데이터셋 상세
미국
Electromagnetic Induction and Ground-Penetrating Radar Surveys at Transportation Infrastructure Sites in New Hampshire, 2022
In 2022, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) New England Water Science Center, in cooperation with the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT), surveyed four transportation infrastructure sites with frequency-domain electromagnetic induction (EMI) instruments and one site with ground-penetrating radar (GPR) to aid traditional geotechnical site characterizations performed by NHDOT. Information about subsurface physical properties is typically obtained through the use of borings during geotechnical site characterizations. Geotechnical site investigations that also include geophysical surveys (such as the EMI and GPR methods) between borings help provide more thorough characterizations. Integrated analysis of geophysical and boring data for transportation projects aids in the production of a more spatially comprehensive representation of geotechnical subsurface conditions than can be determined using conventional borings alone. Two frequency-domain EMI instruments that measure electrical conductivity changes with depth in different ways were used: ·The GEM-2 (serial number 405, Geophex, Ltd.), with fixed transmitter-receiver (Tx-Rx) coil spacing, transmits waves at several logarithmically spaced frequencies (1530Hz, 3930Hz, 8250Hz, 13590Hz, 20370Hz, and 47970Hz). Lower frequencies are generally capable of imaging deeper, and higher frequencies provide increased resolution of the subsurface. · The DUALEM-421 (serial number 335, DualEM, Inc.) uses a single frequency at 9-kHz with various Tx-Rx coil spacings and orientations, where larger coil spacings image deeper and shorter coil spacings provide increased resolution of the subsurface. Ground penetrating radar profiles used an antenna with a fixed Tx-Rx offset contained within a tow-body. GPR transmits pulses of electromagnetic energy into the subsurface and records the amplitude and timing for the return of reflected signals (Keary and Brooks, 1991). The GPR data were collected using a MALA GX controller (ID:227603071) running software version 15.2.269.39 and GroundExplorer 80-MHz shielded antenna (ID:1513002). This data release contains raw and processed EMI and GPR data and measurement locations. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The data provided in this data release are: (1) raw GPR profile data in the *.RD3 and *.RD7 formats, (2) raw DUALEM-421 data in comma separated values (*.CSV) files, (3) raw GEM-2 data in Geophex Binary Format (*.GBF), and *.CSV file formats (Geophex software application, EMExport (Version 4.5.2) was used to export the raw binary *.GBF format to *.CSV), (4) processed DUALEM and GEM-2 files with ‘_dat’ in the filename, and (5) inverted DUALEM and GEM-2 profiles with ‘_inv’ in the filename. Readme files are available to explain the data contained within the data files References: Kearey, P., and Brooks, M., 1991, An introduction to geophysical exploration second edition: Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge, Mass., 254p.
데이터 정보
연관 데이터
Processed ground-based EM survey data
공공데이터포털
Shallow soil characteristics were mapped near Shellmound, Mississippi, using the DualEM 421 electromagnetic sensor in October 2018. Data were acquired by towing the DualEM sensor on a wheeled cart behind an ATV, with the sensor at a height of 0.432 meters (m) above the ground surface. Approximately 175 line-kilometers of data were acquired over an area of nearly four square kilometers, with 25 m separation between survey lines. Data were manually edited for noise sources such as powerlines or other buried structures, and averaged to regular output soundings every 5 m along survey lines. This data release contains the processed data that have been averaged and culled to produce final resistivity models. Digital data of the processed soundings are provided and fields are defined in the data dictionary.
Ground-based electromagnetic survey, Shellmound, Mississippi, October 2018
공공데이터포털
Shallow soil characteristics were mapped near Shellmound, Mississippi, using the DualEM 421 electromagnetic sensor in October 2018. Data were acquired by towing the DualEM sensor on a wheeled cart behind an all-terrain vehicle (ATV), with the sensor at a height of 0.432 meters (m) above the ground surface. Approximately 175 line-kilometers of data were acquired over an area of nearly four square-kilometers, with 25 m separation between survey lines. Data were manually edited for noise sources such as powerlines or other buried structures and averaged to regular output soundings every 5 m along survey lines. The processed data were inverted to recover models of electrical resistivity structure as a function of depth at each sounding location using a spatially constrained inversion. This data release contains the raw and processed data, as well as inverted resistivity models. Model results show typical depth of investigation from about 4 – 6 m, with spatial variability in mapped electrical resistivity characteristic of fluvial deposition of sediments in channels and scroll bar features adjacent to the Tallahatchie River and nearby abandoned meander channels.
