This dataset includes raw and processed seismic data from the 2021 seismic survey at the San Emidio geothermal field in Nevada. In April and May 2021, 37 tri-axial short period seismographs were deployed in a 1.8km diameter cluster centered on 40.367278 N, 119.409019 W. The first data record started at 2021-04-06T07:09:10Z UTC and the last record ended at 2021-05-11T02:58:52Z UTC. The 37 stations included 29 SmartSolo IGU-16HR 3C all-in-one 5 Hz seismographs and 8 DataCube seismographs with 4.5 Hz HGS HG-6(B coil) tri-axial geophones. The raw format (level 0) data includes 353 GB of 500 sps SmartSolo data in native DLD format, 113 GB of 400 sps DataCube data in native DataCube format, and 3.4 GB of GPS data collected during the RTK GPS survey. The SAC data (level 1) files include 564 GB of hourly SAC files. The experiment was designed to monitor seismic activity before, during, and after the planned three-day plant maintenance shutdown April 19-21, 2021. The pumping stopped at 2021/04/19 12:51:45 UTC and resumed about 2021/04/21 21:00:00 UTC. The dataset is hosted in an AWS data lake, with an associated GDR data set providing the metadata. Links to both of these resources are included below. Additionally, this collection features data and metadata from a 2016 seismic survey at the same site for comparative analysis.

This is a collection of metadata from the 2021 seismic survey at the San Emidio geothermal field in Nevada. In April and May 2021, 37 tri-axial short period seismographs were deployed in a 1.8km diameter cluster centered on 40.367278 deg N, 119.409019 deg W. The first data record started at 2021-04-06T07:09:10Z UTC and the last record ended 2021-05-11T02:58:52Z UTC. The 37 stations included 29 SmartSolo IGU-16HR 3C all-in-one 5 Hz seismographs and 8 DataCube seismographs with 4.5 Hz HGS HG-6(B coil) tri-axial geophones. The raw format (level 0) data includes 353 GB of 500 sps SmartSolo data in native DLD format, 113 GB of 400 sps DataCube data in native DataCube format, and 3.4 GB of GPS data collected during the RTK GPS survey. The SAC data (level 1) files include 564 GB of hourly SAC files. The experiment was designed to monitor seismic activity before, during, and after the planned three-day plant maintenance shutdown April 19-21, 2021. The pumping stopped at 2021/04/19 12:51:45 UTC and resumed about 2021/04/21 21:00:00 UTC. The raw and processed data are in an associated GDR submission, linked below. The metadata here includes files containing experiment details, station locations, seismic data logger specifications, instrumentation specifications, and descriptions of data. Also included are data and metadata from a 2016 seismic survey at the same site.

The U.S. Geological Survey acquired high-resolution P- and S-wave seismic data across the Frijoles Fault strand of the San Gregorio Fault Zone (SGFZ) at northern Año Nuevo, California in 2012. SGFZ is a right-lateral fault system that is mainly offshore, and prior studies provide highly variable slip estimates, which indicates uncertainty about the seismic hazard it poses. Therefore, the primary goal of the seismic survey was to better understand the structure and geometry of the onshore section of the Frijoles Fault strand of the SGFZ. We deployed 118 geophones (channels) at 5-m spacing along a linear profile centered on the mapped surface trace of the Frijoles Fault and co-located active P- and S-wave sources at ~1-m offset from the geophones. Channel numbers increase from west to east along the profile. We generated P-waves using either a seisgun (www.utep.edu/science/ssf/Manuals/betsy_seisgun.pdf, accessed August 2022) or an accelerated weight-drop and S-waves by horizontally striking an aluminum block on both sides with a sledgehammer. We first deployed vertical-component geophones (40-Hz, SercelTM L40A, sensitivity of 22.34 volts/meter/second) to record P-wave sources, after which we replaced the vertical-component geophones with horizontal-component geophones (4.5-Hz, SercelTM L28-LBH, sensitivity of 31.3 volts/meter/second) to record S-wave sources. Refraction cables connected all geophones to two 60-channel Geometrics Stratavisor NX-60TM seismographs with 24-bit analog-to-digital converters. Each shot was recorded at a 0.5-ms sampling rate for two seconds, with data recording at 100 ms before the actual time of the shot. This data release provides the metadata needed to utilize the seismic data. Data Format and Files We combined each seismic trace for a given shot time into a shot gather, and the traces in each shot gather are ordered by channel numbers (1-118) based on the position of the geophones along the profile. Furthermore, we assigned a unique field number (FFID) to each shot gather, and we combined the shot gathers recorded from both seismographs into two SEG-Y files (Barry et al., 1975), 78023.segy (channels 1 to 60) and marine.segy (channels 61 to 118), which are stored in big-Endian, 4-byte IBM-floating-point format (format code 1). Data samples are in millivolts and can be converted to velocity using the geophone sensitivity values. Metadata for all profiles are contained in two text files and one xml file: PIE12.setup.csv, PIE12.location.csv, and PIE12Metadata.xml. The setup file describes the identification of shots recorded by the two seismographs, channel number, recording stations (geophones), and the source type for both SEG-Y files. The location file describes the channel number, latitude, and longitude of all geophone locations. Reference Barry, K.M., Cavers, D.A., and Kneale, C.W., 1975, Recommended standards for digital tape formats: Geophysics, vol. 40, no. 2, p. 344-352, doi: 10.1190/1.1440530.

