데이터셋 상세
미국
Evaluating Uncertainty of Microwave Calibration Models from Regression Residuals
The data used to generate the graphs in figures 1-9 of the paper "Evaluating Uncertainty of Microwave Calibrations from Regression Residuals".The full citation is D. F. Williams, B. F. Jamroz, J. D. Rezac and R. D. Jones, "Evaluating Uncertainty of Microwave Calibration Models With Regression Residuals," in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 2454-2467, June 2020, doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2020.2983358.The files are named as follows: 1. CI_figX.plt - Contains EasyPlot V 4.0.4 file used to create the plot, columns used in each file, legend, etc. 2. FigX_FY_name - Contains TAB-delimited data file Y used to construct figure X with original file name "name". First two lines repeats key information found in EasyPlot file. First line specifies columns used in EasyPlot column-selection format. Second line contains original location.EasyPlot column-selection format is as follows: "xyiiyy" or "xy..yy" means that column 1 was used for x axis, column 2 for first curve y values, column 5 for second curve y values, column 6 for third curve y values
데이터 정보
연관 데이터
Data release for Assessing the Uncertainties in Climatic Estimates Based on Vegetation Assemblages: Examples from Modern Vegetation Assemblages in the American Southwest
공공데이터포털
This data release includes climatic variables and associated descriptive material created for the purpose of assessing uncertainties associated with climatic estimates based on vegetation assemblages (Thompson and others, 2021). The data are from the interior of the western United States, including all of Arizona, and portions of California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, and Utah. The data are observed, interpolated, and estimated values for the mean temperature of the coldest month (MTCO, degrees C), mean temperature of the warmest month (MTWA, degrees C), and mean annual total precipitation (MAP, mm).
EPA June 2012 12km Continental US (CONUS) Bidirectional CMAQ v5.0.2 Simulations
공공데이터포털
This work is the first of a two‐part study that aims to develop a computationally efficient bias correction framework to improve surface PM2.5 forecasts in the United States. Here, an ensemble‐based Kalman filter (KF) technique is developed primarily for nonrural areas with approximately 500 surface observation sites for PM2.5 and applied to three (GEOS‐Chem, WRF‐Chem, and WRF‐CMAQ) chemical transport model (CTM) hindcast outputs for June 2012. While all CTMs underestimate daily surface PM2.5 mass concentration by 20–50%, KF correction is effective for improving each CTM forecast. Subsequently, two ensemble methods are formulated: (1) the arithmetic mean ensemble (AME) that equally weights each model and (2) the optimized ensemble (OPE) that calculates the individual model weights by minimizing the least‐square errors. While the OPE shows superior performance than the AME, the combination of either the AME or the OPE with a KF performs better than the OPE alone, indicating the effectiveness of the KF technique. Overall, the combination of a KF with the OPE shows the best results. Lastly, the Successive Correction Method (SCM) was applied to spread the bias correction from model grids with surface PM2.5 observations to the grids lacking ground observations by using a radius of influence of 125 km derived from surface observations, which further improves the forecast of surface PM2.5 at the national scale. Our findings provide the foundation for the second part of this study that uses satellite‐based aerosol optical depth (AOD) products to further improve the forecast of surface PM2.5 in rural areas by performing statistical analysis of model output. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Spero, T., B. Murphy, H. Huanxin Zhang1,2, Jun Wang1,2, Lorena Castro García1,2, Cui Ge, J. Wang, L. Castro García, C. Ge, and T. Plessel. Improving surface PM2.5 forecasts in the U.S. using an ensemble of chemical transport model outputs, part I: bias correction with surface observations in non-rural areas. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, USA, 125(14): e2019JD032293, (2020).