Overview This directory was developed to provide discovery information for anyone looking for publicly accessible repositories that house geological materials in the U.S. and Canada. In addition, this resource is intended to be a tool to facilitate a community of practice. The need for the directory was identified during planning for and follow-up from a drill core repository webinar series in Spring 2020 for public repository curators and staff in the U.S. and Canada hosted by the Minnesota Geological Survey and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Additional supporting sponsors included the U.S. Geological Survey National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program and the Association of American State Geologists Data Preservation Committee. The 10-part webinar series provided overviews of state, provincial, territorial, and national repositories that house drill core, other geoscience materials, and data. When the series concluded a small working group of the participants continued to meet to facilitate the development and production of a directory of repositories that maintain publicly-accessible geological materials throughout the U.S. and Canada. The group used previous directory efforts described in the next section, Summary of Historical Repository Directory Compilation Efforts, as guides for content during development. The working group prepared and compiled responses from a call for repository information and characterization. This directory is planned to be a living resource for the geoscience community with updates every other year to accommodate changes. The updates will facilitated through versioned updates of this data release. Summary of Historical Repository Directory Compilation Efforts 1957 – Sample and Core Repositories of the United States, Alaska, and Canada. Published by AAPG. Committee on Preservation of Samples and Cores. 13 members from industry, academia, and government. 1977 – Well-Sample and Core Repositories of the Unites States and Canada, C.K. Fisher; M.P. Krupa, USGS Open file report 77-567.USGS wanted to update the original index. Includes a map showing core repositories by “State” “University” “Commercial” and “Federal”. Also includes a “Brief Statement of Requirements for the Preservation of Subsurface Material and Data” and referral to state regulations for details on preserved materials. 1984 - Nonprofit Sample and Core Repositories Open to the Public in the United States – USGS Circular 942. James Schmoker, Thomas Michalski, Patricia Worl. The survey was conducted by a questionnaire mailed to repository curators. Information on additions, corrections, and deletions to earlier (1957,1977) directories from state geologists, each state office of the Water Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey, additional government agencies and colleagues were also used. 1997 - The National Directory of Geoscience Data Repositories, edited by Nicholas H. Claudy – American Geologic Institute. To prepare the directory, questionnaires were mailed to state geologists, more than 60 geological societies, private-sector data centers selected from oil and gas directories, and to the membership committee of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, one of AGI's member societies. The directory contains 124 repository listings, organized alphabetically by state. 2002 – National Research Council 2002. Geoscience Data and Collections: National resources in Peril. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press 2005 – The National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program (NGGDPP) of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) was established by The Energy Policy Act of 2005, and reauthorized in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, “to preserve and expose the Nation’s geoscience collections (samples, logs, maps, data) to promote their discovery and use for research and resource development”. The Program provides “technical and financial assistance to state geological

Overview This directory was developed to provide discovery information for anyone looking for publicly accessible repositories that house geological materials in the U.S. and Canada. In addition, this resource is intended to be a tool to facilitate a community of practice. The need for the directory was identified during planning for and follow-up from a drill core repository webinar series in Spring 2020 for public repository curators and staff in the U.S. and Canada hosted by the Minnesota Geological Survey and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Additional supporting sponsors included the U.S. Geological Survey National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program and the Association of American State Geologists Data Preservation Committee. The 10-part webinar series provided overviews of state, provincial, territorial, and national repositories that house drill core, other geoscience materials, and data. When the series concluded a small working group of the participants continued to meet to facilitate the development and production of a directory of repositories that maintain publicly-accessible geological materials throughout the U.S. and Canada. The group used previous directory efforts described in the next section, Summary of Historical Repository Directory Compilation Efforts, as guides for content during development. The working group prepared and compiled responses from a call for repository information and characterization. This directory is planned to be a living resource for the geoscience community with updates every other year to accommodate changes. The updates will facilitated through versioned updates of this data release. Summary of Historical Repository Directory Compilation Efforts 1957 – Sample and Core Repositories of the United States, Alaska, and Canada. Published by AAPG. Committee on Preservation of Samples and Cores. 13 members from industry, academia, and government. 1977 – Well-Sample and Core Repositories of the Unites States and Canada, C.K. Fisher; M.P. Krupa, USGS Open file report 77-567.USGS wanted to update the original index. Includes a map showing core repositories by “State” “University” “Commercial” and “Federal”. Also includes a “Brief Statement of Requirements for the Preservation of Subsurface Material and Data” and referral to state regulations for details on preserved materials. 1984 - Nonprofit Sample and Core Repositories Open to the Public in the United States – USGS Circular 942. James Schmoker, Thomas Michalski, Patricia Worl. The survey was conducted by a questionnaire mailed to repository curators. Information on additions, corrections, and deletions to earlier (1957,1977) directories from state geologists, each state office of the Water Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey, additional government agencies and colleagues were also used. 1997 - The National Directory of Geoscience Data Repositories, edited by Nicholas H. Claudy – American Geologic Institute. To prepare the directory, questionnaires were mailed to state geologists, more than 60 geological societies, private-sector data centers selected from oil and gas directories, and to the membership committee of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, one of AGI's member societies. The directory contains 124 repository listings, organized alphabetically by state. 2002 – National Research Council 2002. Geoscience Data and Collections: National resources in Peril. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press 2005 – The National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program (NGGDPP) of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) was established by The Energy Policy Act of 2005, and reauthorized in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, “to preserve and expose the Nation’s geoscience collections (samples, logs, maps, data) to promote their discovery and use for research and resource development”. The Program provides “technical and financial assistance to state geological

