Additional details used in the methods are found in the MS Word file “S1_Dawson et al._Supporting_Information.docx”. The MS Excel file “S2_Dawson et al. Supporting Information.xlsx” contains datasets and graphical results. The Excel file sheets are as follows: S2.1 illustrates Clint hepatic flow calculations, S2.2 - 5 include training and test data sets; S2.6-7 include figures illustrating Clint model selection criteria and assemblages of model descriptors; S2.8 includes confusion matrices for evaluation Clint model, S2.9-10 include figures illustrating fup model selection criteria and assemblages of model descriptors (with ranges); S2.11 includes tables of model assessments of the Clint test set, S2.12 includes information relevant to BER calculations for the ToxCast test set, S2.13 includes information relevant to BER calculations for Tox21 chemicals, and S2.14 provides information on different transformations for fup. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Dawson, D., B. Ingle, K. Phillips, J. Nichols, J. Wambaugh, and R. Tornero-Velez. Designing QSARs for Parameters of High-Throughput Toxicokinetic Models Using Open-Source Descriptors. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 55(9): 6505, (6517).

Additional details used in the methods are found in the MS Word file “S1_Dawson et al._Supporting_Information.docx”. The MS Excel file “S2_Dawson et al. Supporting Information.xlsx” contains datasets and graphical results. The Excel file sheets are as follows: S2.1 illustrates Clint hepatic flow calculations, S2.2 - 5 include training and test data sets; S2.6-7 include figures illustrating Clint model selection criteria and assemblages of model descriptors; S2.8 includes confusion matrices for evaluation Clint model, S2.9-10 include figures illustrating fup model selection criteria and assemblages of model descriptors (with ranges); S2.11 includes tables of model assessments of the Clint test set, S2.12 includes information relevant to BER calculations for the ToxCast test set, S2.13 includes information relevant to BER calculations for Tox21 chemicals, and S2.14 provides information on different transformations for fup. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Dawson, D., B. Ingle, K. Phillips, J. Nichols, J. Wambaugh, and R. Tornero-Velez. Designing QSARs for Parameters of High-Throughput Toxicokinetic Models Using Open-Source Descriptors. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 55(9): 6505, (6517).

The dataset has all of the information used to create and evaluate 3 independent QSAR models for the fraction of a chemical unbound by plasma protein (Fub) for environmentally relevant chemicals. In vitro plasma protein values for 1245 pharmaceuticals and 406 ToxCast chemicals were collected from the literature (Obach 2008, Zhu 2013, Wetmore 2012, Wetmore 2015). The 21 descriptors calculated by MOE that were used in the models are included, as is an acid/base/neutral/zwitterions classification based on ionization percentages calculated in ADMET Predictor. Finally, the dataset includes the in silico Fub predictions for each chemical from the constructed k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and random forest QSAR models, as well as a consensus (average) prediction. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Ingle, B., R. Tornero-Velez, J. Nichols, and B. Veber. Informing the Human Plasma Protein Binding of Environmental Chemicals by Machine Learning in the Pharmaceutical Space: Applicability Domain and Limits of Predictability. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 56(11): 2243-2252, (2016).

The dataset has all of the information used to create and evaluate 3 independent QSAR models for the fraction of a chemical unbound by plasma protein (Fub) for environmentally relevant chemicals. In vitro plasma protein values for 1245 pharmaceuticals and 406 ToxCast chemicals were collected from the literature (Obach 2008, Zhu 2013, Wetmore 2012, Wetmore 2015). The 21 descriptors calculated by MOE that were used in the models are included, as is an acid/base/neutral/zwitterions classification based on ionization percentages calculated in ADMET Predictor. Finally, the dataset includes the in silico Fub predictions for each chemical from the constructed k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and random forest QSAR models, as well as a consensus (average) prediction. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Ingle, B., R. Tornero-Velez, J. Nichols, and B. Veber. Informing the Human Plasma Protein Binding of Environmental Chemicals by Machine Learning in the Pharmaceutical Space: Applicability Domain and Limits of Predictability. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 56(11): 2243-2252, (2016).

This paper describes a model to take chemical structures and predict a property (the point of departure) for a new chemical. No new data were generated. The contents of this zip file contains metadata that you could use to make a model prediction. It does contain all of the code and a help file describing how to run the model. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Pradeep, P., K. Paul-Friedman, and R. Judson. Structure-based QSAR Models to Predict Repeat Dose Toxicity Points of Departure. Computational Toxicology. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS, 16(November 2020): 100139, (2020).

