A key input for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is geologic slip rate data. Here, we compile all geologic slip rates that are reportedly used in U.S. National Seismic Hazard Map (NSHM) releases from 1996, 2002, 2007, 2008, and 2014. Although a new NSHM was released in 2018, no changes were made in geologic slip rate data used. The geologic slip rates are collated from existing NSHM reports and documentation, and no new data are reported herein. The geologic slip rates are coupled with the most up-to-date fault geometries utilized for NSHM calculations, and the data are presented spatially as a shapefile (SHP), in keyhole markup language (KML) and geoJSON. A readme file accompanies this dataset explaining details of the data compilation. This data release corrects minor typographical errors in the initial compilation of geologic slip rates used in U.S. National Seismic Hazard Models (1996-2014). The original compilation (version 1, published August 2020) is now superseded by this edited compilation (version 2, published February 2022). To compare changes between release, a 'Version Changes' file is included in this Data Release.

A key input for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is geologic slip rate data. Yet, no single database exists to house all geologic slip rate data used in these calculations. Here, we compile all geologic slip rates that are reportedly used in U.S. National Seismic Hazard Map (NSHM) releases from 1996, 2002, 2007, 2008, and 2014. Although a new NSHM was released in 2018, no changes were made in geologic slip rate data used. The geologic slip rates are collated from existing NSHM reports and documentation, and no new data are reported herein. The geologic slip rates are coupled with the most up-to-date fault geometries utilized for NSHM calculations, and the data are presented spatially as a shapefile (SHP) and in keyhole markup language (KML). A readme file accompanies this dataset explaining details of the data compilation.

A key input for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is geologic slip rate data. Here, we compile all geologic slip rates that are reportedly used in U.S. National Seismic Hazard Map (NSHM) releases from 1996, 2002, 2007, 2008, and 2014. Although a new NSHM was released in 2018, no changes were made in geologic slip rate data used. The geologic slip rates are collated from existing NSHM reports and documentation, and no new data are reported herein. The geologic slip rates are coupled with the most up-to-date fault geometries utilized for NSHM calculations, and the data are presented spatially as a shapefile (SHP), in keyhole markup language (KML) and geoJSON. A readme file accompanies this dataset explaining details of the data compilation. This data release corrects minor typographical errors in the initial compilation of geologic slip rates used in U.S. National Seismic Hazard Models (1996-2014). The original compilation (version 1, published August 2020) is now superseded by this edited compilation (version 2, published February 2022). To compare changes between release, a 'Version Changes' file is included in this Data Release.

A key input for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is geologic slip rate data. Here, we compile all geologic slip rates that are reportedly used in U.S. National Seismic Hazard Map (NSHM) releases from 1996, 2002, 2007, 2008, and 2014. Although a new NSHM was released in 2018, no changes were made in geologic slip rate data used. The geologic slip rates are collated from existing NSHM reports and documentation, and no new data are reported herein. The geologic slip rates are coupled with the most up-to-date fault geometries utilized for NSHM calculations, and the data are presented spatially as a shapefile (SHP), in keyhole markup language (KML) and geoJSON. A readme file accompanies this dataset explaining details of the data compilation. This data release corrects minor typographical errors in the initial compilation of geologic slip rates used in U.S. National Seismic Hazard Models (1996-2014). The original compilation (version 1, published August 2020) is now superseded by this edited compilation (version 2, published February 2022). To compare changes between release, a 'Version Changes' file is included in this Data Release.

,Data show fault-based seismic sources used in the time-independent component of the Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3), which provides authoritative estimates of the magnitude, location, and time-averaged frequency of potentially damaging earthquakes in California. Fault model slip rates are given in millimeters per year. The feature service depicts the surface traces of modeled faults, which are simplified from the CGS – USGS Quaternary Fault and Fold database (https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults/). For modeled blind fault seismic sources, the traces represent the map-view fault tip projection of the subsurface fault. For additional information regarding modeled faults in UCERF3 please refer to Appendix A of the UCERF3 report (https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1165/).,For additional information about UCERF3 please see https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/rghm/psha/Pages/sr_228.aspx for the full UCERF3 publication and supporting products.,

Data from the geodetic network across Hawaii were used to model slip rates for décollement faults along the southern and western flanks of the Island of Hawai`i. Data for the observed and predicted GPS velocities at each station, the inverted slip rates along the décollements, as well as the coordinates defining the outline of the décollements are included here.

Data from the geodetic network across Hawaii were used to model slip rates for décollement faults along the southern and western flanks of the Island of Hawai`i. Data for the observed and predicted GPS velocities at each station, the inverted slip rates along the décollements, as well as the coordinates defining the outline of the décollements are included here.

