This dataset contains an accounting of the number of missions who have an approved Country Development Cooperation Strategy (CDCS) in the period 2010-2016, a part of the USAID Forward reform initiative that ran from 2010-2016. USAID Forward improved the way that the Agency delivers foreign assistance by embracing new partnerships, investing in the catalytic role of innovation, and demanding a renewed focus on results. In 2017, the Agency determined that the work advanced under USAID Forward had largely been institutionalized. On this site, you will find the FY 2012-2016 data related to USAID Forward's three main areas of focus: 1) Deliver results on a meaningful scale through a strengthened USAID, 2) Promote sustainable development through high-impact partnerships and local solutions, and 3) Identify and scale up innovative, breakthrough solutions to intractable development challenges. As of October 2017, we are no longer updating information, including collecting indicators, on this legacy effort.

This dataset contains the proportion of staff work plans with at least one direct engagement performance measure during the period 2010-2016, a part of the USAID Forward reform initiative that ran from 2010-2016. USAID Forward improved the way that the Agency delivers foreign assistance by embracing new partnerships, investing in the catalytic role of innovation, and demanding a renewed focus on results. In 2017, the Agency determined that the work advanced under USAID Forward had largely been institutionalized. On this site, you will find the FY 2012-2016 data related to USAID Forward's three main areas of focus: 1) Deliver results on a meaningful scale through a strengthened USAID, 2) Promote sustainable development through high-impact partnerships and local solutions, and 3) Identify and scale up innovative, breakthrough solutions to intractable development challenges. As of October 2017, we are no longer updating information, including collecting indicators, on this legacy effort.

This dataset contains the value of public-private partnerships with a minimum of 1:1 leverage during the period 2010-2016, a part of the USAID Forward reform initiative that ran from 2010-2016. USAID Forward improved the way that the Agency delivers foreign assistance by embracing new partnerships, investing in the catalytic role of innovation, and demanding a renewed focus on results. In 2017, the Agency determined that the work advanced under USAID Forward had largely been institutionalized. On this site, you will find the FY 2012-2016 data related to USAID Forward's three main areas of focus: 1) Deliver results on a meaningful scale through a strengthened USAID, 2) Promote sustainable development through high-impact partnerships and local solutions, and 3) Identify and scale up innovative, breakthrough solutions to intractable development challenges. As of October 2017, we are no longer updating information, including collecting indicators, on this legacy effort.

This dataset contains the number of USAID missions supporting mobile money initiatives during 2010-2016, a part of the USAID Forward reform initiative that ran from 2010-2016. USAID Forward improved the way that the Agency delivers foreign assistance by embracing new partnerships, investing in the catalytic role of innovation, and demanding a renewed focus on results. In 2017, the Agency determined that the work advanced under USAID Forward had largely been institutionalized. On this site, you will find the FY 2012-2016 data related to USAID Forward's three main areas of focus: 1) Deliver results on a meaningful scale through a strengthened USAID, 2) Promote sustainable development through high-impact partnerships and local solutions, and 3) Identify and scale up innovative, breakthrough solutions to intractable development challenges. As of October 2017, we are no longer updating information, including collecting indicators, on this legacy effort.

This dataset contains the percent of program funds leveraging private capital through the DCA during the period 2010-2016, a part of the USAID Forward reform initiative that ran from 2010-2016. USAID Forward improved the way that the Agency delivers foreign assistance by embracing new partnerships, investing in the catalytic role of innovation, and demanding a renewed focus on results. In 2017, the Agency determined that the work advanced under USAID Forward had largely been institutionalized. On this site, you will find the FY 2012-2016 data related to USAID Forward's three main areas of focus: 1) Deliver results on a meaningful scale through a strengthened USAID, 2) Promote sustainable development through high-impact partnerships and local solutions, and 3) Identify and scale up innovative, breakthrough solutions to intractable development challenges. As of October 2017, we are no longer updating information, including collecting indicators, on this legacy effort.

The USAID Forward reform initiative ran from 2010-2016. USAID Forward improved the way that the Agency delivers foreign assistance by embracing new partnerships, investing in the catalytic role of innovation, and demanding a renewed focus on results. In 2017, the Agency determined that the work advanced under USAID Forward had largely been institutionalized. On this site, you will find the FY 2012-2016 data related to USAID Forward's three main areas of focus: 1) Deliver results on a meaningful scale through a strengthened USAID, 2) Promote sustainable development through high-impact partnerships and local solutions, and 3) Identify and scale up innovative, breakthrough solutions to intractable development challenges. As of October 2017, we are no longer updating information, including collecting indicators, on this legacy effort.

The United States Agency for International Development's (USAID) Bureau for Policy, Planning, and Learning's Office of Learning, Evaluation, and Research (PPL/LER) commissioned this study to help USAID determine the extent to which its evaluations are being used and what guidance, tools, or Agency practices might be improved to enhance evaluation utilization. The data was compiled as part of the Evaluation Utilization Study completed in February 2016. The study was informed by three primary data sources: document review, survey research and interviews. Evaluation use was evident at several stages in the USAID Program Cycle. At the country level, 59 percent of approved strategies were found to have referenced USAID evaluations and 71 percent of evaluations were used to support and/or modify a USAID project or activity. The most common changes found were actions that refocus ongoing activities, including revisions to delivery mechanism work plans, extending activity timelines or expanding activity geographic areas. The study team concluded that USAID evaluation utilization practices are already strong and compare well to those of other US Government agencies examined in previous studies by the US Government Accountability Office.

Each row includes data about agency ODP progress reporting.

Each row includes data about agency ODP progress reporting.

Year In Review page summarized the progress of Open Data project.