In August 2017, the U.S. Geological Survey acquired high-resolution P- and S-wave seismic data near six Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) recording stations in southern California: CI.OLI Olinda; CI.SRN Serrano; CI.MUR Murrieta; CI.LCG La Cienega; CI.RUS Rush; and CI.STC Santa Clara (Figure 1). These strong-motion recording stations are located inside Southern California Edison electrical substations, critical infrastructures that provide essential services to millions of customers. The primary goals of the seismic survey were to understand the potential for amplified ground shaking and to evaluate lateral variability in shear-wave velocity at these sites. We deployed up to 88 geophones at 2-m or 4-m spacing along seven linear profiles surrounding the stations and collocated P- and S-wave sources at ~1-m offset from the geophones. We generated P waves using three types of active sources: a 226-kg vertical accelerated weight-drop (AWD), a 3.5-kg sledgehammer and steel plate combination, and a 2.7-kg hammer and steel plate combination. Active-source S-waves were generated by horizontally striking an aluminum block with a 3.5-kg sledgehammer and by striking a 45-angle aluminum block with a 45°-angle AWD. We first deployed vertical-component geophones (40-Hz, SercelTM L40A, sensitivity of 22.34 volts/meter/second) to record P-wave shots, after which the vertical-component geophones were replaced with horizontal-component geophones (4.5-Hz, SercelTM L28-LBH, sensitivity of 31.3 volts/meter/second) to record S-wave shots. All data were recorded using up to two 60-channel Geometrics Stratavisor NX-60TM seismographs with 24-bit analog-to-digital converters. The seismographs were connected to the geophones via refraction cables. Each shot was recorded at a 0.5-ms sampling rate for two seconds, with data recording starting 100 ms before the actual time of the shot. Ambient noise data were recorded with vertical-component geophones at a 2-ms sampling rate for 120 seconds. This report provides the metadata needed to utilize the seismic data. Acknowledgements: Keith Galvin, Koichi Hayashi, Dan Langermann, Tony Martin, Devin McPhillips, Ian Richardson, David Saucedo-Green, Luther Strayer, Nathan Suits, and Alan Yong Reference: Subcommittee of the SEG Engineering and Groundwater Geophysics Committee, Pullan, S. E., Chairman, 1990, Recommended standard for seismic (/radar) data files in the personal computer environment: Geophysics, vol. 55, no. 9, p. 1260-1271.

This submission includes a high-precision seismic event catalog estimated from seismic data collected at San Emidio, Nevada from April to May 2022. The catalog lists the precise time, location, and magnitude of microseismic events recorded during this period. Both the seismic data and microseismic event catalog were produced as part of the Water & Hole Observations Leverage Effective Stress Calculations and Lessen Expenses (WHOLESCALE) project. Attached here are the microseismic event catalog, a link to the raw seismic data, and a detailed description of methods used to create the catalog.

In May 2019, the U.S. Geological Survey acquired high resolution P- and S-wave seismic data near six seismic network recording stations in San Bernardino County, California: Southern California Seismic Network CI.CLT Calelectic, CI.MLS Mira Loma, CI.CJM Cajon Mountain and CI.HLN Highland; California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program station CE.23542; and US National Strong-Motion Network station NP.5326 (Figure 1). The primary goals of the seismic survey were to better understand the potential for amplified ground shaking, to evaluate lateral variability in shear-wave velocity, and to calculate Vs30 at these sites. We deployed up to 67 DTCC SmartSolo 3-component seismometer systems ("nodes") at 2-m spacing along six linear arrays and collocated P- and S-wave sources at ~1-m offset from the nodes. We generated active-source P-waves using a 3.5-kg sledgehammer and steel plate combination. Active-source S-waves were generated by horizontally striking an aluminum block with a 3.5-kg sledgehammer. SmartSolo nodes are standalone seismometers with 3-component sensors (5-Hz corner frequency and sensitivity of 76.7 volts/meter/second), battery, and built-in GPS to record location and time. The nodes recorded seismic data continuously at a 0.5-ms sampling rate, and shot timing was recorded by GPS event capture hardware to precisely determine the shot times. For some individual surveys, the nodes were buried a few inches below the ground surface to reduce noise. This report provides the metadata needed to utilize the seismic data. Acknowledgements: We thank Garet Huddleston, Dan Langermann, Carolyn Stieban, Zhenning Ma, Luther Strayer, and Chris Green for assistance in data acquisition. Reference: Barry, K.M., Cavers, D.A. and Kneale, C.W., 1975, Recommended standards for digital tape formats: Geophysics, vol. 40, no. 2, p. 344-352.

Included here are seismic data recorded at the San Emidio Geothermal field in Nevada. This passive seismic data were collected as part of the DOE-funded Subsurface Technology and Engineering R&D (SubTER) project to advance imaging and characterization of geothermal permeability. In December 2016, 1301 vertical-component seismic instruments were deployed at the San Emidio Geothermal field in Nevada. Data collection spanned a 160 hour timeframe, beginning on December 5th and ending on December 11th. Data are stored as individual files in one-minute increments in SEGD and MSEED formats and are downloadable as a zipped directory or available in a cloud-accessible format. Comprehensive metadata and project summaries are included in GDR submission 1386 (linked below as "2016 Seismic Survey Metadata at San Emidio").