This Data Release contains version 3.0 of two related earthquake geology databases for use in the 2023 U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model. The databases are: 1) A fault sections database (“NSHM23_FSD_v3”), which depicts the geometry of faults capable of hosting independent earthquakes, and 2) an earthquake geology site information database (“NSHM23_EQGeoDB_v3”), which contains fault slip rate constraints at points. These databases cover the 12 western U.S. states: Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico and Texas. Datasets containing crustal fault information for Alaska and the central and eastern United States were prepared by Bender and others, 2021 and Thompson Jobe and others, 2023 in separate efforts. The two databases are broken into separate child items from this landing page. The databases are provided as geospatial data (.SHP, .KML, and GeoJSON file formats) and tables (.CSV format). Reference information, including change log, version notes, and a README, are included as "Attached Files" below this Summary. Versioning These databases are updated as of December 2023 (version 3.0), which supersede the databases release in February 2022 (version 2.0) and the January 2021 (version 1.0) preliminary datasets. After significant testing by many user groups, this version 3.0 data release contains minor changes. The specific changes made in the fault sections database (FSD) from version 2.0 (2022) to version 3.0 (2023; this release) are outlined in "NSHM23_FSD_v2-v3_VersionChanges.txt." The changes to the EQGeoDB involve fixing typos and further populating the reference list to include UCERF3 references; the authors acknowledge Scott Marshall (Appalachian State University) for uncovering these additional references. Note on the Cheraw fault: At the time of original compilation (2020-2021), the Cheraw fault of Colorado was included in the western U.S. fault sections database. During model implementation, the Cheraw fault was instead treated as a central and eastern U.S. fault. To maintain consistency with earlier releases, we retain the Cheraw fault geometry and attributes in this table. For more information, please review Shumway and others., in press manuscript about CEUS fault implementation. For more information on how these datasets were compiled, please refer to our manuscript publication, Hatem and others, 2022. References Cited Bender, A.M., Haeussler, P.J. and Powers, P.M., 2021, Geologic inputs for the 2023 Alaska update to the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) (ver. 2.0, February 2023): U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P97NRR0F Hatem, A.E., Collett, C.M., Briggs, R.W., Gold, R.D., Angster, S.J., Field, E.H., Powers, P.M. and the Earthquake Geology Working Group, 2022, Simplifying complex fault data for systems-level analysis: Earthquake geology inputs for US NSHM 2023. Scientific data, 9(1), 506. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01609-7 Shumway, A.M., Petersen, M.D., Powers, P.M., Toro, G., Altekruse, J. M., Herrick, J.A., Rukstales, K.S., Thompson Jobe, J.A., Hatem, A.E., and Girot, D.L., in press, Earthquake Rupture Forecast Model Construction for the 2023 U.S. 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model Update: Central and Eastern U.S. Fault-Based Source Model. Seismological Research Letters. Thompson Jobe, J.A., Hatem, A.E., Gold, R.D., DuRoss, C., Reitman, N.G., Briggs, R.W., and Collett, C.M., 2022, Earthquake geology inputs for the National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) 2023 (central and eastern United States), version 1.0: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P94HLE5G

This Data Release contains version 3.0 of two related earthquake geology databases for use in the 2023 U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model. The databases are: 1) A fault sections database (“NSHM23_FSD_v3”), which depicts the geometry of faults capable of hosting independent earthquakes, and 2) an earthquake geology site information database (“NSHM23_EQGeoDB_v3”), which contains fault slip rate constraints at points. These databases cover the 12 western U.S. states: Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico and Texas. Datasets containing crustal fault information for Alaska and the central and eastern United States were prepared by Bender and others, 2021 and Thompson Jobe and others, 2023 in separate efforts. The two databases are broken into separate child items from this landing page. The databases are provided as geospatial data (.SHP, .KML, and GeoJSON file formats) and tables (.CSV format). Reference information, including change log, version notes, and a README, are included as "Attached Files" below this Summary. Versioning These databases are updated as of December 2023 (version 3.0), which supersede the databases release in February 2022 (version 2.0) and the January 2021 (version 1.0) preliminary datasets. After significant testing by many user groups, this version 3.0 data release contains minor changes. The specific changes made in the fault sections database (FSD) from version 2.0 (2022) to version 3.0 (2023; this release) are outlined in "NSHM23_FSD_v2-v3_VersionChanges.txt." The changes to the EQGeoDB involve fixing typos and further populating the reference list to include UCERF3 references; the authors acknowledge Scott Marshall (Appalachian State University) for uncovering these additional references. Note on the Cheraw fault: At the time of original compilation (2020-2021), the Cheraw fault of Colorado was included in the western U.S. fault sections database. During model implementation, the Cheraw fault was instead treated as a central and eastern U.S. fault. To maintain consistency with earlier releases, we retain the Cheraw fault geometry and attributes in this table. For more information, please review Shumway and others., in press manuscript about CEUS fault implementation. For more information on how these datasets were compiled, please refer to our manuscript publication, Hatem and others, 2022. References Cited Bender, A.M., Haeussler, P.J. and Powers, P.M., 2021, Geologic inputs for the 2023 Alaska update to the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) (ver. 2.0, February 2023): U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P97NRR0F Hatem, A.E., Collett, C.M., Briggs, R.W., Gold, R.D., Angster, S.J., Field, E.H., Powers, P.M. and the Earthquake Geology Working Group, 2022, Simplifying complex fault data for systems-level analysis: Earthquake geology inputs for US NSHM 2023. Scientific data, 9(1), 506. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01609-7 Shumway, A.M., Petersen, M.D., Powers, P.M., Toro, G., Altekruse, J. M., Herrick, J.A., Rukstales, K.S., Thompson Jobe, J.A., Hatem, A.E., and Girot, D.L., in press, Earthquake Rupture Forecast Model Construction for the 2023 U.S. 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model Update: Central and Eastern U.S. Fault-Based Source Model. Seismological Research Letters. Thompson Jobe, J.A., Hatem, A.E., Gold, R.D., DuRoss, C., Reitman, N.G., Briggs, R.W., and Collett, C.M., 2022, Earthquake geology inputs for the National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) 2023 (central and eastern United States), version 1.0: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P94HLE5G

This data release includes geodetic time series from high-rate GPS instruments recording 4 earthquakes co-seismically in the near-field – the 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake; the 2012 Nicoya, Costa Rica earthquake; the 2014 Iquique, Chile earthquake; and the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake. For each earthquake, data (sac files, 1 Hz sampling, ~2-3 minutes around the earthquake origin time) are included in a separate folder. Each sac file provides a time series of ground displacement from the earthquake as recorded at that station. The location of each station is listed in the relevant earthquake file in the “_station_info” folder.