This portion of the USGS data release contains simulated nearshore wave parameters derived from a stand-alone spectral wave model of the Columbia River littoral cell, Washington and Oregon. The model output includes significant wave heights, peak wave periods, mean wave directions, and water depths for a series of 221 shore normal transects that extended from the coastline to the -15 m NAVD88 elevation (about 16.5 m average water depth). Data are provided at the seaward extent of each transect as well as at the location of the break point, or location just outside the surf zone, which varied dynamically based on the local bathymetry and wave conditions. Additional data are provided at four locations corresponding to the locations of buoy observations used to validate the model application. The data are derived from two hindcasts solved at hourly intervals between 1) August 2014 to September 2023 (h1), and 2) July 2010 to August 2011 (h2). The data from both hindcasts were compiled into netCDF files for the nearshore and buoy locations for distribution.

A stand-alone wave model application was constructed using the spectral wave model SWAN within the Delft3D4 (version 4.04.01) modeling system to simulate nearshore wave dynamics along the coast of the Columbia River littoral cell, Washington and Oregon. Nearshore wave dynamics are solved at hourly intervals on a series of nested grids with resolutions varying between 750 m for the largest grid to about 80 m for the two detailed grids that cover the Grays Harbor and Columbia River inlets. The provided model input files are compressed into zip archives for each year of a hindcast simulation between August 2014 and September 2023. Additional input files are included that specify a second hindcast for the time period between July 2010 and August 2011.

A stand-alone wave model application was constructed using the spectral wave model SWAN within the Delft3D4 (version 4.04.01) modeling system to simulate nearshore wave dynamics along the coast of the Columbia River littoral cell, Washington and Oregon. Nearshore wave dynamics are solved at hourly intervals on a series of nested grids with resolutions varying between 750 m for the largest grid to about 80 m for the two detailed grids that cover the Grays Harbor and Columbia River inlets. The provided model input files are compressed into zip archives for each year of a hindcast simulation between August 2014 and September 2023. Additional input files are included that specify a second hindcast for the time period between July 2010 and August 2011.

A one- and two-dimensional hydrodynamic model of the San Francisco Bay and Delta was constructed using the Delft3D Flexible Mesh Suite (Delft3D FM; Kernkamp and others, 2011; https://www.deltares.nl/en/software/delft3d-flexible-mesh-suite/) to simulate still water levels. Required model input files are provided to run the model for the time period from October 1, 2018, to April 30, 2019. This data release describes the construction and validation of the model application and provides input files suitable to run the model on Delft3D FM Suite 2020.04. Model Description: The San Francisco Bay and Delta Still Water Level Model (SFBD-SWL) utilizes the open-source Delft3D Flexible Mesh Suite (Delft3D FM; Kernkamp and others, 2011; https://www.deltares.nl/en/software/delft3d-flexible-mesh-suite/, 2020.04 release, SVN revision 601351) to compute Still Water Levels (SWLs) in San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. SWL captures the effects of meteorological and fluvial forcing on the coastal water levels; however, it excludes the impacts of wave setup and runup on the water level. The model covers the Delta up to the approximate upstream limit of tidal influence and extends seaward to the Pacific Ocean. It must be noted that the main purpose of the model was to simulate SWL in open embayments of the San Francisco Bay. The model utilizes 1D elements used to represent tributaries and rivers flowing into the Bay and Delta. Model schematizations of the Delta (model grid and cross-section profiles) were derived from Delta Simulation Model II (DSM2, California Department of Water Resources, 2013). Topographic and bathymetric datasets from the USGS and California Department of Water Resources were applied across the San Francisco Bay and Delta Hydrodynamic model. In particular, the 2-meter resolution LEAN-corrected topography in the Bay (Buffington and others, 2016) and the seamless 10-meter resolution digital elevation model by Fregoso and others (2017) were applied. Data from the National Land Cover Database Land Cover (CONUS; Homer and others, 2020) were converted to roughness. The unstructured grid consists of more than 185,000 net nodes in the horizontal with a spatial resolution as fine as 100 meters. The 100-meter resolution model network is not fine enough to resolve smaller features such as narrow levees and dams. Therefore, an additional polyline has been included to account for constraining and rerouting effects of local levees and infrastructure. This file provides the location of each subgrid feature and, in combination with the latest topography, describes fine-scale elevations for the hydrodynamic simulations. The model is forced by astronomic tides and remote non-tidal residual (NTR) water levels at the offshore boundaries, fluvial discharges, and wind and atmospheric mean sea level pressure fields at the surface. Offshore Boundaries The model's offshore boundary conditions in the Pacific Ocean are based on 67 measured tidal constituents at San Francisco with spatial variability derived from TPXO 8.0 (Egbert and Erofeeva, 2002). Tidal constituents were calibrated based on the difference between modeled and observed tidal constituents at the NOAA tide stations located throughout the bay. Remote NTR derived from measurements at the San Francisco NOAA tide station (#9414290) are applied uniformly across the ocean boundary. The tidal forcing files are included in the model package, as well as the NTR offshore boundary forcing files for the time period from Oct-2018 to Apr-2019. Discharge Boundaries Fluvial discharges from 16 USGS gauged rivers that flow into the Bay are included in the model (https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dv/?referred_module=sw). Six fluvial inflows to the Delta are based on Dayflow model outputs (https://data.ca.gov/dataset/dayflow). The discharge forcing files for the time period from Oct-2018 to Apr-2019 are included in the model package. The discharge stations incorporated in the SFBD-SWL are

