Valley and Ridge aquifers
공공데이터포털
This data set represents the extent of the Valley and Ridge aquifers in the states of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Tennesse, Georgia, and Alabama.
Pennsylvanian aquifers
공공데이터포털
This data set represents the extent of the Pennsylvanian aquifers in the states of Pennsylavania, West Virginia, Ohio, Virginia, Kentucky, North Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan.
Thickness of the Surficial Aquifer, Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware
공공데이터포털
A digital map of the thickness of the surficial unconfined aquifer, including from the land surface and unsaturated zone to the bottom of sediments of geologic units identified as part of the surficial aquifer, was produced to improve understanding of the hydrologic system in the Maryland and Delaware portions of the Delmarva Peninsula. The map is intended to be used in conjunction with other environmental coverages (such land use, wetlands, and soil characteristics) to provide a subsurface hydrogeologic component to studies of nitrate transport that have historically relied on maps of surficial features. It could also be used to study the transport of other water soluble chemicals. The map was made using the best currently available data, which was of varying scales. It was created by overlaying a high resolution land surface and bathymetry digital elevation model (DEM) on a digital representation of the base of the surficial aquifer, part of hydrogeologic framework, as defined by Andreasen and others (2013). Thickness was calculated as the difference between the top of land surface and the bottom of the surficial aquifer sediments, which include sediments from geologic formations of late-Miocene through Quaternary age. Geologic formations with predominantly sandy surficial sediments that comprise the surficial aquifer on the Delmarva Peninsula include the Parsonsburg Sand, Sinepuxent Formation (Fm.), and parts of the Omar Fm. north of Indian River Bay in Delaware, the Columbia Fm., Beaverdam Fm., and Pennsauken Fm. (Ator and others 2005; Owens and Denney, 1986; Mixon, 1985; Bachman and Wilson, 1984). Formations with mixed texture and sandy stratigraphy including the Scotts Corner Fm. and Lynch Heights Fm. in Delaware are also considered part of the surficial aquifer (Ramsey, 1997). Subcropping aquifers and confining beds underlie the surficial aquifer throughout the Peninsula and may increase or limit its thickness, respectively (Andreasen and others, 2013). Stream incision through the surficial aquifer into older fine-textured sediments is more common in the northern part of the Peninsula where confined aquifers and their confining beds subcrop beneath the surficial aquifer. The potential for nitrate transport is greatest where relatively coarse sediments of the unconfined surficial aquifer (such as sand and gravel), are present beneath uplands and streams. Where these sediments are truncated and the streambed is incised into underlying fine-textured sediments, the potential for nitrate transport is much less and typically limited to stream-bank seeps that flow across the floodplain. In parts of south-central Maryland and southern Delaware the surficial aquifer sediments are complex with surficial sandy sediments generally less than 20 ft thick (indicated as 19 ft on the map). They include the Parsonsburg Sand and some surficial sandy facies of the Omar Fm. underlain by predominantly fine-textured sediments of the Walston Silt and Omar Fm. (Denney and others, 1979; Owens and Denney, 1979). Even though the surficial aquifer is relatively thin in this area, extensive ditching of flat poorly drained farmland allows seasonal transport of nitrate from groundwater to streams when the water table is above the base of the ditches (Lindsey and others, 2003). Geologic units of the Coastal Lowlands that surround the Peninsula are relatively thin in many areas and are primarily composed of fine-grained estuarine deposits with some coarse-textured sediments, in particular remnant beach-ridge and dune deposits (Ator and others, 2005). The Kent Island Fm. (Owens and Denney, 1986), which is part of the Coastal Lowlands on the western side of the Peninsula, has predominantly fine-grained sediments and is not included in the surficial aquifer in Maryland, as defined by Bachman and Wilson (1984); the surficial aquifer is shown to have 0 ft thickness on the map in the area mapped as Kent Island Fm. Also shown on the map as 0 ft thickness are
Extents of the aquifer and confining units of the Atlantic Coastal Plain of North and South Carolina aquifer system (pp1773 extents)
공공데이터포털
