PURPOSE: To monitor juvenile Atlantic salmon densities over time. DESCRIPTION: Indices of freshwater production are derived annually from electrofishing surveys in Southeast New Brunswick. Juvenile Atlantic salmon abundances at sites, divided by age or size group and reported in terms of number of fish per habitat area sampled (density), are obtained using successive removal sampling or catch per unit effort sampling (which is calibrated using successive removal sampling data). Sampling intensities vary among years and among rivers. This dataset comprises raw data on all fish captured and effort invested in the course of monitoring juvenile Atlantic salmon in Southeast, New Brunswick, from 1974 to 2024. Sampling was focused on habitat suitable for Atlantic salmon, and capture of any other species was incidental. PARAMETERS COLLECTED: Distribution (ecological); species counts (ecological); fish lengths (biological); fish weights (biological); point (spatial). USE LIMITATION: To ensure scientific integrity and appropriate use of the data, we would encourage you to contact the data custodian.

PURPOSE: To track juvenile Atlantic salmon densities. DESCRIPTION: Indices of freshwater production are derived annually from electrofishing surveys in the Miramichi River of New Brunswick. Juvenile salmon abundances at sites, in terms of number of fish per habitat area sampled by age or size group (densities), are obtained using successive removal sampling or catch per unit effort sampling calibrated to densities. Sampling intensities vary among years and among rivers. PARAMETERS COLLECTED: Species counts (ecological); point (spatial). USE LIMITATION: To ensure scientific integrity and appropriate use of the data, we would encourage you to contact the data custodian.

The dataset is composed of six tables containing environmental DNA (eDNA) and electrofishing data from American eel (Anguilla rostrata) surveys conducted on parts of the Mohawk River watershed and tributaries to the Hudson River in New York. The dataset includes (a) eDNA data from 36 sites in the Mohawk River watershed and adjacent areas including parts of the Eastern Erie Canal, Mohawk River, and tributaries that were sampled in spring 2021 and again in summer 2021,(b) paired eDNA/electrofishing data from 15 sites on tributaries to the Hudson River that were sampled between 2020 and 2021, and (c) model output of predicted American eel density from all sites in the Mohawk River watershed and adjacent areas where eDNA was detected. The table "MohawkHudsonEel_MohawkScreening_eDNAData" contains eDNA data from the 36 sites in the Mohawk River watershed, the table "MohawkHudsonEel_MohawkScreening_SiteData" contains supporting information on the 36 sites in the Mohawk River watershed, the table "MohawkHudsonEel_HudsonTribCalibration_LWData" contains the length and weight for all American eel captured during electrofishing surveys from the 15 sites on tributaries to the Hudson River, the table "MohawkHudsonEel_HudsonTribCalibration_eDNAData" contains eDNA data from the 15 sites on tributaries to the Hudson River, the table "MohawkHudsonEel_HudsonTribCalibration_SiteData" contains supporting information on the 15 sites on tributaries to the Hudson River including the dimensions of the reaches where electrofishing was conducted, and the table "MohawkHudsonEel_MohawkScreening_DensityEstimate" contains predicted density of American eel estimated from eDNA concentration using linear regression from all sites in the Mohawk River watershed and adjacent areas where eDNA was detected.

The dataset is composed of six tables containing environmental DNA (eDNA) and electrofishing data from American eel (Anguilla rostrata) surveys conducted on parts of the Mohawk River watershed and tributaries to the Hudson River in New York. The dataset includes (a) eDNA data from 36 sites in the Mohawk River watershed and adjacent areas including parts of the Eastern Erie Canal, Mohawk River, and tributaries that were sampled in spring 2021 and again in summer 2021,(b) paired eDNA/electrofishing data from 15 sites on tributaries to the Hudson River that were sampled between 2020 and 2021, and (c) model output of predicted American eel density from all sites in the Mohawk River watershed and adjacent areas where eDNA was detected. The table "MohawkHudsonEel_MohawkScreening_eDNAData" contains eDNA data from the 36 sites in the Mohawk River watershed, the table "MohawkHudsonEel_MohawkScreening_SiteData" contains supporting information on the 36 sites in the Mohawk River watershed, the table "MohawkHudsonEel_HudsonTribCalibration_LWData" contains the length and weight for all American eel captured during electrofishing surveys from the 15 sites on tributaries to the Hudson River, the table "MohawkHudsonEel_HudsonTribCalibration_eDNAData" contains eDNA data from the 15 sites on tributaries to the Hudson River, the table "MohawkHudsonEel_HudsonTribCalibration_SiteData" contains supporting information on the 15 sites on tributaries to the Hudson River including the dimensions of the reaches where electrofishing was conducted, and the table "MohawkHudsonEel_MohawkScreening_DensityEstimate" contains predicted density of American eel estimated from eDNA concentration using linear regression from all sites in the Mohawk River watershed and adjacent areas where eDNA was detected.

