,This dataset is associated with the forthcoming publication entitled, "Microbial volatile organic compounds mediate attraction by a primary but not secondary stored product insect pest in wheat", and includes data on grain damage from near infrared spectroscopy, behavioral data from wind tunnel and release-recapture experiments, as well as volatile characterization of headspace from moldy grain. For all files, incubation intervals 9, 18, and 27 d represent how long grain was incubated after being tempered to a grain moisture of 12, 15, or 19% or left untempered (ctrl; 10.8% grain moisture). TSO = Trece storgard oil; empty = negative control (no stimulus), LGB = lesser grain borer (Rhzyopertha dominica), and RFB = red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum).,Note: The resource 'GC/MS Grain MVOC Headspace Data' was added 2021-08-04 with the deletion of some compounds as unlikely natural compounds and potential contaminants. This is the dataset that undergirds the non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis.,See the included file list for more information about methods and results of each file in this dataset.,,

,Our goals were to 1) isolate, and culture two fungal morphotypes, 2) characterize the volatile emissions from grain inoculated by each fungal morphotype (Aspergillus flavus or Fusarium spp.) compared to uninoculated and sanitized grain, and 3) understand how MVOCs from each morphotype affects mobility, attraction, and preference by L. serricorne. Headspace collection revealed that the Fusarium- and A. flavus-inoculated grain produced significantly different volatiles compared to sanitized grain or the positive control. Changes in MVOC emissions affected close-range foraging during an Ethovision assay, with a greater frequency of entering and spending time in a small zone with kernels inoculated with A. flavus compared to other treatments. In the release-recapture assay, MVOCs were found to be attractive to L. serricorne at a longer distances in commercial pitfall traps. While there was no preference shown among semiochemical stimuli in a still-air, four-way olfactometer, it is possible that methodological limitations prevented robust interpretation from this assay. Overall, our study suggests that MVOCs are important for close- and long-range orientation of L.serricorne during foraging, and that MVOCs may have the potential for inclusion in behaviorally-based tactics for this species.,

,Behavioral data for eight strains of red flour beetles in three behavioral assays and two commercial lures.,The red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), is a major pest of facilities where grain is processed because of its ability to find and colonize food resource patches. Traps baited with pheromone and kairomone lures are commonly used to monitor for the presence of insects in warehouses or flour mills, for example. However, two nonmutually exclusive components, environment and genetics, could influence insect responsiveness to volatiles, impacting the efficacy of monitoring. Intraspecific variation in attraction behavior to food and mates is largely unexplored in stored-product insects, but tapping into natural genetic variation could provide a baseline for identifying genetic mechanisms associated with finding resources. Here, we assess eight strains of T. castaneum for variation in response to kairomone- and pheromone-based lures using three behavioral assays: paired choice with no forced air flow, upwind attraction with forced air flow, and movement pattern in an arena with a single odor source. We find strain-specific responses to kairomones and pheromones and evidence for heritability in behavioral responses. However, environmental coefficients for behavioral responses to both lures are high, suggesting that environment, and its potential interaction with genotype, strongly influences behavioral outcomes in these assays. Furthermore, despite the different environmental conditions among the different behavioral assays, we find a correlation for volatile preference among the assays. Our results provide a baseline assessment of natural variation for preference to kairomone and pheromone lures and suggest that careful consideration of behavioral assay is key to understanding the mechanisms of attraction in these stored-product pests.,,