Ground-based electromagnetic survey, Shellmound, Mississippi, October 2018
공공데이터포털
Shallow soil characteristics were mapped near Shellmound, Mississippi, using the DualEM 421 electromagnetic sensor in October 2018. Data were acquired by towing the DualEM sensor on a wheeled cart behind an all-terrain vehicle (ATV), with the sensor at a height of 0.432 meters (m) above the ground surface. Approximately 175 line-kilometers of data were acquired over an area of nearly four square-kilometers, with 25 m separation between survey lines. Data were manually edited for noise sources such as powerlines or other buried structures and averaged to regular output soundings every 5 m along survey lines. The processed data were inverted to recover models of electrical resistivity structure as a function of depth at each sounding location using a spatially constrained inversion. This data release contains the raw and processed data, as well as inverted resistivity models. Model results show typical depth of investigation from about 4 – 6 m, with spatial variability in mapped electrical resistivity characteristic of fluvial deposition of sediments in channels and scroll bar features adjacent to the Tallahatchie River and nearby abandoned meander channels.
Unprocessed ground-based EM survey data
공공데이터포털
Shallow soil characteristics were mapped near Shellmound, Mississippi, using the DualEM 421 electromagnetic sensor in October 2018. Data were acquired by towing the DualEM sensor on a wheeled cart behind an ATV, with the sensor at a height of 0.432 meters (m) above the ground surface. Approximately 175 line-kilometers of data were acquired over an area of nearly four square kilometers, with 25 m separation between survey lines. Raw data are provided here.
Water-borne electromagnetic induction data collected at Hen Cove, Pocasset, Massachusetts, 2022
공공데이터포털
The bulk electrical conductivity of the subsurface was indirectly measured with electromagnetic imaging (EMI) by using induced secondary electromagnetic signals generated by subsurface electrical conductors in response to transmitted electromagnetic energy (Zohdy and others, 1974). Electromagnetic induction data were collected using a DUALEM-421 (DualEM, Inc.) mounted on an inflatable stand-up paddle board about 15 centimeters above the water surface. The DUALEM-421 uses 3 transmitter-receiver coil spacings (4-, 2-, and 1-meters) and 2 orientations (vertical dipole, and horizontal dipole). Larger coil spacings interrogate a larger/deeper sampling volume than smaller coil separations. REFERENCE: U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 2, Chapter D1, Zhody, A. A. R., Eaton , G. P., and Mabey, D. R. https://doi.org/10.3133/twri02D1
Water-borne electromagnetic induction data collected at Hen Cove, Pocasset, Massachusetts, 2022
공공데이터포털
The bulk electrical conductivity of the subsurface was indirectly measured with electromagnetic imaging (EMI) by using induced secondary electromagnetic signals generated by subsurface electrical conductors in response to transmitted electromagnetic energy (Zohdy and others, 1974). Electromagnetic induction data were collected using a DUALEM-421 (DualEM, Inc.) mounted on an inflatable stand-up paddle board about 15 centimeters above the water surface. The DUALEM-421 uses 3 transmitter-receiver coil spacings (4-, 2-, and 1-meters) and 2 orientations (vertical dipole, and horizontal dipole). Larger coil spacings interrogate a larger/deeper sampling volume than smaller coil separations. REFERENCE: U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 2, Chapter D1, Zhody, A. A. R., Eaton , G. P., and Mabey, D. R. https://doi.org/10.3133/twri02D1
Airborne electromagnetic, magnetic, and radiometric survey, Shellmound, Mississippi, March 2018 (ver. 2.0, March 2024)
공공데이터포털
Airborne electromagnetic (AEM), magnetic, and radiometric data were acquired in late February to early March 2018 along 2,364 line-kilometers in the Shellmound, Mississippi study area. Data were acquired by CGG Canada Services, Ltd. with three different helicopter-borne sensors: the CGG Canada Services, Ltd. RESOLVE frequency-domain AEM instrument that is used to map subsurface geologic structure at depths up to 100 meters, depending on the subsurface resistivity; a Scintrex CS-3 cesium vapor magnetometer that detects changes in deep (hundreds of meters to kilometers) geologic structure based on variations in the magnetic properties of different formations; and a Radiation Solutions RS-500 spectrometer that detects the abundance of natural radioelements potassium, uranium, and thorium in the upper 20-30 cm that is used to determine differences in soil constituents. The survey was flown at a nominal sensor flight height of 30 m above terrain to form block-style coverage with 250 to 1,000-meter spaced east-west flight lines. This data release includes minimally processed (raw) AEM data as supplied by CGG Canada Services, Ltd. (https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5ca6ce7ee4b0c3b0064c2ce5), the fully processed (averaged and culled) sounding data (https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5d0814b9e4b0e3d3115bdab6), and laterally constrained inverted resistivity depth sections along all flight lines (https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5ca6a4e6e4b0c3b0064c2c2b), as well as unprocessed and processed (diurnally corrected and draped to terrain) magnetic data (https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5ca6ce7ee4b0c3b0064c2ce5), and unprocessed and processed (following International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Report procedures) radiometric data (https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5ca6ce7ee4b0c3b0064c2ce5). Data acquisition and minimal processing were conducted by CGG Canada Services, Ltd. and described in detail in the contractor's report. Digital data from production flights are provided, and data fields are defined in the data dictionary. A total field magnetic anomaly grid and a ternary radiometric image are provided as well (https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/5cd0ad9de4b09b8c0b79a53f). An important driver for this survey is a managed aquifer recharge pilot project developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service investigating the use of bank filtration along the Tallahatchie River as a source for recharge in areas of significant groundwater decline by direct injection into the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer (MRVA). Understanding the structure of the aquifer, including both shallow and deep confining units, is important for the success of this pilot engineering study and will be even more important for potential future large-scale engineering projects and groundwater model development efforts. REFERENCES International Atomic Energy Agency, 1991, Airborne Gamma Ray Spectrometer Surveying, Technical Reports Series No. 323, IAEA, Vienna. U.S. Geological Survey, The National Map, 2017, 3DEP products and services: The National Map, 3D Elevation Program Web page, accessed October 2018 at https://nationalmap.gov/3DEP/3dep_prodserv.html.
