar es Salaam, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique of Gabon, Direction de la Faune et des Aires Protegees and la Delegation a la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique of Republic of Congo, Central African Forest Ecosystems Programme (now NaturAfrica) -Congo, Kingdom of Thailand’s Department of Fisheries, ASMA Guatemala, Southern African Scientific Service Centre for Climate Change and Adaptive Land Management, Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources.

This dataset describes mercury (Hg) and methylmercury (MeHg) concentration data and Hg and MeHg stable isotope values in plankton, waters, and sediments that were collected from two inland freshwater lakes in Madison, Wisconsin. Plankton and waters were collected monthly from May-October in 2021 and 2022 from Lake Mendota and Lake Monona and sediments were sampled in 2017. Samples were processed and analyzed at the U.S. Geological Survey Mercury Research Laboratory in collaboration with the University of Wisconsin for mercury species concentration and stable isotope analysis.

Under the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, the U.S. Geological Survey Mercury Research Lab (USGS MRL) conducted a multiyear assessment of mercury across the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biannual sampling was conducted across all five lakes onboard the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) research vessel Lake Guardian (in years 2010–2014, 2018) at pelagic sampling locations established by the long-term US EPA Great Lakes monitoring program. In addition to the regularly scheduled biannual sampling, in September 2013 and 2014 Lake Michigan and Lake Erie (respectively) were sampled with increased focus on shallow nearshore locations. Throughout these sampling efforts, sediments, mussels, surface water, and plankton were collected from open-water locations within all five of the Great Lakes. Additionally, surface water from Great Lake tributaries were sampled by the USGS MRL and preceded (2005 or 2006) or overlapped (2010-2015) with the open lake sampling efforts. All surface water samples were analyzed for methylmercury, total mercury, and dissolved organic carbon. Plankton and mussel tissue were analyzed for methylmercury, total mercury, and carbon/nitrogen stable isotopes and concentrations (plankton only). Sediments were analyzed for methylmercury, total mercury, and carbon content.

Under the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, the U.S. Geological Survey Mercury Research Lab (USGS MRL) conducted a multiyear assessment of mercury across the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biannual sampling was conducted across all five lakes onboard the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) research vessel Lake Guardian (in years 2010–2014, 2018) at pelagic sampling locations established by the long-term US EPA Great Lakes monitoring program. In addition to the regularly scheduled biannual sampling, in September 2013 and 2014 Lake Michigan and Lake Erie (respectively) were sampled with increased focus on shallow nearshore locations. Throughout these sampling efforts, sediments, mussels, surface water, and plankton were collected from open-water locations within all five of the Great Lakes. Additionally, surface water from Great Lake tributaries were sampled by the USGS MRL and preceded (2005 or 2006) or overlapped (2010-2015) with the open lake sampling efforts. All surface water samples were analyzed for methylmercury, total mercury, and dissolved organic carbon. Plankton and mussel tissue were analyzed for methylmercury, total mercury, and carbon/nitrogen stable isotopes and concentrations (plankton only). Sediments were analyzed for methylmercury, total mercury, and carbon content.

Laboratory experiments were performed between 2019 and 2020 to examine how dissolved organic matter (DOM) and phytoplankton (Raphidocelis subcapitata) cells alter mercury (Hg) uptake and isotope fractionation. Experiments were performed at ambient Hg to thiol ratios using natural organic matter isolates received from collaborators at the University of California-Davis. Two types of experiments were performed: (1) one set with SRFA isolates at two concentrations and Hg, termed uptake experiment, and (2) one set with DOM isolates, Hg, and cultured Raphidocelis subcapitata cells, termed sunlight exposure experiment. For additional experimental details, including culturing conditions, experimental set-up, and analysis, refer to the companion publication (Armstrong and others, 2023, TBD).