,Insects,Beetles used in this study were obtained from stock colonies maintained at the USDA Agricultural Research Service’s (ARS) Center for Grain and Animal Health Research (CGAHR) in Manhattan, KS, USA. Colonies of R. dominica and S. oryzae were reared on organic whole wheat kernels that had been tempered to 15% grain moisture. To subculture, a total of 50 adult individuals were placed on 200 mL of grain in a mason jar (capacity: 473 mL) and given 14 d to mate and lay eggs. At the end of that period, adult hosts were removed by sieving with a #10 sieve (2.00 mm; W.S Tyler Inc., Mentor, Ohio), and colonies were allowed to age for 3-weeks prior to using beetles as hosts for parasitoid rearing. Theocolax elegans were maintained separately on two different hosts, either R. dominica or S. oryzae for at least three full generations. Freshly emerged, healthy T. elegans were used for the experiments below. All colonies of parasitoids were maintained in a separate environmental chamber than host-only colonies to prevent cross-contamination. Colonies were maintained in mason jars and stored in an environmental chamber under constant conditions (27.5°C, 60% RH, 14:10 L:D).,Interactions with Predators,Laboratory studies were performed in 2022 and 2023 at the USDA Center for Grain and Animal Health Research (Manhattan, KS, USA). From July–October of each year, predators were collected weekly from local post-harvest food facilities, including the Kansas State Agronomy Farm (GPS: 39.2062227, -96.5951959), where S. oryzae and other stored product pests are abundantly found (Morrison et al. 2025[1] ). Most predators used in trials were collected by sweep netting (Bioquip Products, Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA) sampling vegetation adjacent to grain bins or by hand collection and held temporarily in 1-gal (=3.98 L) Ziplocks, then immediately brought back to the lab in a cooler on insulated ice packs. In the lab, insects were processed by individually placing predators into a 950-mL mason jar with 10 S. oryzae from colonies. The predators were identified to family (Marshall 2006, Paquin et al. 2017). Mason jars with predators and S. oryzae were then placed on shelves in an environmental chamber set to constant conditions (27.5°C, 60% RH, 14:10 L:D). After 24 h, the jars were checked, and the number of S. oryzae consumed was recorded as well as the presence of any self-aggregation behavior of S. oryzae together and away from the predator, which was taken to be evidence for non-consumptive effects in the presence of the predator. The results of predators were only included when there were n = 3 or greater number of replicates.,Ethovision,Video-tracking coupled with Ethovision software v.14.0 (Noldus, Inc., Leesburg, VA: Noldus et al. 2002) was used to investigate the impact of natural enemy kairomones on the mobility and orientation of R. dominica and S. oryzae over short distances. This system has previously been used for analyzing the mobility and foraging behaviors of stored product insects (Wilkins et al. 2020; Ponce et al. 2022). Six arenas consisting of Petri dishes (VWR Petri dishes, 100 × 15 mm) with an 85-mm filter paper (Grade 1, Whatman, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) adhered to the bottom using double-sided sticky tape were arranged 80 cm below a network video camera (GigE, Basler AG, Ahrensburg, Germany). The movement of individual insects within each arena was simultaneously recorded on an adjacent computer. Four zones were monitored in Ethovision, including the two halves of the Petri dish (i.e. treatment half vs control half) and two 1 cm diameter zones nested in the middle of each half where stimuli were applied (treatment stimulus zone and control stimulus zone). The position of treatments was randomized between replicates and a total of n = 12 replicate assays were conducted for each treatment. For each assay, a single insect was introduced into the center of an arena and its movement was tracked for a total of 10 min. Several

,Trapping in 2023 with a linear set of dosages of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate,Field trapping was done according to the methodology in Ruiz et al. 2022. The fields were located in North-Central Kansas at the Land Institute near Salina, KS. No pesticides were applied to these fields during the experiment in 2023. Starting the first week of June, six transects were set out, two in each Silphium integrifolium field. Each transect contained seven 30.4 cm x 30.4 cm sticky card traps (Alpha Scents, Canby, OR, USA) affixed to the top of a 1.27 cm diameter, three foot in length PVC pole that was hammered into the ground until sturdy. The cards were affixed using a 271 cm long sticky card ring holder (Olson Products Inc., Medina, OH, USA) that was bent to a 90° angle and placed inside the PVC pipe. Two large binder clips were also used to anchor the sticky card to its card holder.,The sticky traps in each transect were spaced 10 meters apart around the perimeter of the field. Within each transect, traps were baited with a linear increase in concentrations in 2023, including either a control (50 µl of acetone), a low concentration (50 µl of a solution made by mixing 5.75 µl of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate in 5 ml of acetone), or a doubled concentration (11.5 µl of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone) of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate (Alfa Chemistry, Ronkonkoma, NY, USA). All lures were added to a 3-ml LDPE dropping bottle (Wheaton, DWK Life Sciences, Millville, NJ, USA). The clear sticky card traps were collected and replaced biweekly until the first E. giganteana adult was caught, then traps were changed weekly. The lures and control bottles were replaced once every two weeks (with lure emissions confirmed out to 14 d in Ruiz et al. 2022) and their position in the field rotated at each change. Each lure was in each position twice over the course of the season.,When collected, the sticky cards were held in a 7.6 L (=2 gal) labeled Ziploc© bag transported back to USDA-ARS. All collected sticky traps were placed in a freezer for approximately 24 h. The total number of E. giganteana per trap and their distance from the lure in millimeters was recorded. In addition, the number of nontarget lepidoptera was recorded on each trap. Individual E. giganteana and non-target lepidoptera were only counted if more than half of the specimen was remaining on the sticky trap at the time of counting to ensure positive identification.,Trapping in 2024 with an exponential set of concentrations of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate,Field trapping in 2024 was conducted similarly to that in 2023 with the following modifications. Three different fields located at the Land Institute were used (Table 1). [HS1] Pesticides were applied once to one of the fields and adjacent to one of the others. Three transects were deployed in each of the three fields. Each transect contained four traps for a total of 36 traps. The traps were assembled similarly to those used in 2023, but a hand-made sticky card was used instead of a manufactured one to improve captures. These sticky cards were made of a laminated 21.6 × 27.9 cm (=8.5 by 11 in) piece of white cardstock paper (Astrobright, Neenah, WI, USA) coated on both sides with TADⓇ all-weather adhesive (Trécé Adhesives Division, Adair, OK, USA). The sticky sides were covered with wax paper for ease of travel. Additionally, the sticky cards had a chicken wire cage placed over them in the field to try to prevent the capture of birds and other nontargets on the traps. Traps in 2024 were baited with an exponential set of concentrations of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate. In each transect, there was a solvent only control (50 µl of acetone), a low concentration equivalent to the 2023 treatment (50 µl of a solution made of 5.75 µl of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone), a medium concentration (50 µl of a solution made of 78.5 µl of (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate diluted in 5 ml of acetone), and a high concentration (50 µl of a solution made