Geophysical Data Collected for an Assessment of a Proposed Landfill Site in Fredericktown, Missouri, June 2018
공공데이터포털
In June 2018, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) collected geophysical measurements to help evaluate the suitability of a proposed landfill site for disposing mine-waste materials in Fredericktown, Missouri. Geophysical methods were used to evaluate and characterize the unconsolidated sediment (i.e., regolith) above the crystalline bedrock as well as determine depth bedrock. Land-based geophysical methods included frequency domain electromagnetic induction (FDEM), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio passive seismic (HVSR), and shear-wave seismic refraction. Water-borne methods included FDEM surveys to characterize the Fredericktown City Lake sediments as well as forward-looking infrared (FLIR) imagery taken along the City Lake shoreline to identify locations of potential groundwater-surface water interactions.
Geophysical Data Collected for an Assessment of a Proposed Landfill Site in Fredericktown, Missouri, June 2018
공공데이터포털
In June 2018, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) collected geophysical measurements to help evaluate the suitability of a proposed landfill site for disposing mine-waste materials in Fredericktown, Missouri. Geophysical methods were used to evaluate and characterize the unconsolidated sediment (i.e., regolith) above the crystalline bedrock as well as determine depth bedrock. Land-based geophysical methods included frequency domain electromagnetic induction (FDEM), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio passive seismic (HVSR), and shear-wave seismic refraction. Water-borne methods included FDEM surveys to characterize the Fredericktown City Lake sediments as well as forward-looking infrared (FLIR) imagery taken along the City Lake shoreline to identify locations of potential groundwater-surface water interactions.
Airborne electromagnetic (AEM) surveys from the Tallahatchie River near Shellmound, Mississippi
공공데이터포털
Airborne frequency domain electromagnetic (AEM) data were acquired in a grid pattern consisting of many west-east oriented survey lines over the Tallahatchie River during November 2018. Data were collected by members of the U.S. Geological Survey, Crustal Geophysics and Geochemistry Science Center Group, and CGG. AEM data acquired in Leflore County, Mississippi, were collected to characterize the subsurface resistivity structure in support of a U.S. Geological Survey groundwater investigation of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain. Airborne EM data were acquired with the Resolve (CGG Airborne) frequency-domain instrument over the same reach 18 line-kilometers that follow the Tallahatchie River in Leflore County in Mississippi as part of a mapping campaign in the Mississippi alluvial plain region. The AEM data comprise five horizontal coplanar transmitter-receiver (Tx-Rx) coil pairs separated by about 7.9 meters (m) at frequencies between 383 and 133,528 Hertz (Hz), and one vertical coaxial coil pair separated by about 9 m that operates at 3,315 Hz. Nominal system height above ground, or river, surface was 30 m and was recorded along flight paths. Data along the survey line that were used to produce the final resistivity models are provided here. Digital data of the processed soundings are provided, and fields are defined in a data dictionary. (1) File: MAPRegAEM2018_EM_Mag_Rad_rawData_L8072002.csv is comma-delimited ASCII file that contain the least processed data. Data locations are provided as UTM Zone 15 N projection and datum of WGS-84. (2) File: MAPRegAEM2018_ProcessedData_L8072002.csv is comma- delimited ASCII file containing the processed data . Data locations are provided as UTM Zone 15 N projection and datum of WGS-84. (3) File: MAPRegAEM2018_ResistivityModels_L8072002.csv is comma-delimited ASCII files containing the inversion model results. Model locations are provided as UTM Zone 15 N projection and datum of WGS-84. (4) File: 20181115_ShellmoundMS_AEM_LINE120_INVERTED_image.png and 20181115_ShellmoundMS_AEM_LINE120_INVERTED_image.pdf are the inverted model output as a 2D profile of electrical resistivity distribution in the subsurface.