Dataset shows popular recreational fishing spots in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. Fishing areas were derived from the publication "Anglers' Guide to the United States Atlantic Coast, Fish, Fishing Grounds & Fishing Facilities"and from personal communication with Keith Lockwood, MDNR, Fisheries Service in 2000.

This shapefile contains points that represent fish species field survey data collected between 08/13/2002 and 06/01/2005 in seven Mid-Atlantic and Northeast Coastal and Barrier Network Parks within Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania: Eisenhower National Historic Site (EISE), Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania National Military Park (FRSP), Gettysburg National Military Park (GETT), George Washington Birthplace National Monument (GEWA), Hopewell Furnace National Historic Site (HOFU), Richmond National Battlefield Park (RICH), and Thomas Stone National Historic Park (THST).

Maryland, through its Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program, is collecting information on how the public uses the Chesapeake Bay waters and adjacent lands. These baseline data will inform planning efforts being undertaken by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to help inform public access, land acquisition, and future oyster aquaculture planning and decision-making. Collecting data on the variety of ways our Chesapeake waters are used will help us plan for reducing use conflicts in our coastal waters, maximizing efficiency, and enhancing environmental and economic productivity. Chesapeake Bay waters are used in many ways: commercial fishing, aquaculture, transport, habitat for wildlife, and recreation, among others. With new and expanding coastal and marine uses, as well as Maryland’s growing coastal population, the pressure is mounting to ensure that there is space for both traditional and new uses and that conflicts are minimized. Some mapped human use data exist, but Maryland has limited recreational water use data for the Chesapeake waters. Basic data on how we use our coastal waters was collected by inviting residents and experts to share their knowledge about recreational uses at workshops using geographical information systems technology.

This shapefile contains lines that represent field survey transects where data were collected between 08/13/2002 and 06/01/2005 for a fish inventory in Mid-Atlantic and Northeast Coastal and Barrier Network Parks within Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania.

The Southeast Coast Network is comprised of 20 parks within the states of North and South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, all of which are responsible for a large percentage of the fish diversity in the United States. Collectively, these parks would be expected to harbor a high diversity of fishes due to the wide range of habitats represented. At the time of the present study (2001-2005), many basic species inventories for fishes were lacking for many of the parks in the network. The purpose of the study was to sample fishes in 12 parks to supplement existing data or to provide preliminary records of fishes where no records existed. From these data an expected list of fishes for all parks was generated. In 2023, the data was then processed for dissemination by the Inventory and Monitoring Division (IMD), complying with Executive Order 13642, Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information (GPO 2013). Processed tabular datasets have been created using the data provided from the parks, following Darwin Core naming standards and introducing data quality flagging where data was missing or unclear.

The Southeast Coast Network is comprised of 20 parks within the states of North and South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, all of which are responsible for a large percentage of the fish diversity in the United States. Collectively, these parks would be expected to harbor a high diversity of fishes due to the wide range of habitats represented. At the time of the present study (2001-2005), many basic species inventories for fishes were lacking for many of the parks in the network. The purpose of the study was to sample fishes in 12 parks to supplement existing data or to provide preliminary records of fishes where no records existed. From these data an expected list of fishes for all parks was generated. In 2023, the data was then processed for dissemination by the Inventory and Monitoring Division (IMD), complying with Executive Order 13642, Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information (GPO 2013). Processed tabular datasets have been created using the data provided from the parks, following Darwin Core naming standards and introducing data quality flagging where data was missing or unclear.

The Southeast Coast Network is comprised of 20 parks within the states of North and South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, all of which are responsible for a large percentage of the fish diversity in the United States. Collectively, these parks would be expected to harbor a high diversity of fishes due to the wide range of habitats represented. At the time of the present study (2001-2005), many basic species inventories for fishes were lacking for many of the parks in the network. The purpose of the study was to sample fishes in 12 parks to supplement existing data or to provide preliminary records of fishes where no records existed. From these data an expected list of fishes for all parks was generated. In 2023, the data was then processed for dissemination by the Inventory and Monitoring Division (IMD), complying with Executive Order 13642, Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information (GPO 2013). Processed tabular datasets have been created using the data provided from the parks, following Darwin Core naming standards and introducing data quality flagging where data was missing or unclear.

The Southeast Coast Network is comprised of 20 parks within the states of North and South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, all of which are responsible for a large percentage of the fish diversity in the United States. Collectively, these parks would be expected to harbor a high diversity of fishes due to the wide range of habitats represented. At the time of the present study (2001-2005), many basic species inventories for fishes were lacking for many of the parks in the network. The purpose of the study was to sample fishes in 12 parks to supplement existing data or to provide preliminary records of fishes where no records existed. From these data an expected list of fishes for all parks was generated. In 2023, the data was then processed for dissemination by the Inventory and Monitoring Division (IMD), complying with Executive Order 13642, Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information (GPO 2013). Processed tabular datasets have been created using the data provided from the parks, following Darwin Core naming standards and introducing data quality flagging where data was missing or unclear.

• 데이터 소개 - 야놀자센터에서 가공된 지역별 낚시 상품 데이터 - 지역명, 낚시상품명, 낚시 상품 주소 등으로 구성된 데이터