,Meta-data from over 100 studies that examined induction of plant phenolic compounds following colonization by insects or microbial organisms (both pathogens and beneficials). This meta-data was used in a meta-analysis to observe that both insects and microbes consistently induce phenolic production. The meta-data covers publications that range from 2008 to 2017.,,

,Insect Strains and Rearing: Two field-derived strains of T. castaneum from either Eastern Kansas, collected in 2012, or Riley County, KS, collected in 2019, were used to assess the effect of strain on the behavioral response to necromones. Except where noted, the 2012 field strain was used for each experiment. T. castaneum was reared on a mixture of 95% unbleached flour and 5% brewer’s yeast in an environmental chamber at 27.5ºC, 60% RH, and 14:10 L:D. Subculturing proceeded by adding 75 mixed-sex T. castaneum to a 947-ml mason jar filled two-thirds with mixed diet. Adults were removed after 72 h of oviposition. Mixed sex adults aged 4–8 weeks old were used in all assays. All experiments were performed between the years 2017–2020.,Treatments:,Time of Death of Prior Captures on Behavioral Response: For investigating the attraction to kairomone oil based on how long beetles were left in the oil, the following treatments were included: negative control (neg ctrl), 950μL of Trécé Storgard® Kairomone Oil (kairomone oil for the remainder of the manuscript; Adair, OK, USA) only, or 950 μL of kairomone oil plus 25 freshly killed, mixed sex T. castaneum adults aged in the oil for 1, 25, 48, 72, or 96 h. A second round of the beetles aged longer than 8 days was included with the following treatments: negative control (neg ctrl), 950μL of kairomone oil only, or 950 μL of kairomone oil plus 25 freshly killed, mixed sex T. castaneum adults aged in the oil for 8, 9, 10, or 11 d (Table 1). These experiments were performed in a combination of the wind tunnel, release-recapture assay, and two-choice olfactometer (Table 1). Treatments were added to 20 mL GC headspace vials (Gerstel, GmBH, Germany) for wind tunnel assays, while they were added to Trécé Storgard™ Dome® traps in the release-recapture assays.,Influence of Density of Prior Captures on Behavioral Response: In order to evaluate whether the behavioral response of T. castaneum modulates with different densities of conspecifics in traps, the following treatments for the density response study were used: the same negative control, 950 μl of kairomone oil only, or 950 μl of kairomone oil plus either 4, 10, 20, or 40 mixed sex T. castaneum adults that were allowed to incubate for 24 h or 96 h. These experiments were performed in a combination of the wind tunnel, release-recapture assay, and headspace collection/GC-MS (Table 1). Treatments were added to 20 mL GC headspace vials (Gerstel, GmBH, Germany) for wind tunnel assays, while they were added to Trécé Storgard™ Dome® traps in the release-recapture assays.,Effect of Strain on Behavioral Response to Prior Captures: To rule out losing the attraction behaviors from laboratory-rearing protocols, a more recent T. castaneum strain was used and tested against the strain from Eastern Kansas collected in 2012. Thus, both a 2012 and 2019 field-collected (from Riley Co., Kansas) population of T. castaneum were tested in these experiments. The treatments for the strain effect consisted of a negative control, kairomone oil only, and 950 μl of kairomone oil plus either 4, 10, 20, or 40 mixed sex T. castaneum adults, which were allowed to incubate for 24 h. Both strains were tested in the wind tunnel and a release-recapture assay (Table 1).,Effect of Rancidity on Behavioral Response to Prior Captures: We conducted an experiment to test if long-term storage of the kairomone oil may have caused it to become rancid, despite being stored at 4ºC as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Treatments included: 950 μl of the kairomone oil we have used for most of our other experiments (e.g., standard Storgard® kairomone oil, or SSO) only, Storgard® kairomone oil borrowed from a colleague at the Center for Grain and Animal Health Research (CGAHR) (e.g., BSO), corn oil purchased freshly from the market (e.g., CO), or one of each of these treatments + 25 dead T. castaneum (Table 1). Attraction behavior was assessed in the wind tunnel.,Assay Methods:,Wind Tunnel