The data set pp1773_extents contains polygon datasets that represent the areal extents of each of the 16 hydrogeologic units of the of the Atlantic Coastal Plain of North and South Carolina. [The total areal extent includes a small area in southeastern Virginia, the Atlantic Coastal Plain within North Carolina and South Carolina, and a region in southeast Georgia within the Atlantic Coastal Plain.] Each hydrogeological unit is referred to as its model layer number as represented in the report PP1773. For clarity, they are listed below along with the aquifer unit or confining unit name in North Carolina and its correlated unit name in South Carolina. L1 Surficial aquifer L2 Yorktown confining unit / Upper Floridan confining unit L3 Yorktown aquifer / Upper Floridan aquifer L4 Castle Hayne - Pungo River confining unit / Middle Floridan confining unit (To be referred to as "Castle Hayne / Middle Floridan confining unit" in this document) L5 Castle Hayne - Pungo River aquifer / Middle Floridan aquifer (To be referred to as "Castle Hayne - Middle Floridan aquifer" in this document) L6 Beaufort confing unit / Gordon confining unit L7 Beaufort aquifer / Gordon aquifer L8 Peedee confining unit / Crouch Branch confining unit L9 Peedee aquifer / Crouch Branch aquifer L10 Black Creek confining unit / McQueen Branch confining unit L11 Black Creek aquifer / McQueen Branch aquifer L12 Upper Cape Fear confining unit / Charleston confining unit L13 Upper Cape Fear aquifer / Charleston aquifer L14 Lower Cape Fear confining unit / Gramling confining unit L15 Lower Cape Fear aquifer / Gramling aquifer L16 Lower Cretaceous confining unit and aquifer Spatial data set pp1773_layer1_extent represents the extent of the top of the surficial aquifer, which is Layer 1 in the groundwater model used to simulate the aquifer system described in PP 1773. The surficial aquifer is the uppermost aquifer. It is an unconfined aquifer that is uniformly present except where it is incised by streams. The top of the surficial aquifer is equivalent to the land surface. The extent was derived primarily by geologic and hydraulic properties, as the surficial aquifer is an unconfined layer primarily composed of sediments of Quaternary age, plus some older sediments in areas due to a different stratigraphic position of the first underlying confining layer. Spatial data set pp_1773_layer_2 is the Yorktown/Upper Floridan confining unit. It is not composed of a single unit because the unit's series of clay and silt beds vary greatly in stratigraphic position. Spatial dataset pp1773_layer3_extent represents the extent of the Yorktown/Upper Floridan aquifer. The Yorktown aquifer is present only in the northern half of the North Carolina Coastal Plain. Outliers exist in Robeson, Bladen and Dublin counties, but are not separated from the surficial aquifer by a confining unit, and not considered a distinct aquifer in these areas. The Upper Floridan aquifer extent covers a southern portion of South Carolina and southern portion of Georgia. Spatial dataset pp1773_layer4_extent represents the extent of the Castle Hayne/Middle Floridan confining unit. The Castle Hayne confining unit consists of beds of clay and silt that vary in stratigraphic position and are absent in a number of areas in the central and southern North Carolina Coastal Plain. The Middle Floridan confining unit extends from South Carolina to southern Georgia. It is not continuous with the Castle Hayne confining unit. Spatial dataset pp1773_layer5_extent represents the extent of the Castle Hayne/Middle Floridan aquifer. The Castle Hayne aquifer is located in the central and southern North Carolina Coastal Plain; the Middle Floridan aquifer is more south, in southern South Carolina and southern Georgia. Spatial dataset pp1773_layer6_extent represents the extent of the Beaufort/Gordon confining unit. The Beaufort confining unit is located in northeastern North Carolina and southeastern Virginia. It is best developed in
Geodatabase of the available top and bottom surface datasets that represent the Mississippian aquifer, Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia
공공데이터포털
This geodatabase includes spatial datasets that represent the Mississippian aquifer in the States of Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia. The aquifer is divided into three subareas, based on the data availability. In subarea 1 (SA1), which is the aquifer extent in Iowa, data exist of the aquifer top altitude and aquifer thickness. In subarea 2 (SA2), which is the aquifer extent in Missouri, data exist of the aquifer top and bottom aquifer surface altitudes. In subarea 3 (SA3), which is the aquifer area of the remaining States, no altitude or thickness data exist. Included in this geodatabase are: (1) a feature dataset "ds40MSSPPI_altitude_and_thickness_contours that includes aquifer altitude and thickness contours used to generate the surface rasters for SA1 and SA2, (2) a feature dataset "ds40MSSPPI_extents" that includes a polygon dataset that represents the subarea extents, a polygon dataset that represents the combined overall aquifer extent, and a polygon dataset of the Ft. Dodge Fault and Manson Anomaly, (3) raster datasets that represent the altitude of the top and the bottom of the aquifer in SA1 and SA2, and (4) georeferenced images of the figures that were digitized to create the aquifer top- and bottom-altitude contours or aquifer thickness contours for SA1 and SA2. The images and digitized contours are supplied for reference. The extent of the Mississippian aquifer for all subareas was produced from the digital version of the HA-730 Mississippian aquifer extent, (USGS HA-730). For the two Subareas with vertical-surface information, SA1 and SA2, data were retrieved from the sources as described below. 