데이터셋 상세
미국
KCSO Reporting Areas
King County Sheriff's Department Reporting Areas
데이터 정보
연관 데이터
County Police Stations
공공데이터포털
This dataset contains Maryland counties police facilities. County Police and County Sheriff's offices are included.
King County Sheriff's Office - Use of Force Analysis (dashboard link)
공공데이터포털
Link to a dashboard showing an analysis of KCSO use of force incidents occurring in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. Additional metadata available on link page.
경찰청 전라남도경찰청 경찰서별 지역관서 현황
공공데이터포털
전라남도 경찰청 소속 경찰서별 지역경찰관서(지구대, 파출소, 치안센터) 수 입니다.육지와 도서를 구분한 자료 입니다.
Prosecuting Attorney Data Dashboard
공공데이터포털
The King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office (KCPAO) created this dashboard in 2020 to help better inform the public, government decision makers, and criminal justice system partners about the trajectory of felony criminal justice cases in King County. The KCPAO handles the vast majority of felonies in King County and some misdemeanors. Misdemeanor crimes are low-level offenses punishable by up to 364 days in jail. Felony crimes are more serious offenses and may result in a prison sentence of more than one year. This dashboard only provides data on felony referrals and cases filed into King County Superior Court; it does not contain any data on cases in King County District Court or the various Municipal Courts. The data that populates this dashboard comes from the KCPAO and, where noted, the King County Department of Judicial Administration about cases filed or intended to be filed in King County Superior Court.
Evaluation of Community Policing Initiatives in Jefferson County, West Virginia, 1996-1997
공공데이터포털
This data collection was designed to evaluate the implementation of community policing initiatives for three police departments in Jefferson County, West Virginia: the Ranson Town Police Department, the West Virginia State Police (Jefferson County Detachment), and the Jefferson County Sheriff's Department. The evaluation was undertaken by the Free Our Citizens of Unhealthy Substances Coalition (FOCUS), a county-based group of citizens who represented all segments of the community, including businesses, churches, local law enforcement agencies, and local governments. The aim was to find answers to the following questions: (1) Can community policing have any detectable and measurable impact in a predominantly rural setting? (2) Did the police department do what they said they would do in their funding application? (3) If they were successful, what factors supported their efforts and were key to their success? and (4) If they were not successful, what problems prevented their success? The coalition conducted citizen surveys to evaluate how much of an impact community policing initiatives had in their county. In January 1996, research assistants conducted a baseline survey of 300 households in the county. Survey responses were intended to gauge residents' fear of crime and to assess how well the police were performing their duties. After one year, the coalition repeated its survey of public attitudes, and research assistants interviewed another 300 households. The research assumption was that any change in fear of crime or assessment of police performance could reasonably be attributed to these new community policing inventions. Crime reporting variables from the survey included which crime most concerned the respondent, if the respondent would report a crime he or she observed, and whether the respondent would testify about the crime in court. Variables pertaining to level of concern for specific crimes include how concerned respondents were that someone would rob or attack them, break into or vandalize their home, or try to sexually attack them/someone they cared about. Community involvement variables covered participation in community groups or activities, neighborhood associations, church, or informal social activities. Police/citizen interaction variables focused on the number of times respondents had called to report a problem to the police in the last two years, how satisfied they were with how the police handled the problem, the extent to which this police department needed improvement, whether children trusted law enforcement officers, whether police needed to respond more quickly to calls, whether the police needed improved relations with the community, and in the past year whether local police performance had improved/gotten worse. Specific crime information variables include whether the crime occurred in the respondent's neighborhood, whether he/she was the victim, if crime was serious in the respondent's neighborhood versus elsewhere, whether the respondent had considered moving as a result of crime in the neighborhood, and how personal safety had changed in the respondent's neighborhood. Variables relating to community policing include whether the respondent had heard the term "community policing" in the past year, from what source, and what community policing activities the respondent was aware of. Demographic variables include job self-classification, racial/ethnic identity, length of residency, age, gender, martial status, educational status, and respondent's town of residence.
Louisville KY Metro Police Districts
공공데이터포털
These district include Louisville Metro Police Districts (LMPD) and police districts for several suburban cities within Jefferson County. View detailed metadata.
Waze LCSO Traffic Incidents
공공데이터포털
Traffic incidents worked by the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office, the Middleburg Police Department, and the Purcellville Police Department.