This is a pair of PowerPoint presentations from Neubrex Energy Services (US), LLC. The presentations review work done in April 2024 on crosswell strain fracture driven interactions (FDI) and microseismic event monitoring during hydraulic fracturing in stage 8 of Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32. Well 16B(78)-32 was the monitoring well and was where the data for these presentations were collected.

The report reviews results obtained by Neubrex using Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) during the 16B(78)-32 hydraulic fracturing operations, Stages 1–4. It details DAS data acquisition, processing, and analysis, with a focus on acoustic noise signatures recorded during each stage and the noise generated at each perforation cluster. Pumping curve data are integrated with fiber optic DAS results to derive relative injection allocation percentages for each cluster in each stage. The report also examines plug holding efficacy using DAS acoustic energy band data.

This report documents the use of fiber optic Rayleigh frequency shift (RFS) Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS), Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS), and microseismic data recorded during the hydraulic fracture stimulation of well 16A(78)-32, as detected in the offset well 16B(78)-32 in April 2024. The report from Neubrex reviews the spatial and temporal evolution of these measurements on the 16B well that is located above the 16A well in the reservoir. Hydraulic Pressure Pumping curve data is integrated with the fiber optic data. Microseismic data acquired and processed by Geo-Energie Suisse Suisse is also included in the integration and comparison to strain data acquired in the near field of 16B.

This report documents the use of fiber optic Rayleigh frequency shift (RFS) Distributed Strain Sensing (DSS), Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS), and microseismic data recorded during the hydraulic fracture stimulation of well 16A(78)-32, as detected in the offset well 16B(78)-32 in April 2024. The report from Neubrex reviews the spatial and temporal evolution of these measurements on the 16B well that is located above the 16A well in the reservoir. Hydraulic Pressure Pumping curve data is integrated with the fiber optic data. Microseismic data acquired and processed by Geo-Energie Suisse Suisse is also included in the integration and comparison to strain data acquired in the near field of 16B.

This report examines the fiber optic measurements made on the Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32 after it and well 16A(78)-32 were hydraulically stimulated and shortly thereafter a 9 hour cross well circulation test was run between them. The report reviews distributed fiber optic signal processing and analysis using Rayleigh Frequency Shift - Distributed Strain Sensing and Distributed Strain Sensing (RFS DTS) data. The data are integrated with pumping and discharge rate data from the two wells. All data are depth registered to Measured Depth (MD) Relative to Kelly Bushing (RKB).

This report examines the fiber optic measurements made on the Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32 after it and well 16A(78)-32 were hydraulically stimulated and shortly thereafter a 9 hour cross well circulation test was run between them. The report reviews distributed fiber optic signal processing and analysis using Rayleigh Frequency Shift - Distributed Strain Sensing and Distributed Strain Sensing (RFS DTS) data. The data are integrated with pumping and discharge rate data from the two wells. All data are depth registered to Measured Depth (MD) Relative to Kelly Bushing (RKB).

The FORGE team is making these fracture models available to researchers wanting a set of natural fractures in the FORGE reservoir for use in their own modeling work. They have been used to predict stimulation distances during hydraulic stimulation at the open toe section of well 16A(78)-32. This is a simplified DFN (discrete fracture network) dataset, that was generated using FracMan, for Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32. A short, well-illustrated, report describing the data is also included in the provided archive file.

The FORGE team is making these fracture models available to researchers wanting a set of natural fractures in the FORGE reservoir for use in their own modeling work. They have been used to predict stimulation distances during hydraulic stimulation at the open toe section of well 16A(78)-32. This is a simplified DFN (discrete fracture network) dataset, that was generated using FracMan, for Utah FORGE well 16A(78)-32. A short, well-illustrated, report describing the data is also included in the provided archive file.

This dataset contains a reinterpretation of the trip 3, Thrubit FMI log from Utah FORGE well 16B(78)-32, covering measured depths from 6,254 to 10,839 feet. Acquired by Schlumberger on May 23, 2023, this version includes newly interpreted tensile drilling-induced fractures, in addition to previously identified structural and fracture features. The data are formatted in CWLS LAS 3.0 and include labeled measurements such as caliper, borehole azimuth and deviation, bedding dip and azimuth, and attributes of both natural and induced fractures. Users should be familiar with LAS file formats and FMI interpretation methods.

This dataset comprises Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) data collected from the Utah FORGE monitoring well 16B(78)-32 (the producer well) during hydraulic fracture stimulation operations conducted in April 2024. The data were acquired continuously over the stimulation period at a temporal sampling rate of 10,000 Hz (10 kS/s) and a spatial resolution of approximately 3.35 feet (1.02109 meters). The measurements were captured using a Neubrex NBX-S4100 Time Gated Digital DAS interrogator unit connected to a single-mode fiber optic cable, which was permanently installed within the casing string. All recorded channels correspond to downhole segments of the fiber optic cable, from a measured depth (MD) of 5,369.35 feet to 10,352.11 feet. The DAS data reflect raw acoustic energy generated by physical processes within and surrounding the well during stimulation activities at wells 16A(78)-32 and 16B(78)-32. These data have potential applications in analyzing cross-well strain, far-field strain rates (including microseismic activity), induced seismicity, and seismic imaging. Metadata embedded in the attributes of the HDF5 files include detailed information on the measured depths of the channels, interrogation parameters, and other acquisition details. The dataset also includes a recording of a seminar held on September 19, 2024, where Neubrex's Chief Operating Officer presented insights into the data collection, analysis, and preliminary findings. The raw data files, stored in HDF5 format, are organized chronologically according to the recording intervals from April 9 to April 24, 2024, with each file corresponding to a 12-second recording interval.