,

Water Quality Monitoring Site identifies locations across the state of Vermont where water quality data has been collected, including habitat, chemistry, fish and/or macroinvertebrates. Currently the layer is not maintained as site locations are provided through another means to the ANR Natural Resources Atlas.

The WBIDs and WBID Segments should be used in companion with River Main Stem Waterbodies (WBID) and WBID Watersheds to show the complete WBID cataloging system.

Vermont List of Priority Surface Waters outside CWA Section 303(d) is divided in to 4 parts; Parts B, D, E and F. The four-part list has managed by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VT DEC) in accordance with the Vermont Surface Water Assessment and Listing Methodology. Each part is considered to be outside the scope of Clean Water Act Section 303(d). PART B. IMPAIRED SURFACE WATERS - NO TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD DETERMINATION REQUIRED - all waters listed in Part B are assessed as impaired and do not require development of a TMDL as described in 40 CFR 130.7. Section 303d of the Federal Clean Water Act does not govern these waters. Impaired waters that do not need a TMDL are those where other pollution control requirements (such as best management practices) required by local, state or federal authority are expected to address all water-pollutant combinations and the Water Quality Standards are expected to be attained in a reasonable period of time. These waters correspond to Category 4b of EPA's Consolidated Assessment Listing Methodology. PART D. SURFACE WATERS WITH COMPLETED AND APPROVED TMDLs - all waters identified on Part D have appeared on a previous version of the Part A-303d List and also have completed and approved TMDLs in place. If future assessments show the impairment has been eliminated, the waters will remain on Part D as a means of TMDL tracking, however, the current assessment status of the water will be noted. These waters correspond to Category 4a of EPA's Consolidated Assessment Listing Methodology. PART E. SURFACE WATERS ALTERED BY EXOTIC SPECIES - waters appearing in Part E are assessed as altered. They represent situations to be given priority for management where aquatic habitat and/or other designated uses have been altered to the extent that one or more designated uses are not supported due to the presence of exotic aquatic species. This list currently includes waters altered by the proliferation of Eurasian watermilfoil, water chestnut, zebra mussels or the presence of alewives. These waters correspond to Category 4c of EPA's Consolidated Assessment Listing Methodology. PART F. SURFACE WATERS ALTERED BY FLOW REGULATION - waters appearing in Part F of the Vermont Priority Waters List are assessed as altered. They represent priority management situations where aquatic habitat and/or other designated uses have been altered by flow regulation to the extent that one or more designated uses are not supported. Alterations arise from flow fluctuation, obstructions, or other manipulations of water levels that originate from hydroelectric facilities or other dam operations or from water withdrawals for industrial or municipal water supply or snowmaking purposes. These waters correspond to Category 4c of EPA's Consolidated Assessment Listing Methodology.�

Physical measurements and attributes of stream crossing structures and adjacent stream reaches which are used to provide a relative rating of aquatic organism passage and geomorphic compatibility. Additional screening tools have been developed to identify the amount of habitat available above and below individual structures and the potential for retrofitting an existing structure for improved aquatic organism passage. Data can be used to identify And prioritize potential stream crossing replacements/retrofit projects to improve biological/stream processes and flood resiliency.

"This is a searchable database representing over 40 years of hydrogeologic information based on yield testing required for new and existing public water supply sources in Vermont. The VRWA final report (the basis for the development of SQL database) was limited to currently active or permitted drilled PCWS sources. This represents 203 PCWS sources and 1,082 observation points evaluated across the state up to 2008. The results of the study indicate that, overall, groundwater interference is not a chronic problem in Vermont. However, unacceptable interference � where a specific observation well source could no longer meet its design demand � was noted in several instances in areas of higher concentrations of PCWS sources. This database is dynamic and will be populated by the most current information available as part of the ongoing DEC Source Permitting process. Public water system source testing information will be added soon for evaluations completed from 2008 to present. These data may include other water systems where interference analyses were done such as Non-Transient Non-Community and Transient Non-Community wells. Since late 1980, protocols for the testing of new PCWS groundwater sources (e.g., drilled bedrock wells, drilled gravel wells), have existed in Vermont. These protocols were initially developed by the VDOH, which at that time was the regulatory body for new PCWS sources in Vermont. Since the transfer of PCWS regulatory authority to the WSD in 1991, requirements associated with the testing and permitting of new PCWS sources has been codified in the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 21: The Water Supply Rule. One aspect of the Source Permitting process is measuring and evaluating whether pumping a proposed PCWS will withdraw enough water to reduce water levels in the surrounding area. The majority of PCWS sources in Vermont are wells completed in fractured crystalline bedrock aquifers, with a more limited number completed in sand and gravel aquifers present in some valley locations. Due to the non-homogenous, anisotropic nature of these aquifers, the impact of water withdrawal on nearby private and public wells and springs is difficult to predict unless measured in the field. By monitoring water levels in nearby water supply wells and springs during a constant discharge test (pumping test) the observed or estimated impact can be predicted. The impact to existing drinking water supplies is called Interference and can range from non-existent to adverse � where there isn�t enough water to meet the demands of the current use. Adverse or unacceptable interference is required to be mitigated before a Source Permit can be issued. Existing source evaluation reports prepared between 1980 and 2008 by the environmental consulting community were reviewed to develop a geodatabase that includes key information about the pumped wells and observation wells and springs monitored during these tests. This information includes specific pumping test information, derived values such as aquifer transmissivity and storativity, the degree of interference noted at observation locations, and a determination of acceptable versus unacceptable interference. The database currently contains data from 1980-2008. Data from tests conducted from 2009 to the present will be entered over the next several months."

This GIS layer consists of the geographic location of active and inactive public (Community, non-transient non-community and transient non-community) water sources labeled by the Water System Identification Number (WSID) and source number (i.e. WL001 or IN002). The water source data and locations are drawn from the State Drinking Water database (SDWIS). The water sources are wells, springs and surface water intakes that predate regulations developed in the 1970s to the present. SDWIS is the repository for state and federal information collected from and about each public water system in Vermont, including bulk and bottled water facilities along with water production and water quality data. ",

,