,This is a line dataset that delineates the extent of State Water Project repayment reaches. The locations of the repayment reaches were derived from DWR records. Additional information from the DWR Blue Book has been included. The Blue Book mileposts are included for informational purposes and are not the controlling authority of the true extent of the repayment reaches.,This dataset is current as of 3/20/2024.,

,This is a line dataset that delineates the extent of State Water Project construction divisions. The locations of the construction divisions were derived from DWR records.,This dataset is current as of 3/20/2024.,

,This is a line dataset that delineates the extent of State Water Project construction divisions. The locations of the construction divisions were derived from DWR records.,This dataset is current as of 3/20/2024.,

,

This data depicts California Proposition 1 Funding Area boundaries as defined by Water Code §79744, which states, "(a) Of the funds authorized by Section 79740, five hundred ten million dollars ($510,000,000) shall be allocated to the hydrologic regions as identified in the California Water Plan in accordance with this section. For the South Coast hydrologic region, the department shall establish three funding areas that reflect the watersheds of San Diego County and southern Orange County (designated as the San Diego subregion), the Santa Ana River watershed (designated as the Santa Ana subregion), and the Los Angeles and Ventura County watersheds (designated as the Los Angeles subregion), and shall allocate funds to those areas in accordance with this subdivision. The North and South Lahontan hydrologic regions shall be treated as one area for the purpose of allocating funds. For purposes of this subdivision, the Sacramento River hydrologic region does not include the Delta. For purposes of this subdivision, the Mountain Counties Overlay is not eligible for funds from the Sacramento River hydrologic region or the San Joaquin River hydrologic region. Multiple integrated regional water management plans may be recognized in each of the areas allocated funding." Key differences between the old and new P1 FAs data set (original/proposed data set, respectively): 1. Line-work along the coastline formerly excluded much detail (bays, inlets, piers, lagoons, etc.); the new proposed dataset more closely follows the i03_Hydrologic_Regions data set. Hence, this data set includes more line detail along the coastline. 2. Line-work forming the P1 FAs between the Southwest portion of the San Joaquin River funding area and Northwest portion of the Tulare/Kern funding area was inconsistent between the two data sets. This data set corrects this notable discrepancy.

This centerline has a multitude of potential uses for project tracking and spatial analysis. It is suitable for use as the base for a linear referencing system to record information about the State Water Project canal system, as a component of a hydrologic model, or simply as a cartographic element on both small and large scale maps. Canal centerlines were derived from the data in i17_StateWaterProject_Basemap. Pipeline and reservoir centerlines were copied from i17_StateWaterProject_Lines. The associated data are considered DWR enterprise GIS data, which meet all appropriate requirements of the DWR Spatial Data Standards, specifically the DWR Spatial Data Standard version 2.1, dated March 9, 2016. DWR makes no warranties or guarantees —either expressed or implied — as to the completeness, accuracy, or correctness of the data. DWR neither accepts nor assumes liability arising from or for any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading subject data.

The purpose of this feature class is to delineate an approximate centerline for the State Water Project canals.,

Water Plan Planning Areas as part of the detailed Analysis’s Units (DAU) dataset. DAU boundaries match Cal-Fire dataset “cnty24k09_1_poly”.

This polygon feature class is a data set compiled by DWR employees in 2013 and represents the statewide Groundwater Management Plan (Plan) boundaries predating the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) requirements. Each polygon represents the area in which a Plan is to be implemented. The boundaries were provided to DWR by the affiliated public agency and compiled into a single statewide data set. Spatial plan boundaries were provided by agencies to DWR either via shapefiles or PDFs. PDFs were georeferenced and turned into GIS layers by DWR employees.This feature class is for legacy purposes only and will not be changed nor updated. It needs to be memorialized for spatial coverage of Groundwater Management Plans prior to SGMA and because SGMA only requires medium and high priority basins to have a Groundwater Sustainability Plan. The Plans outlined in this shapefile by medium and high priority basins are in effect until SGMA goes into effect. Some low and very low priority basins will likely use the existing plans to get funding for future basin management (since it is only voluntary for them to provide a Plan under SGMA, but they already have one in place). The data set is considered complete because of its legacy status. However, anyone using the data set will notice boundary inconsistencies, agency plan overlaps, mismatches, and other topology errors. The data set is based on boundary estimations and in the cases of medium and high priority basins will be outdated with in implementation of SGMA. Pre-SGMA Statewide Groundwater Management Plans based on legislative actions: AB3030 (signed into law in 1992), SB 1938 (signed into law in 2002), and AB 359 (signed into law in 2011). For Groundwater Management Plan documents please email SGMPS@water.ca.gov.There are no access nor distribution constraints.There will be no resource maintenance nor update frequency.