,

,

These geospatial data and their accompanying report outline many areas of coal in the United States beneath more than 3,000 ft of overburden. Based on depth, these areas may be targets for injection and storage of supercritical carbon dioxide. Additional areas where coal exists beneath more than 1,000 ft of overburden are also outlined; these may be targets for geologic storage of carbon dioxide in conjunction with enhanced coalbed methane production. These areas of deep coal were compiled as polygons into a shapefile for use in a geographic information system (GIS). The coal-bearing formation names, coal basin or field names, geographic provinces, coal ranks, coal geologic ages, and estimated individual coalbed thicknesses (if known) of the coal-bearing formations were included. An additional point shapefile, coal_co2_projects.shp, contains the locations of pilot projects for carbon dioxide injection into coalbeds. This report is not a comprehensive study of deep coal in the United States. Some areas of deep coal were excluded based on geologic or data-quality criteria, while others may be absent from the literature and still others may have been overlooked by the authors.

This U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data release contains data from stream water, groundwater/springs, and sediment samples collected from legacy mine land (LML) sites in central Colorado. The sites were selected using a GIS-based approach that integrated regional geological and geochemical datasets with known mine features and satellite data identifying hydrothermal alteration (ASTER) to identify LML-impacted watersheds with low natural background or metal concentrations slightly above aquatic life standards. The central Colorado watersheds selected for preliminary investigation included 1) McNasser Gulch, 2) upper South Fork Lake Creek, 3) Saints John Creek, and 4) Hall Valley (north fork of South Platte River). Reconnaissance sampling of surface water, groundwater, and sediment (August 2019) to identify sources of trace element contamination in each watershed. Follow-up sampling in the Hall Valley watershed (August 2020) provided flow and concentration data for the four largest surface inflows to a headwater pond and additional locations below the pond outlet. Metal loads at these locations were calculated as the product of flow and concentration.

Stable isotope analyses are reported (the ratios deuterium/hydrogen, carbon-13/carbon-12, oxygen-18/oxygen-16, and sulfur-34/sulfur-32) for ores and related rocks from the Pea Ridge, Lower Pilot Knob, Bourbon, Iron Mountain, and Kratz Spring iron oxide-apatite deposits in southeast Missouri; the Boss iron oxide-copper-gold deposit in southeast Missouri; the Gagaryah stratiform barite deposit in Alaska; the Canyon, Hack II, and Pigeon breccia pipe uranium deposits in Arizona; the Grasberg porphyry copper-gold deposit in Indonesia; metalliferous occurrences in the Castro Basin, southern Brazil; and the White Mountain gold deposit, Jilin Province, China.

Stable isotope analyses are reported (the ratios deuterium/hydrogen, carbon-13/carbon-12, oxygen-18/oxygen-16, and sulfur-34/sulfur-32) for ores and related rocks from the Pea Ridge, Lower Pilot Knob, Bourbon, Iron Mountain, and Kratz Spring iron oxide-apatite deposits in southeast Missouri; the Boss iron oxide-copper-gold deposit in southeast Missouri; the Gagaryah stratiform barite deposit in Alaska; the Canyon, Hack II, and Pigeon breccia pipe uranium deposits in Arizona; the Grasberg porphyry copper-gold deposit in Indonesia; metalliferous occurrences in the Castro Basin, southern Brazil; and the White Mountain gold deposit, Jilin Province, China.

Sediment hosted gold deposits in Nevada were first mined in the 1960s from open pit mines with large tonnage and low grade resources. Since that time, continuing exploration and discovery have identified extraordinary resources, and together these deposits now form the second-largest gold endowment on Earth, surpassed only by the Witwatersrand Gold Fields of South Africa. The data herein are part of a larger U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) project to develop an updated geospatial database of mines, mineral deposits and mineral regions in the United States. The point and polygon layers within this database represent locations of mines, mineral occurrences (which includes deposits and prospects), and mining districts in an approximately 200-square mile area northwest of Carlin, Nevada. Tables contain additional information such as commodity, geology, deposit types, activity status, deposit resources, and mine production. The extent of surface workings, when visible on imagery, is also captured and shows the relative size of mining operations. All data were compiled from publicly available sources published from 1910 - 2017. Where possible, data were compiled from primary source reports rather than from syntheses of past reports. Although the selected area does not include the entire Carlin Trend, the area, which covers nine 7.5-minute quadrangles, does contain a wide range of deposit types described through a variety of public data and information. These data are being compiled by the USGS Mineral Deposit Database project with support from the Bureau of Land Management.

The dataset comprises analyses of core and surface samples collected in and around the Red Mountain porphyry Cu-Mo deposit, Santa Cruz County, Arizona. The dataset includes: analyses for 13 minerals in 245 core samples (Appendix 1); analyses for 44 elements in 818 core samples (Appendix 2); analyses for 54 elements in 122 rock samples (Appendix 3); analyses for 55 elements in 119 soil samples (Appendix 4); and analyses for percent ash and 66 elements in 57 mesquite ash (Appendix 5), 68 oak ash (Appendix 6), and 68 juniper ash (Appendix 7) samples, respectively. The samples were collected and analyzed between 1980 and 2000.