In this study, a major effort was undertaken to compile a large genotoxicity dataset (54,805 records for 9299 substances) from several public sources (e.g., TOXNET, COSMOS, eChemPortal). The names and outcomes of the different assays were harmonized, and assays were annotated by type: gene mutation in Salmonella bacteria (Ames assay) and chromosome mutation (clastogenicity) in vitro or in vivo (chromosome aberration, micronucleus, and mouse lymphoma Tk+/- assays). This dataset was then evaluated to assess genotoxic potential using a categorization scheme, whereby a substance was considered genotoxic if it was positive in at least one Ames or clastogen study. The categorization dataset comprised 8442 chemicals, of which 2728 chemicals were genotoxic, 5585 were not and 129 were inconclusive. QSAR models (TEST and VEGA) and the OECD Toolbox structural alerts/profilers (e.g., OASIS DNA alerts for Ames and chromosomal aberrations) were used to make in silico predictions of genotoxicity potential. The performance of the individual QSAR tools and structural alerts resulted in balanced accuracies of 57-73%. A Naïve Bayes consensus model was developed using combinations of QSAR models and structural alert predictions. The ‘best’ consensus model selected had a balanced accuracy of 81.2%, a sensitivity of 87.24% and a specificity of 75.20%. This in silico scheme offers promise as a first step in ranking thousands of substances as part of a prioritization approach for genotoxicity. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Pradeep, P., R. Judson, D. DeMarini, N. Keshava, T. Martin, J. Dean, C. Gibbons, A. Simha, S. Warren, M. Gwinn, and G. Patlewicz. An Evaluation of Existing QSAR Models and Structural Alerts and Development of New Ensemble Models for Genotoxicity Using a Newly Compiled Experimental Dataset. Computational Toxicology. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS, 18: 100167, (2021).

The data used in this analysis was obtained from published literature and available through the high-throughput toxicokinetic (HTTK) R package. The dataset consists of 1486 chemicals that span a variety of use classes including pharmaceuticals, food-use chemicals, pesticides and industrial chemicals of which 1139 chemicals had experimental human in vitro fraction unbound data and 642 chemicals that had experimental human in vitro intrinsic clearance data. Structures were curated and obtained from the DSSTox database. The distribution of experimental values for fraction unbound and intrinsic clearance is shown in Supplementary Figure S1. Since the data were non-normally distributed they were appropriately transformed before any analysis was conducted. The details of the transformation and the transformed data distribution are presented in the results section and Supplementary Figures S2 and S3. A complete list of chemicals with CAS registry numbers (CASRN), DSSTox generic substance IDs (DTXSIDs), structure and experimental data for both parameters are included as supplemental data (1.ChemicalListData.csv and 1.ChemicalList-QSARready.sdf). This dataset is associated with the following publication: Pradeep, P., G. Patlewicz, R. Pearce, J. Wambaugh, B. Wetmore, and R. Judson. Using Chemical Structure Information to Develop Predictive Models for In Vitro Toxicokinetic Parameters to Inform High-throughput Risk-assessment. Computational Toxicology. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS, 16: 100136, (2020).

This data includes metabolite predictions for in vitro inactive chemicals, predictions of those metabolite's estrogen receptor binding activity, in vitro and in silico information regarding parent compound binding activities, linking of metabolite structures and routes to parent compounds, and estimates of binding activity obtained from literature when possible. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Leonard, J., C. Stevens, K. Mansouri, D. Chang, H. Pudukodu, S. Smith, and C. Tan. A Workflow for Identifying Metabolically Active Chemicals to Complement in vitro Toxicity Screening. Computational Toxicology. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS, 6: 71-83, (2018).

This data includes metabolite predictions for in vitro inactive chemicals, predictions of those metabolite's estrogen receptor binding activity, in vitro and in silico information regarding parent compound binding activities, linking of metabolite structures and routes to parent compounds, and estimates of binding activity obtained from literature when possible. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Leonard, J., C. Stevens, K. Mansouri, D. Chang, H. Pudukodu, S. Smith, and C. Tan. A Workflow for Identifying Metabolically Active Chemicals to Complement in vitro Toxicity Screening. Computational Toxicology. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS, 6: 71-83, (2018).

This data set contains ToxPrint finger prints for all chemicals in FUse that had QSAR-ready SMILES strings as well as select physicochemical properties from the Estimation Program Interface Suite (EPI Suite) program. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Phillips, K., J. Wambaugh, C. Grulke, K. Dionisio, and K. Isaacs. High-throughput screening of chemicals as functional substitutes using structure-based classification models. GREEN CHEMISTRY. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 19: 1063-1074, (2017).