A one- and two-dimensional hydrodynamic model of the San Francisco Bay and Delta was constructed using the Delft3D Flexible Mesh Suite (Delft3D FM; Kernkamp and others, 2011; https://www.deltares.nl/en/software/delft3d-flexible-mesh-suite/) to simulate still water levels. Required model input files are provided to run the model for the time period from October 1, 2018, to April 30, 2019. This data release describes the construction and validation of the model application and provides input files suitable to run the model on Delft3D FM Suite 2020.04. Model Description: The San Francisco Bay and Delta Still Water Level Model (SFBD-SWL) utilizes the open-source Delft3D Flexible Mesh Suite (Delft3D FM; Kernkamp and others, 2011; https://www.deltares.nl/en/software/delft3d-flexible-mesh-suite/, 2020.04 release, SVN revision 601351) to compute Still Water Levels (SWLs) in San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. SWL captures the effects of meteorological and fluvial forcing on the coastal water levels; however, it excludes the impacts of wave setup and runup on the water level. The model covers the Delta up to the approximate upstream limit of tidal influence and extends seaward to the Pacific Ocean. It must be noted that the main purpose of the model was to simulate SWL in open embayments of the San Francisco Bay. The model utilizes 1D elements used to represent tributaries and rivers flowing into the Bay and Delta. Model schematizations of the Delta (model grid and cross-section profiles) were derived from Delta Simulation Model II (DSM2, California Department of Water Resources, 2013). Topographic and bathymetric datasets from the USGS and California Department of Water Resources were applied across the San Francisco Bay and Delta Hydrodynamic model. In particular, the 2-meter resolution LEAN-corrected topography in the Bay (Buffington and others, 2016) and the seamless 10-meter resolution digital elevation model by Fregoso and others (2017) were applied. Data from the National Land Cover Database Land Cover (CONUS; Homer and others, 2020) were converted to roughness. The unstructured grid consists of more than 185,000 net nodes in the horizontal with a spatial resolution as fine as 100 meters. The 100-meter resolution model network is not fine enough to resolve smaller features such as narrow levees and dams. Therefore, an additional polyline has been included to account for constraining and rerouting effects of local levees and infrastructure. This file provides the location of each subgrid feature and, in combination with the latest topography, describes fine-scale elevations for the hydrodynamic simulations. The model is forced by astronomic tides and remote non-tidal residual (NTR) water levels at the offshore boundaries, fluvial discharges, and wind and atmospheric mean sea level pressure fields at the surface. Offshore Boundaries The model's offshore boundary conditions in the Pacific Ocean are based on 67 measured tidal constituents at San Francisco with spatial variability derived from TPXO 8.0 (Egbert and Erofeeva, 2002). Tidal constituents were calibrated based on the difference between modeled and observed tidal constituents at the NOAA tide stations located throughout the bay. Remote NTR derived from measurements at the San Francisco NOAA tide station (#9414290) are applied uniformly across the ocean boundary. The tidal forcing files are included in the model package, as well as the NTR offshore boundary forcing files for the time period from Oct-2018 to Apr-2019. Discharge Boundaries Fluvial discharges from 16 USGS gauged rivers that flow into the Bay are included in the model (https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dv/?referred_module=sw). Six fluvial inflows to the Delta are based on Dayflow model outputs (https://data.ca.gov/dataset/dayflow). The discharge forcing files for the time period from Oct-2018 to Apr-2019 are included in the model package. The discharge stations incorporated in the SFBD-SWL are