,The aim of the current study was to track the movement of phosphine-resistant and -susceptible adults of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), which is a major pest of stored products, after brief exposures to phosphine. Exposures were followed for extended intervals to assess the recovery patterns, and how those patterns are related to known resistance to phosphine. A video-tracking procedure coupled with Ethovision software was used to assess movement after exposure.,Two strains of T. castaneum were used, one susceptible and one resistant to phosphine. The susceptible T. castaneum strain had been maintained in continuous culture without any known exposure to phosphine for >30 years at the USDA-ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health Research (CGAHR), in Manhattan, KS, USA. The phosphine-resistant strain of T. castaneum was collected from wheat in Palmital, Brazil during 1988 (BRZ-5). The rearing media consisted of 95% organic, unbleached, wheat flour plus 5% brewer's yeast. Tribolium castaneum were reared under laboratory conditions of 27.5°C, and 65% relative humidity (R.H.), 14:10 L:D. Adults, of mixed sex and <1 month old, were used in the exposure bioassays.,The protocol that was used in our bioassays to generate phosphine was the Phosphine Tolerance Test (Detia Degesch GmbH, Laudenbach, Germany) with some modifications, as performed by Agrafioti et al. 2021. In particular, the phosphine was generated within a plastic canister (5 L capacity) by adding 50 mL of water to two kit magnesium phosphide pellets. The concentration of phosphine gas inside the plastic canister was determined by using several dosimeter Draeger glass tubes (Draeger 25A, 0–10 000 ppm, Draeger Safety AG & Co., USA). Ten adults of each strain were placed in a plastic syringe of 100 mL with separate syringes used for each species and strain. Then, a specific gas quantity was removed from the canister with the syringe and blended with fresh air to produce a 100-mL volume with a concentration of either 1000 or 3000 ppm and compared to phosphine-free controls (0 ppm). The insects inside the syringe were held at the concentrations above for a 5 min exposure, while additional syringes containing only fresh air and insects were used as negative controls.,To understand the propensity for movement after a 5 min phosphine exposure, a video-tracking procedure was used. After exposure of phosphine-resistant or phosphine-susceptible T. castaneum for 5 min, adult movement was evaluated immediately after exposure or 24 h later under the same environmental chamber conditions as the colonies (see Source Insects), but held without supplemental food. Movement was recorded for 3 h immediately after phosphine exposure but binned into 30 min intervals (e.g., 0–30, 30–60, 60–120, 120–150, and 150–180 min) in order to evaluate how movement varied over the measured time period. Movement was also recorded 24 h after exposure for periods of 1 h (binned by 30 min intervals). Movement measures of adults was tracked in six replicate Petri dishes (90 × 15 mm D:H) with a piece of filter paper (85 mm D, Grade 1, GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) lining the bottom using a network camera (GigE, Basler AG, Ahrenburg, Germany) affixed 80 cm above the dishes. The Petri dishes were backlit using a LED light box (42 × 30 cm W:L, LPB3, Litup, Shenzhen, China) to increase contrast and affixed in place with white foam board with holes specifically cut to size for the petri dishes. Video was streamed to a nearby computer and processed in Ethovision (v. 14.0.1322, Noldus Inc., Leesburg, VA). The software was used to calculate the total distance moved (cm) and the mean instantaneous velocity (cm/s) for each adult. Each adult was considered a replicate and was never used more than once. Only adults classified as alive (normal movement speed and activity), or affected (sluggish movements or on back with legs twitching) were used in this assay.