,Description for i03_DAU_county_cnty2018 is as follows:,,Detailed Analysis Unit-(DAU) Convergence via County Boundary cnty18_1 for Cal-Fire, (*See metadata for CAL-FIRE cnty18_1), State of California.,,The existing DAU boundaries were aligned with cnty18_1 feature class.,,Originally a collaboration by Department of Water Resources, Region Office personnel, Michael L. Serna, NRO, Jason Harbaugh - NCRO, Cynthia Moffett - SCRO and Robert Fastenau - SRO with the final merge of all data into a cohesive feature class to create i03_DAU_COUNTY_cnty24k09 alignment which has been updated to create i03_DAU_COUNTY_cnty18_1.,,This version was derived from a preexisting “dau_v2_105, 27, i03_DAU_COUNTY_cnty24k09” Detailed Analysis Unit feature class's and aligned with Cal-Fire's 2018 boundary.,,Manmade structures such as piers and breakers, small islands and coastal rocks have been removed from this version. Inlets waters are listed on the coast only.,,These features are reachable by County\DAU. This allows the county boundaries, the DAU boundaries and the State of California Boundary to match Cal-Fire cnty18_1.,,DAU Background,,The first investigation of California's water resources began in 1873 when President Ulysses S. Grant commissioned an investigation by Colonel B. S. Alexander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The state followed with its own study in 1878 when the State Engineer's office was created and filled by William Hammond Hall. The concept of a statewide water development project was first raised in 1919 by Lt. Robert B. Marshall of the U.S. Geological Survey.,,In 1931, State Engineer Edward Hyatt introduced a report identifying the facilities required and the economic means to accomplish a north-to-south water transfer. Called the "State Water Plan", the report took nine years to prepare. To implement the plan, the Legislature passed the Central Valley Act of 1933, which authorized the project. Due to lack of funds, the federal government took over the CVP as a public works project to provide jobs and its construction began in 1935.,,In 1945, the California Legislature authorized an investigation of statewide water resources and in 1947, the California Legislature requested that an investigation be conducted of the water resources as well as present and future water needs for all hydrologic regions in the State. Accordingly, DWR and its predecessor agencies began to collect the urban and agricultural land use and water use data that serve as the basis for the computations of current and projected water uses.,,The work, conducted by the Division of Water Resources (DWR’s predecessor) under the Department of Public Works, led to the publication of three important bulletins: Bulletin 1 (1951), "Water Resources of California," a collection of data on precipitation, unimpaired stream flows, flood flows and frequency, and water quality statewide; Bulletin 2 (1955), "Water Utilization and Requirements of California," estimates of water uses and forecasts of "ultimate" water needs; and Bulletin 3 (1957), "The California Water Plan," plans for full practical development of California’s water resources, both by local projects and a major State project to meet the State's ultimate needs. (**See brief addendum below** “The Development of Boundaries for Hydrologic Studies for the Sacramento Valley Region”),,DWR subdivided California into study areas for planning purposes. The largest study areas are the ten hydrologic regions (HR), corresponding to the State’s major drainage basins. The next levels of delineation are the Planning Areas (PA), which in turn are composed of multiple detailed analysis units (DAU). The DAUs are often split by county boundaries, so are the smallest study areas used by DWR.,,The DAU/counties are used for estimating water demand by agricultural crops and other surfaces for water resources planning. Under current guidelines, each DAU/County has multiple crop and land-use categories. Many planning studies begin