The Pakistan Reading Project (PRP) is a $165 million, seven-year initiative launched in July 2013 that aims to improve the quality of early grade reading instruction for 1.3 million public and private primary school students across Pakistan. The PRP implements activities through three main components: (1) improved classroom learning environment for reading, (2) improved policies and systems for reading, and (3) community-based support for reading. This data asset includes evaluation results from PRP activities implemented in Balochistan. The original project design included simultaneous implementation in all schools. However, through contract modifications, the project split its interventions into three cohorts: PRP Cohort 1&2, PRP Cohort 3, and Light Treatment. Datasets with names including "2013-2017 Baseline Midline" include baseline and midline data. For baseline-midline analyses, PRP Cohort 1&2 (2017) compares with Full Treatment (2013) and Light Treatment (2017) compares with Light Treatment (2013). PRP Cohort 3 (2017) is considered a baseline and the dataset's file name includes "2017 Baseline."

The USAID-funded Pakistan Reading Project (PRP) was conceived by USAID and the Government of Pakistan to address the reading deficit in Pakistani schools. PRP aims to improve children’s Urdu and Sindhi reading skills in grades 1 and 2 and through pilot interventions improve reading in Pashto. Project focus areas are Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJ&K), Balochistan, Federal Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Gilgit Baltistan (GB) and Sindh. This data asset contains the data from the Read Foundation Evaluation Survey carried out in the Pakistan Reading Project intervention regions including Azad Jammu Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit Baltistan (GB) in 2017 and 2019. The sampling designed called for a two-stage cluster sample. In the first stage, sample schools were selected from the available READ Foundation’s school population. Four districts were randomly selected from AJK along with two of GB (Gilgit and Astore), where the READ Foundation has its schools. Schools were elected as per available proportion. The ratio of rural/urban & summer/winter schools from the available district school population was also considered. In the second stage, 15 students from grade one and 15 from grade two were randomly selected within each selected sampled school. Respective grade level teachers were also interviewed and their teaching practices were also observed during the lesson delivery in the classrooms. The data were collected at two different stages of project implementation. Firstly as the baseline and secondly, after two years as end-line, when the students received complete two years of treatment. The study data is split into three datasets. The dataset 1 includes the data about student EGRA scores and interview questions about reading practices at school and home/community. Dataset 2 includes the data of teacher questionnaire and dataset 3 includes teacher classroom observations regarding teachers’ teaching practices in the classroom.

The Liberia Teacher Training Program II (LTTP II) is a partnership between FHI 360 and RTI International to provide support to the central Ministry of Education (MOE). The overarching goal of LTTP II is to enhance pupils' learning in general, and reading proficiency in particular; establish a functional teacher professional development (PD) system; and strengthen the MOE’s capacity to manage such a system. The LTTP II was originally designed to work in nine counties: Grand Gedeh, Grand Kru, Lofa, Maryland, Montserrado, Nimba, River Cess, River Gee, and Sinoe. In 2011 and 2012, because of changes in USAID policies, the number of counties was reduced to five (i.e., Bong, Lofa, Margibi, Montserrado, and Nimba), which USAID identifies as a development corridor, containing a majority of the Liberian population. The LTTP II intervention drew on the EGRA Plus model to introduce similarly structured reading and math programs in grades 1, 2, and 3 to approximately 1,020 schools in four counties (i.e., Bong, Lofa, Montserrado, and Nimba) in a phased approach. Cohort 1, the first to receive support, had 792 schools. During the middle of the 2011/2012 school year, the reading program was introduced in all three grades in these schools. During the middle of the 2012/2013 school year, the mathematics program was introduced in all three grades. Cohort 2, consisting of approximately 330 schools, began participating in the program’s reading and mathematics interventions during the 2013/2014 school year and continued during the 2014/2015 school year. Some changes, although not significant, were made to the intervention approach for supporting the Cohort 2 schools. Schools in the four LTTP II counties were randomly assigned to the Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 groupings. These schools were then grouped in clusters of 12 schools based on geographic proximity, which would allow the program to deliver the interventions more efficiently Cohort 1: Schools from the four target counties included in Cohort 1 served as the treatment group for the midterm assessment. These schools stopped receiving LTTP II support after the midterm assessment, but they participated in the endline assessment, as a way to determine whether the gains that were achieved during the treatment were sustained. Cohort 2: Schools included in Cohort 2 in the same four counties began to receive treatment after the midterm assessment—thus, during the final two years of the program. Cohort 2 schools served as a control to which the Cohort 1 results were compared. The performance of Cohort 2 schools were to be compared to that of Cohort 1. The biggest challenge that the program faced regarding the implementation in Cohort 2 schools was the school closings because of the Ebola crisis. Schools were closed between September 2014 and February 2015. Even after the official reopening date, with the gradual actual opening of schools that required LTTP II to wait until schools were safe to open, it took several months to distribute books to schools and to train teachers which in turn severely affected the implementation of the treatment. External Cohort: A randomly selected sample of schools outside the four target counties served as another comparator, especially after Cohort 2 began receiving treatment alongside Cohort 1. Except for a small number of schools associated with the RTTIs, schools outside the four target counties did not participate in the program during the lifetime of LTTP II. This data file contains the 2011 EGRA baseline.