,Description: This dataset consists of field data (arthropods, nematodes and NDVI) collected over the course of 6 field excursions in 2015 and 2016 near TyTy, GA, in a field used for growing Miscanthus x giganteus. It also includes interpolated values of soil measurements collected in 2015 and meteorological data collected on an adjacent farm. Point-in-time measurements include all meteorological, NDVI, arthropod and nematode measurements and their derivatives. Fixed values were measurements that were held constant across all sampling dates, including location, terrain and soils measurements and their derivatives.,Dawn Olson and Jason Schmidt collected and processed arthropod count data. Jason Schmidt collected and processed spider count data and computed spider diversity. Richard Davis collected and processed nematode count data. Alisa Coffin collected and processed NDVI data and positional locations. Tim Strickland collected and processed soils data and Alisa Coffin interpolated soils values using kriging to derive values at arthropod sample locations. David Bosch collected and processed meteorological data. Lynne Seymour provided statistical expertise in deriving any estimated values (phloem feeders, parasitoids, spiders, and natural enemies). Alisa Coffin derived terrain data (elevation, slope, aspect, and distances) from publicly available datasets, transformed values (SI, WI, etc), carried out the geographically weighted regression analysis and calculated C:SE values, harmonized the full dataset, and compiled it using Esri's ArcGIS Pro 2.5. Methods for most data are published in the accompanying paper and associated supplements.,Questions about dataset development and management should be directed to Alisa Coffin (alisa.coffin@usda.gov). This work was accomplished as a joint USDA and University of Georgia project funded by a cooperative agreement (#6048-13000-026-21S). This research was a contribution from the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network. LTAR is supported by the United States Department of Agriculture.,At request of the author, the data resources are under embargo. The embargo will expire on Fri, Jan 01, 2021.,

,We compared all combinations of three commercial traps and five different attractants on the capture of stored-product insects for two consecutive years in three food processing facilities in Central Greece. Specifically, Facility 1 and 2 were pasta factories and Facility 3 was a flour mill. The traps that were used in the experiments were Dome Trap (Trécé Inc., USA), Wall Trap (Trécé Inc., USA) and Box Trap (Insects Limited, Ltd., USA). The attractants that were evaluated were 0.13 g of : 1) of PantryPatrol gel (Insects Limited, Inc., USA), 2) Storgard kairomone food attractant oil (Trece Inc.), 3) wheat germ (Honeyville, USA), 4) Dermestid tablet attractant (Insects Limited Inc., USA). The traps were inspected approximately every 15 days and rotated clockwise. The captured insects were transferred to the Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology (LEAZ) at University of Thessaly for identification. The results indicated that there was a wide range of species within the three facilities throughout the trapping period, with the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner), the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and the cigarette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne (F.), being the most abundant. Although there were noticeable differences among the different traps and attractants for the capture of certain species, all combinations provided comparable population fluctuation patterns. In general, Dome traps, baited with either the oil or the gel, were found to be the most effective.,There are not much data available so far for the simultaneous comparable use of different trapping devices and different attractants in commercial facilities for long-term monitoring. Certain lures are marketed toward particular pests or classes of pests, while others might be more generic, multi-species lures. To shed light on this issue, we evaluated a series of combinations of floor traps and attractants, in three commercial facilities in Greece, for a period of two years. Our questions included both which trap was broadly most effective as well as whether different combinations of traps and types of attractants were delivering novel information about the stored product insect community. The traps include two types of floor traps, and the wall trap used in the USDA khapra beetle detection programs. The lures included the Insects Limited ™ dermestid tab that is more specifically focused on food kairomones for only that taxon, and the same company’s PantryPatrol gel, which uses wheat kairomones and the pheromones of multiple species, including dermestids. We also use the Trécé Storgard kairomone oil, and simple wheat germ, which are both multi-species kairomones with no pheromones.,Resources in this dataset:,Resource Title: 2018 and 2019 field trapping data,File Name: kb_greek_data_ag_data_commons.csv,Resource Description:,2.1 Storage facilities: The storage facilities in which this study took place are located in Central Greece. The selection of these facilities was based on their size, the accessibility from University of Thessaly (UTH) personnel and the known historical presence of stored product insect species and other arthropods. The sampling was conducted in three types of storage facilities refereed as Facility 1, Facility 2 and Facility 3. Facilities 1 and 2 are pasta factories, with substantial quantities of soft and hard wheat, flour and bran, but also some barley and maize, while Facility 3 is a flour mill, mostly focused on soft wheat processing. The deployment of the traps on each facility was conducted at 18 June 2018, 4 July 2018, and 3 July 2018 for Facility 1, 2 and 3, respectively.,2.2. Traps, attractants and inspection: The trap types that were used in our experiments were Dome Trap (Trécé Inc., USA), Wall Trap (Trécé Inc., USA) and Box Trap (Insects Limited, Ltd., USA). These traps have been proven effective for monitoring purposes based on previous studies (Toews et al., 2009; Athanassiou and Arthur, 2018;