This data set summarizes electrofishing effort, observations, and tissue sampling of aquatic vertebrates near Yellow Pine, Idaho. Sampling was conducted using a backpack electrofishing unit at two reference sites including Cane Creek and Sugar Creek, and at three mine impact sites including Sugar Creek and Cinnabar Creek. Juvenile Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) were present at all five sites and were the primary species targeted during our sampling effort. Additional tissue samples of Sculpin, and amphibians were taken when available. Where possible, a two pass (quantitative depletion) electrofishing survey was conducted at each site for non-USGS stakeholders (Nez Perce Tribe and Idaho Department of Fish and Game) to estimate population density if necessary to fit project needs. Electrofishing efforts were immediately halted when adult spawning Bull Trout were encountered so as to minimize harm to that species and in those cases a two pass quantitative depletion survey was not completed. Both summarized and site specific data included are in tabular form. Data is presented in both .csv and .xlsx format, the content within the Excel workbook is the same content within each individual .csv and .jpeg.

This data set summarizes electrofishing effort, observations, and tissue sampling of aquatic vertebrates near Yellow Pine, Idaho. Sampling was conducted using a backpack electrofishing unit at two reference sites including Cane Creek and Sugar Creek, and at three mine impact sites including Sugar Creek and Cinnabar Creek. Juvenile Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) were present at all five sites and were the primary species targeted during our sampling effort. Additional tissue samples of Sculpin, and amphibians were taken when available. Where possible, a two pass (quantitative depletion) electrofishing survey was conducted at each site for non-USGS stakeholders (Nez Perce Tribe and Idaho Department of Fish and Game) to estimate population density if necessary to fit project needs. Electrofishing efforts were immediately halted when adult spawning Bull Trout were encountered so as to minimize harm to that species and in those cases a two pass quantitative depletion survey was not completed. Both summarized and site specific data included are in tabular form. Data is presented in both .csv and .xlsx format, the content within the Excel workbook is the same content within each individual .csv and .jpeg.

What? Juvenile salmonid densities are being monitored in various rivers within Cape Breton Highlands National Park using electrofishing surveys. When? Monitoring frequency occurs annually in the late summer/early fall once water temperatures have dropped below thermal stress thresholds for salmonids (<20oC) and water levels have started to rise above summer lows. How? Open sample plots are sampled with an electrofisher unit through an area of the river (from bank to bank) over a 300 second period. Stunned fish are captured, and species and morphometric data are collected. Fish, once recovered, are then returned to the river. Why? Fish populations are prominent components of aquatic ecosystems and a key node in the aquatic food web. Fish are sensitive to many forms of physical, chemical and biological stressors which alter fish condition, community structure and/or biomass. In addition to the indirect impacts humans have on fish communities, there are direct impacts associated with harvesting sport fish from park lakes and rivers. Sport fish such as Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) are important resources to monitor from the perspective of resource management of local populations.

We collected electrofishing, environmental DNA (eDNA), and habitat data from 2022 to 2024 in the Oregon portion of the Goose Lake Basin. Data were collected by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Oregon State University (OSU) to monitor native and non-native fish distributions in the Basin, and to relate observed abundances to specific habitat features. Sampling was conducted in collaboration with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) based on previous survey efforts, using a stratified random subset of sites surveyed by ODFW in 2007 and following the same protocols. We added eDNA to evaluate its efficacy as an alternative to traditional fish sampling methods, and all sample processing was carried out by the Levi Lab at OSU. During fish sampling efforts, we collected habitat data including channel width, depth, temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and substrate. These data are part of a broader, comprehensive monitoring effort in the Basin.

We collected electrofishing, environmental DNA (eDNA), and habitat data from 2022 to 2024 in the Oregon portion of the Goose Lake Basin. Data were collected by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Oregon State University (OSU) to monitor native and non-native fish distributions in the Basin, and to relate observed abundances to specific habitat features. Sampling was conducted in collaboration with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) based on previous survey efforts, using a stratified random subset of sites surveyed by ODFW in 2007 and following the same protocols. We added eDNA to evaluate its efficacy as an alternative to traditional fish sampling methods, and all sample processing was carried out by the Levi Lab at OSU. During fish sampling efforts, we collected habitat data including channel width, depth, temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and substrate. These data are part of a broader, comprehensive monitoring effort in the Basin.

The table provides all fish collected using two different electrofishing methods at Illinois River sites in 2012 and 2013. Length and weights were taken on most species and gender was taken from Silver Carp. Fishes were categorized whether they were netters (caught by nets) or jumpers (jumped in the boat while sampling) and only netters were used in analyses. Large numbers of shad were collected in 2013 and an additional spreadsheet includes abundance data in an aggregated form for those sites. The data is not sensitive/classified and there are no legal restrictions on who may obtain or use the data.