Provided here are the required input files to run a standalone wave model (Simulating Waves Nearshore [SWAN]; Booij and others, 1999) on eleven model domains from the Canada-U.S. border to Norton Sound, Alaska. The model runs create a downscaled wave database (DWDB) which, can be used to reconstruct hindcast, historical, or projected time series at each point in the model domains (see Engelstad and others, 2023 for further information on reconstruction of time-series). The model forcing files consist of reduced sets of binned wind and wave parameter combinations, hereafter termed ‘sea states’. The use of representative sea states allows for lower computational costs and follows modified methods outlined in for example Camus and others, 2011, Reguero and others, 2013, and Lucero and others, 2017. Wind and wave parameters were extracted from the ERA5 reanalysis (Hersbach and others, 2020; https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/) for the hindcast period (1979–2019) and for the historical (1979-2014) and projected (2020-2050) time periods from WAVEWATCHIII wave model runs (Erikson and others, 2022) driven by winds and sea ice fields from the 6th generation Coupled Model Inter-comparison Projects (CMIP6 Haarsma and others, 2016 The extent of each model domain can be inferred from the browse graphic. Model input files are described in the Entity and Attribute Overview section.

Provided here are the required input files to run a standalone wave model (Simulating Waves Nearshore [SWAN]; Booij and others, 1999) on eleven model domains from the Canada-U.S. border to Norton Sound, Alaska. The model runs create a downscaled wave database (DWDB) which, can be used to reconstruct hindcast, historical, or projected time series at each point in the model domains (see Engelstad and others, 2023 for further information on reconstruction of time-series). The model forcing files consist of reduced sets of binned wind and wave parameter combinations, hereafter termed ‘sea states’. The use of representative sea states allows for lower computational costs and follows modified methods outlined in for example Camus and others, 2011, Reguero and others, 2013, and Lucero and others, 2017. Wind and wave parameters were extracted from the ERA5 reanalysis (Hersbach and others, 2020; https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/) for the hindcast period (1979–2019) and for the historical (1979-2014) and projected (2020-2050) time periods from WAVEWATCHIII wave model runs (Erikson and others, 2022) driven by winds and sea ice fields from the 6th generation Coupled Model Inter-comparison Projects (CMIP6 Haarsma and others, 2016 The extent of each model domain can be inferred from the browse graphic. Model input files are described in the Entity and Attribute Overview section.

The required grid and bathymetry files to run a nested spectral wave model (Simulating Waves WAves Nearshore [SWAN]; Booij and others, 1999) for the central Beaufort Sea coast of Alaska are provided. A three-level SWAN nesting grid with grid resolutions of 5000 meters, 1000 meters, and 200 meters for the overall, intermediate and detail grids, respectively (see included Browse Graphic) has been developed. For this purpose, available local bathymetry (Coastal Frontiers Corporation, 2014; Kasper and others, 2019) was merged with a larger-scale product (IBCAO Version 4.0 Compilation Group, 2020). Further details about the development of this model, model forcings and model settings can be found in Nederhoff and others (2021).

The required grid and bathymetry files to run a nested spectral wave model (Simulating Waves WAves Nearshore [SWAN]; Booij and others, 1999) for the central Beaufort Sea coast of Alaska are provided. A three-level SWAN nesting grid with grid resolutions of 5000 meters, 1000 meters, and 200 meters for the overall, intermediate and detail grids, respectively (see included Browse Graphic) has been developed. For this purpose, available local bathymetry (Coastal Frontiers Corporation, 2014; Kasper and others, 2019) was merged with a larger-scale product (IBCAO Version 4.0 Compilation Group, 2020). Further details about the development of this model, model forcings and model settings can be found in Nederhoff and others (2021).

A model application using the phase-averaged wave model SWAN was developed to simulate wind waves in South San Francisco Bay, California, between May 30, 2021, and May 19, 2022. This data release describes the development of the model application, provides input files suitable for running the model using Delft3D version 4.04.01, and includes output from the model simulations in netCDF format.