1. The aquifer-altitude contours for the top and the aquifer-thickness contours for the top-to-bottom thickness of SA1 were received in digital format from the Iowa Geologic Survey. The URL for the top was ftp://ftp.igsb.uiowa.edu/GIS_Library/IA_State/Hydrologic/Ground_Waters/ Mississippian_aquifer/mississippian_topography.zip. The URL for the thickness was ftp://ftp.igsb.uiowa.edu/GIS_Library/IA_State/Hydrologic/Ground_Waters/ Mississippian_aquifer/mississippian_isopach.zip Reference for the top map is Altitude and Configuration, in feet above mean sea level, of the Mississipian Aquifer modified from a scanned image of Map 1, Sheet 1, Miscellaneous Map Series 3, Mississippian Aquifer of Iowa by P.J. Horick and W.L. Steinhilber, Iowa Geological Survey, 1973; IGS MMS-3, Map 1, Sheet 1 Reference for the thickness map is Distribution and isopach thickness, in feet, of the Mississipian Aquifer, modified from a scanned image of Map 1, Sheet 2, Miscellaneous Map Series 3, Mississippian Aquifer of Iowa by P.J. Horick and W.L. Steinhilber, Iowa Geological Survey, 1973; IGS MMS-3, Map 1, Sheet 2 2. The altitude contours for the top and bottom of SA2 were digitized from georeferenced figures of altitude contours in U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1305 (USGS PP1305), figure 6 (for the top surface) and figure 9 (for the bottom surface). The altitude contours for SA1 and SA2 were interpolated into surface rasters within a GIS using tools that create hydrologically correct surfaces from contour data, derive the altitude from the thickness (depth from the land surface), and merge the subareas into a single surface. The primary tool was an enhanced version of "Topo to Raster" used in ArcGIS, ArcMap, Esri 2014. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2 Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute. The raster surfaces were corrected in areas where the altitude of the top of the aquifer exceeded the land surface, and where the bottom of an aquifer exceeded the altitude of the corrected top of the aquifer.
Digital elevations and extents of regional hydrogeologic units in the Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system (ver. 1.1, January 2021)
공공데이터포털
A digital model of the sedimentary Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system is composed of 20 rasters and hydrogeologic unit extent polygons. Rasters describe the top elevations of regional aquifers and confining units at a resolution of 2640 feet (1/2 mile). The rasters are clipped to the extent polygons, which represent the spatial extents of the hydrogeologic units onshore and several miles offshore. This three-dimensional hydrogeologic model was constructed as part of a U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Resources Program study of groundwater availability in the Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain (NACP) aquifer system, including parts of New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina. Digital elevations of major regional aquifers and confining units were compiled from published digital elevation models (DEM) of various parts of the NACP aquifer system to provide a consistent regional model of hydrogeologic unit geometries. The many studies incorporated within these data include the interpretation and analysis of thousands of well logs and other related information spanning at least a century of study. These regional units are derived from published unit-elevation contours interpreted by geologists at the state and local level, and incorporate little additional interpretation of unit elevations beyond the correlation of individual units across geographic boundaries and some extrapolation of units to the edges of the modeled area. This regionally consistent hydrogeologic framework was used as the foundation of a MODFLOW groundwater flow model of the NACP, which informed modifications to the regional hydrogeologic units that have now been incorporated into the framework data.
Digital elevations and extents of regional hydrogeologic units in the Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system (ver. 1.1, January 2021)
공공데이터포털
A digital model of the sedimentary Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system is composed of 20 rasters and hydrogeologic unit extent polygons. Rasters describe the top elevations of regional aquifers and confining units at a resolution of 2640 feet (1/2 mile). The rasters are clipped to the extent polygons, which represent the spatial extents of the hydrogeologic units onshore and several miles offshore. This three-dimensional hydrogeologic model was constructed as part of a U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Resources Program study of groundwater availability in the Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain (NACP) aquifer system, including parts of New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina. Digital elevations of major regional aquifers and confining units were compiled from published digital elevation models (DEM) of various parts of the NACP aquifer system to provide a consistent regional model of hydrogeologic unit geometries. The many studies incorporated within these data include the interpretation and analysis of thousands of well logs and other related information spanning at least a century of study. These regional units are derived from published unit-elevation contours interpreted by geologists at the state and local level, and incorporate little additional interpretation of unit elevations beyond the correlation of individual units across geographic boundaries and some extrapolation of units to the edges of the modeled area. This regionally consistent hydrogeologic framework was used as the foundation of a MODFLOW groundwater flow model of the NACP, which informed modifications to the regional hydrogeologic units that have now been incorporated into the framework data.