"Child Neglect: Cross Sector Service Paths & Outcomes" was the first phase of a project that is part of a competitive renewal (scheduled to end in 2008). Using administrative data drawn from education, health, juvenile corrections and social service agencies, this study compared cross sector service paths and outcomes of children in families receiving AFDC and reported to child welfare agencies (1993-1994) compared to a group of children matched by birth year and county of residence in families receiving AFDC, but not reported to child welfare agencies. Children were born 1982 through 1994 and were all under the age of 12 at the study onset. The total number of children in the sample is 10,187. Of the total sample, 5,087 of the children were in the Maltreatment/AFDC group and 5,100 children were in the AFDC Only group. The first phase study AIMS compared maltreated to non-maltreated children according to: (1) Cross-sector service use (sequence, frequency, co-occurrence & duration); (2) The relationship of service patterns to child and adolescent outcomes (e.g. mortality, foster care entry, entry into Special Education, etc.); (3) The association between certain caretaker level outcomes (e.g., permanent exit from AFDC) and child and adolescent outcomes. The AIMS were also examined according to type of maltreatment within the maltreated sample group. Key findings indicate that a report of maltreatment does contribute to the risk of special education entry, death, and entry into juvenile corrections above and beyond poverty. Overall, low-income children who also had maltreatment reports had higher rates of service use and negative outcomes across systems. The children in the maltreated group also entered more service systems on average than the low-income only group. A caretaker's permanent exit from a first spell on AFDC was associated with lower risk of certain negative outcomes like juvenile court petitions. This relationship was stronger for the low-income only group. In general, first reports of neglect, physical abuse or mixed type maltreatment were equally likely to result in later poor outcomes. However, children reported for neglect and mixed type(majority includes neglect) maltreatment were more likely to have recurrent reports of maltreatment and recurrent reports were associated with more negative outcomes. Investigators: Jonson-Reid, M., & Drake, B.

"Child Neglect: Cross Sector Service Paths & Outcomes" was the first phase of a project that is part of a competitive renewal (scheduled to end in 2008). Using administrative data drawn from education, health, juvenile corrections and social service agencies, this study compared cross sector service paths and outcomes of children in families receiving AFDC and reported to child welfare agencies (1993-1994) compared to a group of children matched by birth year and county of residence in families receiving AFDC, but not reported to child welfare agencies. Children were born 1982 through 1994 and were all under the age of 12 at the study onset. The total number of children in the sample is 10,187. Of the total sample, 5,087 of the children were in the Maltreatment/AFDC group and 5,100 children were in the AFDC Only group. The first phase study AIMS compared maltreated to non-maltreated children according to: (1) Cross-sector service use (sequence, frequency, co-occurrence & duration); (2) The relationship of service patterns to child and adolescent outcomes (e.g. mortality, foster care entry, entry into Special Education, etc.); (3) The association between certain caretaker level outcomes (e.g., permanent exit from AFDC) and child and adolescent outcomes. The AIMS were also examined according to type of maltreatment within the maltreated sample group. Key findings indicate that a report of maltreatment does contribute to the risk of special education entry, death, and entry into juvenile corrections above and beyond poverty. Overall, low-income children who also had maltreatment reports had higher rates of service use and negative outcomes across systems. The children in the maltreated group also entered more service systems on average than the low-income only group. A caretaker's permanent exit from a first spell on AFDC was associated with lower risk of certain negative outcomes like juvenile court petitions. This relationship was stronger for the low-income only group. In general, first reports of neglect, physical abuse or mixed type maltreatment were equally likely to result in later poor outcomes. However, children reported for neglect and mixed type(majority includes neglect) maltreatment were more likely to have recurrent reports of maltreatment and recurrent reports were associated with more negative outcomes. Investigators: Jonson-Reid, M., & Drake, B.

,Child Maltreatment Reports contain data from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System that have been aggregated to the State level,

Counts and rates of children who received an investigation or alternative response from child protective services agencies for the last five federal fiscal years for which data are available. To view more National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) findings, click link to summary page below: https://healthdata.gov/stories/s/kaeg-w7jc

전북특별자치도 시군별 요보호아동 발생 현황(발생원인 및 그에 따른 요보호아동 수)우리 기관에서는 더 이상 생성 불가 데이터입니다.

보건복지부에서 관리하는 보건복지현황 중 2015년~2019년까지 시도별 아동학대 발생현황(시도구분, 년도, 아동학대유형_중복학대, 아동학대유형_신체학대, 아동학대유형_정서학대, 등)에 대한 정보를 제공 합니다.

보건복지부에서 2015년~2022년까지 한 해 동안 신고ㆍ접수 및 보호된 아동학대 유형별 발생 현황을 시도별로 분류하여 정보를 제공하고 있습니다.<통계 이용 시 주의사항>1). 아동학대 신고･접수 건 중 일반상담 건수를 제외한 사례 중 아동학대로 판정되어 보호된 사례를 아동학대 발생 현황으로 보고2). 아동학대 발생 건수는 해마다 신고율이 증가하여 학대피해아동이 늘어나는 현상을 보이는 것으로 실제 학대가 증가했다고 볼 수는 없음

Numbers and rates of child victims for the last five federal fiscal years for which the data are available. To view more National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) findings, click link to summary page below: https://healthdata.gov/stories/s/kaeg-w7jc

아동·청소년의 인권실태 및 이와 관련한 생활 변화 양상 파악을 위해, 아동·청소년이 직접 경험한 인권관련 생활 및 정보, 아동·청소년들이 생각하는 인권에 대한 인식 등을 파악하는 자료를 수집